[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2013-09-10 Thread Hairong Zhu
lorenzo's solution works for me, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028681 Title: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-11-05 Thread Jarvis Schultz
Removing ghostscript 8.70, and using 9.05~dfsg-0ubuntu4.2 from the 12.04 repositories, and then following the suggestion of @lorenzo worked for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028681

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-11-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: auctex (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028681 Title: gho

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-11-05 Thread lorenzo
I am not sure whether this is the right place to post at this point, but I also experienced the same problem and I found a quick fix. I am working on a fresh ubuntu 12.04 LTS installation, emacs 23.3.1, auctex 11.86 and ghostscript 9.05 (everything from ubuntu software center). I fixed the probl

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-09-12 Thread era
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608802 looks related, but I am hesitant to mark that as the proper upstream bug for this one. If the workarounds hinted at in the resolution work for you, please feel free to add this information by clicking on "Also affects Distribution", selecting

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-09-12 Thread era
As far as I am able to understand, this no longer needs to be "Incomplete" as it was reassigned to the correct package now. Thus, changing bug status to New. ** Changed in: auctex (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #608802 http://bugs.debian.org/c

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-08-31 Thread Jarvis Schultz
I am sure I am not the only one with this bug... I really don't want it to close. Can I provide any more helpful info? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028681 Title: ghostscript 9.05

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-07-26 Thread Jarvis Schultz
I believe that you are correct in thinking it is a problem in auctex. I was able to run all of the latex, dvips, and ghostscript calls that preview-latex is making individually with both versions of gs. Therefore the conclusion is indeed that there is a problem with the way that preview-latex is c

[Bug 1028681] Re: ghostscript 9.05 fails with preview-latex and auctex

2012-07-25 Thread Till Kamppeter
"Error: /invalidfileaccess in --file--" means that Ghostscript is not able to read one of the input files or to write its output file. The file in question is probably _region_.prv/tmp30703Qa0/preview.ps as this file name is on the top of the Ghostscript stack. Moving to auctex ... If you tghink i