** Changed in: dpf-plugins
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
Title:
[Needs Packaging] DPF-Plugins for Eoan
To manage notifications about
There's really no point in building for s390x, arm64, or powerpc. These
plugins are simply not created for those architectures.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
Title:
[Needs
Thanks for all the fixes! Looking good packaging-wise I must say, but
sadly the package is FTBFS on all architectures besides amd64 and i386.
I suppose those two architectures make the most sense, right? In this
case, should we restrict the number of build architectures to amd64 and
i386 for now?
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
Title:
[Needs Packaging] DPF-Plugins for Eoan
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
Title:
[Needs Packaging] DPF-Plugins for Eoan
To manage
1) Looks like I missed those before, added now.
2) Fixed.
3) Thomas made a nice watch file. Forgive my ignorance, but I didn't know how
(or even if) to add that. Thomas has since shown me where to find that
information.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Changed
Erich indicated to me they did not know how to structure the
debian/watch file. I assisted them in that regard, using
https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#GitHub as a 'starting source' as
the 'source' they were pulling from is at https://github.com/DISTRHO
/DPF-Plugins/
The source code in the
I can answer the source tarball question. Tagged releases on GH are
where the tar ball version numbers originate from. Source tarballs are
derived from GH's automatic source code tarballing for the repo on new
version tags. Horrid, I know, but... that's what I discerned when
asking that
Hello Erich! Thank you for preparing the new package and thank you
Thomas for sponsoring it. The package looks good, but there are still a
few things I'd like to have addressed before we can accept it.
1) Copyright needs a bit more work, I suppose? So the worst thing about
packages that batch up
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: dpf-plugins
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
NOTE: This was fixed by Eickmeyer in the code as well as the invalid
changelog target. https://git.launchpad.net/dpf-
plugins/commit/?id=db45f68223a5461d2de4ebe1efdde418d76ee4fd fixes the
description concerns.
>From my perspective this package *looks* clean, so I'll sponsor it into
NEW. It will
Fix for control file pushed.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
Title:
[Needs Packaging] DPF-Plugins for Eoan
To
Looks like some lines got blended togehter, the individual formats are
defined in the first lines, and that ended up being missed. I blame
myself for that.
Digging further, I've made revisions to my assessment.
dpf-plugins-common says: " Collection of DPF-based plugins in LADSPA,
DSSI, LV2 and
FOR THE RECORD: I've been taking my time working on this review for
about a week now, so as not to overwork vs. the other work I do outside
Ubuntu.
Static Code Analysis Tools Results (CodeWarrior)
Static code analysis of the C/C++ driven files present shows some TOCTOU
risk and potential command
For the record of other sponsors, I'm in the process of reviewing this
(slowly) both from a general code perspective as well as a packaging
perspective. This is currently assigned to me as such, during my
review.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Ward (teward)
--
You
Links added to description.
** Description changed:
From the project:
Collection of DPF-based audio plugins in LADSPA, DSSI, LV2 and VST2 formats.
.
The list of plugins/packs are:
- glBars
- Kars
- Mini-Series (3BandEQ, 3BandSplitter, PingPongPan)
- ndc-Plugs
Please link where we can find the package and resubscribe sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
Title:
[Needs Packaging] DPF-Plugins for Eoan
To manage notifications
** Description changed:
From the project:
- Collection of DPF-based plugins in LADSPA, DSSI, LV2 and VST2 formats.
- .
- The list of plugins/packs are:
- - glBars
- - Kars
- - Mini-Series (3BandEQ, 3BandSplitter, PingPongPan)
- - ndc-Plugs (Amplitude Imposer, Cycle Shifter, Soul
*** This is an automated message ***
This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for
a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug
reports specification,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-
packaging bug reports
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829562
Title:
[Needs Packaging] DPF-Plugins for Eoan
To manage notifications
21 matches
Mail list logo
