[Bug 1705215] Re: invalid udev rules shipped in mdadm-udeb

2018-12-10 Thread pragyansri.pa...@intel.com
Is this fix pulled in to Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705215 Title: invalid udev rules shipped in mdadm-udeb To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1705215] Re: invalid udev rules shipped in mdadm-udeb

2018-06-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mdadm - 4.0-2ubuntu1.1 --- mdadm (4.0-2ubuntu1.1) bionic; urgency=medium * Install identical udev rules into d-i installer udeb, as used in the installed system. Specifically, post-processed rules with full path to mdadm binary subsituted,

[Bug 1705215] Re: invalid udev rules shipped in mdadm-udeb

2018-05-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Booting with http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu- server/bionic/daily/20180524/ which has /pool/main/m/mdadm/mdadm- udeb_4.0-2ubuntu1_amd64.udeb there are no symlinks present in /dev/md for my raid1 device. Installing using http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu- server/bionic/daily/20180525/ d-i server

[Bug 1705215] Re: invalid udev rules shipped in mdadm-udeb

2018-05-24 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Tomasz, or anyone else affected, Accepted mdadm into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/4.0-2ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1705215] Re: invalid udev rules shipped in mdadm-udeb

2018-05-24 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * Upon installation, RAID devices are not automatically assembled by + default as they used to be. Instead of being presented with an assembled + RAID array for installation, one is presented with individual disks + which probably is not desired by the

[Bug 1705215] Re: invalid udev rules shipped in mdadm-udeb

2018-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mdadm - 4.1~rc1-2 --- mdadm (4.1~rc1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Install identical udev rules into d-i installer udeb, as used in the installed system. Specifically, post-processed rules with full path to mdadm binary subsituted, instead