[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-12-09 Thread Michael Casadevall
Did some major cleanup of this bug. Debdiffs attached for review. In general, the primary change for the backport was to modify the package to build against Python 2 instead of Python 3; one code change was needed in certbot to disable API documentation as the necessary sphinx module is not

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-11-03 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-10-22 Thread Brad Warren
Unless we want this package to suddenly break for approximately 10,000 users in February, I think we probably want to do an SRU to Certbot version 0.21.1 or higher. I wrote more about the problem in the relevant issue at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python- letsencrypt/+bug/1745126.

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-10-16 Thread Kraut.Hosting
FYI pushed some backporting from bionic to xenial without touching existing Python dependencies: https://launchpad.net/~kraut.hosting/+archive/ubuntu/certbot/+packages Would recommend to rebase this SRU effort on the packages we have in bionic now anyway. So far my push does only cover Certbot

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-09-08 Thread Kraut.Hosting
This is still a valid issue for everyone want to do a proper QA chain in software delivery. Both the recent Snap package from Robie as the certbot PPA by our Debian heroes have the problem on different install times you have different versions installed. On a big bunch of boxes this gives us the

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-07-05 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
I agree it would be a shame, but we need someone to sort out the build failures and make sure the packages are in proper shape. Robie, since you were the original backporter, would you be able to drive this forward? The point release is nearing and I'd prefer not to have stale packages in

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-06-29 Thread Brad Warren
As a developer of letsencrypt/certbot, it'll be pretty disappointing to us if we can't some kind of update here. In addition to the many bugs listed in the original description that would be fixed by this SRU, the python-letsencrypt-apache package has been unable to obtain new certificates since

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-06-29 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Please someone look into the build failures in the nearest days. If there will be no movement on these packages I will be removing them from xenial-proposed and marking the bug as Won't Fix (as per SRU policy). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-03-25 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Oh, I see the Xenial update was blocked by build failures. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2018-03-25 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Should this update just be let into Xenial now? Someone needs to start yet another backport of certbot for LP: #1745227. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title: [SRU] Backport

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-10-02 Thread Brad Warren
While I didn't look any more into the build failure for the letsencrypt package (let me know if you'd like me to), I added a check to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot/TestScript testing that a symlink is properly created in the user's PATH. The test passes on the letsencrypt

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-09-19 Thread Brad Warren
Thanks for approving the binary. Tests passed for the proposed Xenial packages using https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot/TestScript. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-09-18 Thread Brad Warren
Unfortunately the test script at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/Certbot/TestScript cannot be used to test the Xenial packages yet because the python-certbot-nginx binary still needs to be accepted. See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue. Is someone able to approve this

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-09-02 Thread Mathew Hodson
** No longer affects: python-letsencrypt (Ubuntu Yakkety) ** No longer affects: python-letsencrypt (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: python-letsencrypt-apache (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: python-letsencrypt-apache (Ubuntu Yakkety) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-09-01 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted python-letsencrypt into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python- letsencrypt/0.4.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-09-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted python-certbot-apache into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /python-certbot-apache/0.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-08-21 Thread Nish Aravamudan
Hi Peter, Robie is on leave the next few days, but here's what I know: 1) As far as I can tell all the packages we expect to see in Zesty are in zesty-proposed now. They bake for at least a week there. Someone needs to go through the testing of the packages from proposed and update the metadata

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-08-21 Thread Peter Eckersley
What are next steps here? Is the Zesty SRU ready to go? Does Robie (or someone else) need to make a python-certbot package for Xenial? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title:

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-08-11 Thread Brad Warren
I just successfully ran the test script I provided earlier on the proposed Ubuntu Zesty packages. I had to make a couple modifications to properly install the packages from the proposed archive. An updated version of the script is attached. ** Attachment added: "ubuntu-test.sh"

[Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.2

2017-08-10 Thread Brian Murray
I don't see an upload of the python-certbot package in the -proposed queue for Xenial, am I missing something? +python-letsencrypt (0.4.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium + + * Drop letsencrypt binary package; this is now produced by the +python-certbot package (LP: #1640978) --