Many thanks Chris.
I just felt triggered by this closing because I remember how much pain
this bug caused me while working in a data center back in the days. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Christian,
I saw both, the close and your question.
I'd assume that Steve is updating those in a semi-automated fashion, there is
no way he could read all those bugs.
Per bug status this one is marked fixed and only had a bug task open to
backport to Precise.
In fact the upstream commit that
Ok that is EOL but did you verify it is not the case in the newer
versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be
fixed for that release
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing
Unsubscribing sponsors, please re-subscribe when you attach a working
patch. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing
Unsubscribing sponsors, please re-subscribe when you attach a working
patch. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using
Note that the patch is a no-op. The source package format is 1.0 and it
doesn't call quilt explicitly. The precise package uses inline patches.
I tried to apply it manually, but it doesn't fit at all..
Can you please backport the patch to the precise version and change it
inline?
** Changed in:
Note that the patch is a no-op. The source package format is 1.0 and it
doesn't call quilt explicitly. The precise package uses inline patches.
I tried to apply it manually, but it doesn't fit at all..
Can you please backport the patch to the precise version and change it
inline?
** Changed in:
Jorge, Chuck, can you get that update/uploaded?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To manage notifications
Jorge, Chuck, can you get that update/uploaded?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To manage
@arges,
I re-uploaded the patch, rebasing with current -updates and fixing the
issue you detected. Please sponsor.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU]
Attached patch for precise.
** Patch added: patch for precise
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/4399572/+files/lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
** Patch removed: lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
@arges,
I re-uploaded the patch, rebasing with current -updates and fixing the
issue you detected. Please sponsor.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Attached patch for precise.
** Patch added: patch for precise
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/4399572/+files/lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
** Patch removed: lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
Jorge, can you reformat the debdiff so it just adds the debian patch and
doesn't also modify the original source? Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq
Jorge, can you reformat the debdiff so it just adds the debian patch and
doesn't also modify the original source? Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
The attached patch, applies upstream
9380ba70d67db6b69f817d8e318de5ba1e990b12 into precise.
** Patch added: lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/4363091/+files/lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
--
The attached patch, applies upstream
9380ba70d67db6b69f817d8e318de5ba1e990b12 into precise.
** Patch added: lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/4363091/+files/lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch
--
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Medium = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Medium = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To
Did this make it into 12.04.2 LTS? We still experience breakage here,
and must manually apply a newer dnsmasq out of band (which causes all
sorts of other administration burdens). I don't see it in cloud-archive
either according to the most recent comment 1 month ago.
--
You received this bug
Did this make it into 12.04.2 LTS? We still experience breakage here,
and must manually apply a newer dnsmasq out of band (which causes all
sorts of other administration burdens). I don't see it in cloud-archive
either according to the most recent comment 1 month ago.
--
You received this bug
Chuck, this is still assigned to you. Is it going anywhere?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
No we are probably going to be backporting it to the cloud archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using
Chuck, this is still assigned to you. Is it going anywhere?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To manage
No we are probably going to be backporting it to the cloud archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To
This is hitting a lot of openstack users who chose 12.04 due to the
announcement of backporting openstack to precise for 3 years:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive
We fall into that category. It's pretty much impossible to use stock
versions of dnsmasq and openstack in 12.04. This
This is hitting a lot of openstack users who chose 12.04 due to the
announcement of backporting openstack to precise for 3 years:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive
We fall into that category. It's pretty much impossible to use stock
versions of dnsmasq and openstack in 12.04. This
Was this update to dnsmasq released in 12.04.1 ?
root@ubuntu:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04
Codename: precise
root@ubuntu:~# apt-cache policy dnsmasq
dnsmasq:
Installed: 2.59-4
Candidate:
No
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Was this update to dnsmasq released in 12.04.1 ?
root@ubuntu:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04
Codename: precise
root@ubuntu:~# apt-cache policy dnsmasq
dnsmasq:
Installed: 2.59-4
Candidate:
No
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04.1 = precise-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04.1 = precise-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using
Assigned this bug to myself when going through the buglist as it was in
my usual package list, though based on past comments, I'm now re-
assigning to Chuck as he's more familiar with the issue.
I'll be interested in looking at the diff before it gets pushed to our
users though. As Steve said, we
Assigned this bug to myself when going through the buglist as it was in
my usual package list, though based on past comments, I'm now re-
assigning to Chuck as he's more familiar with the issue.
I'll be interested in looking at the diff before it gets pushed to our
users though. As Steve said, we
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Stéphane Graber (stgraber)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Stéphane Graber (stgraber)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues
Ill fix this up do as requested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To manage notifications
Ill fix this up do as requested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
To manage notifications about this bug go
Well, what I meant was: the code that you're touching is in the dnsmasq-
base package, and dnsmasq-base is installed on *all* Ubuntu systems, as
a dependency of network-manager. It seems that the worst-case regression
potential is that we break DNS on all Ubuntu systems, which would be bad
:)
lxc
And that means what?
Will you (Ubuntu) ignore the bug and leave the patching up to the
libvirt/lxc Ubuntu users?
I am confused. :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
Chuck, please put SRU information in the bug description, not in a
comment - it becomes hard to find this information when there are a
dozen more comments from testers.
** Description changed:
+ ** Issue **
+
There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
up a
Please also complete the test case with explicit information about how
users can verify the *fix* for this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU]
I'm afraid I also don't understand this problem statement:
There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
up a single copy of dnsmasq for each vlan on the network host (or on
every host in multi_host mode). The problem is in the way that dnsmasq
binds to an ip
... and now I've reviewed the debdiff, and found it to not match the
upstream commit. This part of the patch to src/network.c is missing:
@@ -254,6 +261,7 @@ static int iface_allowed(struct irec **irecp, int if_index,
iface-addr = *addr;
iface-netmask = netmask;
Before the SRU team will reconsider an SRU for this, based on the above
I would also expect to see a regression test plan that accounts for
making sure dnsmasq continues to work correctly in configurations other
than the openstack one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Well, what I meant was: the code that you're touching is in the dnsmasq-
base package, and dnsmasq-base is installed on *all* Ubuntu systems, as
a dependency of network-manager. It seems that the worst-case regression
potential is that we break DNS on all Ubuntu systems, which would be bad
:)
lxc
And that means what?
Will you (Ubuntu) ignore the bug and leave the patching up to the
libvirt/lxc Ubuntu users?
I am confused. :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
Chuck, please put SRU information in the bug description, not in a
comment - it becomes hard to find this information when there are a
dozen more comments from testers.
** Description changed:
+ ** Issue **
+
There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
up a
Please also complete the test case with explicit information about how
users can verify the *fix* for this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at
I'm afraid I also don't understand this problem statement:
There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
up a single copy of dnsmasq for each vlan on the network host (or on
every host in multi_host mode). The problem is in the way that dnsmasq
binds to an ip
... and now I've reviewed the debdiff, and found it to not match the
upstream commit. This part of the patch to src/network.c is missing:
@@ -254,6 +261,7 @@ static int iface_allowed(struct irec **irecp, int if_index,
iface-addr = *addr;
iface-netmask = netmask;
Before the SRU team will reconsider an SRU for this, based on the above
I would also expect to see a regression test plan that accounts for
making sure dnsmasq continues to work correctly in configurations other
than the openstack one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Roaf,
What I mean for most. I mean we dont recommend that people use VLAN
but some people do use it, and are not able to use vlan with the dnsmasq
in precise without this fix.
Regards
chuck
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Roaf,
What I mean for most. I mean we dont recommend that people use VLAN
but some people do use it, and are not able to use vlan with the dnsmasq
in precise without this fix.
Regards
chuck
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hey,
sorry, with most I meant the documentation recommends using
VlanManager (that is, VLAN mode) for networking.
Although, you cannot rely on such a behaviour, IMHO, because it
absolutely makes no sense to let hosts (that send a DHCPREQUEST) not
receive their DHCPACK.
--
You received this bug
Could this be more safely worked-around in openstack?
forgot to comment on this one, well, I am no OpenStack expert, however,
OpenStack nova-network relies on dnsmasq for propagating IP addresses
via DHCP to their (KVM/...) instances, and OpenStack supports simple
networking (w/o VLAN) and
Hey,
sorry, with most I meant the documentation recommends using
VlanManager (that is, VLAN mode) for networking.
Although, you cannot rely on such a behaviour, IMHO, because it
absolutely makes no sense to let hosts (that send a DHCPREQUEST) not
receive their DHCPACK.
--
You received this bug
Could this be more safely worked-around in openstack?
forgot to comment on this one, well, I am no OpenStack expert, however,
OpenStack nova-network relies on dnsmasq for propagating IP addresses
via DHCP to their (KVM/...) instances, and OpenStack supports simple
networking (w/o VLAN) and
This seems like an important bug to fix, but I have reservations about
changing dnsmasq's behaviour in a stable update. When you say ‘most
installations don't use this type of networking’, what do you mean by
‘most’, is it plausible that someone has relied on this behaviour, and
if someone had
This seems like an important bug to fix, but I have reservations about
changing dnsmasq's behaviour in a stable update. When you say ‘most
installations don't use this type of networking’, what do you mean by
‘most’, is it plausible that someone has relied on this behaviour, and
if someone had
2.62 is in Quantal
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at
1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using
vlan mode
2.62 is in Quantal
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu
ubuntu-12.04.1.
Matching subscriptions
** Issue **
There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
up a single copy of dnsmasq for each vlan on the network host (or on
every host in multi_host mode). The problem is in the way that dnsmasq
binds to an ip address and port[2]. Both copies can respond to broadcast
** Attachment added: buildlog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/3191161/+files/buildlog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/3191167/+files/debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
2.62 is in Quantal
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when
1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using
vlan mode
2.62 is in Quantal
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu
ubuntu-12.04.1.
Matching subscriptions
** Issue **
There is an issue with the way nova uses dnsmasq in VLAN mode. It starts
up a single copy of dnsmasq for each vlan on the network host (or on
every host in multi_host mode). The problem is in the way that dnsmasq
binds to an ip address and port[2]. Both copies can respond to broadcast
** Attachment added: buildlog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/3191161/+files/buildlog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
** Attachment added: debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/3191167/+files/debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU]
this looks like something we should pull in.
Since Ubuntu has unmodified debian package, and debian maintainer is upstream
maintainer, we should probably let the quantal package get synced from debian.
Then, we can patch the 12.04 Ubuntu version in an SRU.
@Simon,
If you're reading this, do
On 31/05/12 14:57, Scott Moser wrote:
this looks like something we should pull in.
Since Ubuntu has unmodified debian package, and debian maintainer is upstream
maintainer, we should probably let the quantal package get synced from
debian. Then, we can patch the 12.04 Ubuntu version in an
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-12.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues
this looks like something we should pull in.
Since Ubuntu has unmodified debian package, and debian maintainer is upstream
maintainer, we should probably let the quantal package get synced from debian.
Then, we can patch the 12.04 Ubuntu version in an SRU.
@Simon,
If you're reading this, do
On 31/05/12 14:57, Scott Moser wrote:
this looks like something we should pull in.
Since Ubuntu has unmodified debian package, and debian maintainer is upstream
maintainer, we should probably let the quantal package get synced from
debian. Then, we can patch the 12.04 Ubuntu version in an
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-12.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898
Title:
[SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode
80 matches
Mail list logo
