** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
To
Hi, sorry for the delay, accepted into focal-backports.
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
To manage
On Tuesday, April 19 2022, Fantu wrote:
> done a fast rebuild of rdeps in another ppa:
> https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/freeipmi-backports
> all uploaded after freeipmi build was published in the ppa
Thanks, Fabio.
I've just uploaded the package to focal-backports. It's
done a fast rebuild of rdeps in another ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/freeipmi-backports
all uploaded after freeipmi build was published in the ppa
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Tuesday, April 19 2022, Fantu wrote:
> Hi, thanks for reply, 1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1 was a mistake and some days
> ago I fixed removing ~bpo10+1, where you still view
> 1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1?
> When I'll have time I'll try to do rdeps build in a ppa
Hey Fabio,
Thanks. I was
Hi, thanks for reply, 1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1 was a mistake and some days
ago I fixed removing ~bpo10+1, where you still view 1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1?
When I'll have time I'll try to do rdeps build in a ppa
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Ah, there's actually something else: as Andreas mentioned before, one of
the things we have to check is whether the reverse-depends of the
package will build fine with the new version. I looked at your
backports PPA linked above but couldn't find the rdeps there.
Here's the list:
$
Thanks for the bug report, Fabio.
I reviewed the branch where you put the backport patch and it seems
mostly good to me. The only comment I have is about the version string
you chose:
1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1
I understand that this is probably because you based your work on top of
the
Yes, that backport works for me. However, we want it in Focal as well.
How do we get that fixed?
A sponsor is needed? I can say the code works, but how to resolve the
backport issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
the package with ipv6 conf support (1.6.9-2) is already in Jammy, this
is for backport to focal, you already using the updated version from my
PPA but what is good is having a official one (in focal-backports)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Is there a way I can help here?
The code works and we are happy with it. What else is needed to get the
packages into 22.04 Jammy?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
Just a note that this needs a sponsor to review and upload it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
To manage notifications about
A testing ppa was already done, used and linked above.
I prepared for the official build in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/freeipmi/-/commits/focal-backports and tried to
upload in another PPA but:
...
running supported-distribution: check whether the target distribution is
currently supported
Can you create a build in a focal ppa perhaps? Together with reverse
dependencies if needed? I see the sonames of the built libraries didn't
change, so no other rebuilds are probably needed. I also did a quick
check on the diff of the debian/*.symbols files, and no symbols were
changed, but please
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
** Also affects: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
17 matches
Mail list logo