[Bug 1973828] Re: [MIR] gnome-console

2022-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bicha
I added a manual test case link to the bug description.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GNOMEConsole

I opened LP: #1977769 to request that we customize the translucent
content background color.

** Description changed:

  [Availability]
  Already in Ubuntu universe.
  Builds and works for all supported architectures except i386 (i386 is not 
needed)
  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-console
  
  [Rationale]
  - The package gnome-console is required in Ubuntu main to replace 
gnome-terminal as the default terminal emulator
  - Package gnome-console covers the same use case as gnome-terminal but is 
more closely aligned with GNOME development.
  
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/proposal-gnome-console-as-default-terminal-app/28309
  
  - The package gnome-console is required in Ubuntu main no later than
  August 25 for Ubuntu 22.10 Feature Freeze
  
  [Security]
  - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past
  
  - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries
  - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin`
  - Package does not install systemd services, timers or recurring jobs
  - There is a standard GApplication service so that only one instance runs at 
a time, etc.
  - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024)
  - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software
  
  [Quality assurance - function/usage]
  - The package works well right after install
  
  [Quality assurance - maintenance]
  - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu and has not too many
-   and long term critical bugs open
-   - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-console/+bug
-   - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=gnome-console
-   - GNOME https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/console/-/issues
+   and long term critical bugs open
+   - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-console/+bug
+   - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=gnome-console
+   - GNOME https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/console/-/issues
  
  - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support
  
  [Quality assurance - testing]
  - There is an extremely minimal test suite. If it fails, the build fails.
-   it makes the build fail, link to build log 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/599103987/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-amd64.gnome-console_42~beta-2_BUILDING.txt.gz
+   it makes the build fail, link to build log 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/599103987/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-amd64.gnome-console_42~beta-2_BUILDING.txt.gz
  
  - The package has a superficial autopkgtest. The package it is
  replacing, gnome-terminal, does not have any autopkgtests.
+ 
+ - There is a manual test case to test all the current user-facing features
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GNOMEConsole
  
  [Quality assurance - packaging]
  - debian/watch is present and works
  
  - No Lintian warnings. lintian pedantic and info:
  I: gnome-console source: superficial-tests
  P: gnome-console source: maintainer-manual-page debian/kgx.1
  P: gnome-console source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file src/logo.txt 
line 8 is 875 characters long (>512)
  
  - Lintian overrides are not present
  
  - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
  - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies
  
  - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf
  questions
  
  - Packaging and build is easy, link to d/rules
  https://salsa.debian.org/DebianOnMobile-team/gnome-
  console/-/blob/debian/master/debian/rules
  
  [UI standards]
  - Application is end-user facing, Translation is present, via standard gettext
  - End-user applications that ships a standard conformant desktop file,
  
  [Dependencies]
  - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main
  
  [Standards compliance]
  - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy
  
  [Maintenance/Owner]
  - Owning Team will be desktop-packages
  - Team is not yet, but will subscribe to the package before promotion
  
  - This does not use static builds
  - This does not use vendored code
  
  - The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last
-   test rebuild
+   test rebuild
  
  [Background information]
  The Package description explains the package well
  Upstream Name is gnome-console
  Link to upstream project https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-console
  The project was previously known as Kings Cross or kgx. The binary name is 
still /usr/bin/kgx

** Changed in: gnome-console (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973828

Title:
  [MIR] gnome-console

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-console/+bug/1973828/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 1973828] Re: [MIR] gnome-console

2022-06-01 Thread Didier Roche
[Summary]
MIR team ACK under the constraint to resolve the below listed required TODOs 
and as much as possible having a look at the recommended TODOs.

Required TODOs:
- The whole testing story is really weak in term of autopkgtests and build 
tests. I would require a manual test plan to cover for that on each release as 
if there were none.

Recommended TODOs:
- (Nitpick): I think it’s the right time, as it’s going to replace 
gnome-terminal, to explore patching the background color to look more like 
Ubuntu. I don’t think it’s something we want to reach later on, close to Final 
Freeze.

[Duplication]
There is no gnome-terminal in main providing the same functionality, but this 
application is going to replace it.

[Dependencies]
OK:
- no other Dependencies to MIR due to this
- no -dev/-debug/-doc packages that need exclusion
- No dependencies in main that are only superficially tested requiring
  more tests now.

[Embedded sources and static linking]
OK:
- no embedded source present
- no static linking
- does not have odd Built-Using entries

OK:
- not a go package, no extra constraints to consider in that regard

[Security]
OK:
- history of CVEs does not look concerning
- does not run a daemon as root
- does not use webkit1,2
- does not use lib*v8 directly
- does not parse data formats
- does not open a port/socket
- does not process arbitrary web content
- does not use centralized online accounts
- does not integrate arbitrary javascript into the desktop
- does not deal with system authentication (eg, pam), etc)
- does not deal with security attestation (secure boot, tpm, signatures)

[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- no new python2 dependency

Problems:
-> The whole testing story is really weak in term of autopkgtests and build 
tests. I would require a manual test plan to cover for that on each release as 
if there were none.

[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does not carry a delta
- symbols tracking not applicable for this kind of code.
- d/watch is present and looks ok
- Upstream update history is good- warning, this is still a really new project.
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is good
- the current release is packaged
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
- no massive Lintian warnings
- d/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list

[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Errors/warnings during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (as far as we can check it)
- no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (usage is OK inside
  tests)
- no use of user nobody
- no use of setuid
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-*
- part of the UI, desktop file is ok
- translation present


** Changed in: gnome-console (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

** Changed in: gnome-console (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Jeremy Bicha (jbicha)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973828

Title:
  [MIR] gnome-console

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-console/+bug/1973828/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1973828] Re: [MIR] gnome-console

2022-05-24 Thread Didier Roche
** Changed in: gnome-console (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973828

Title:
  [MIR] gnome-console

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-console/+bug/1973828/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs