Well, at least Suma Byrappa is the person that has this bug assigned,
and Amarnath Chitumalla is listes as "may be notified" on this page. The
two should probably know the answer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 02/07/2019, Rüdiger Kupper wrote:
> Is the hpcups driver actually being maintained by HP? Or is this a
> community driver?
I don't know (and I don't even know how to find out!) I also don't
know whether the following info has any relevance to your question
or not, but:
Is the hpcups driver actually being maintained by HP? Or is this a
community driver?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036236
Title:
hpcups and hpijs driver use different rasterization
On 02/07/2019, Matt Whitlock <1036...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> While debugging an unrelated issue with printing to my HP LaserJet 1012,
> I switched from the "hpcups" driver to the "hpijs" driver, and I am
> **BLOWN AWAY** by the quality of its dithering. After seeing the
> difference, I am
While debugging an unrelated issue with printing to my HP LaserJet 1012,
I switched from the "hpcups" driver to the "hpijs" driver, and I am
**BLOWN AWAY** by the quality of its dithering. After seeing the
difference, I am absolutely appalled at how poorly the "hpcups" driver
dithers grayscales. I
# Hello J T,
Hi Rüdiger,
# I just resigned and kept using the HPIJS driver, which produces much better
# (in terms of visually accurate) output.
Exactly the same situation here.
# However, Till Kamppeter says that Ubuntu is actively phasing out the HPIJS
# driver. This means that the HPCUPS
For the record: Upstream bug is at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1036236. But projects are linked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036236
Title:
hpcups and hpijs driver use
Hello J T,
thanks for reporting that this is still a problem. I had originally filed this
report in 2012, but since it never moved forward I just resigned and kept using
the HPIJS driver, which produces much better (in terms of visually accurate)
output. However, Till Kamppeter says that Ubuntu
J T, you are posting your auto-generated bug data here but do not post a
comment telling what is exactly your observation.
Note that in HPLIP upstream HPIJS is still contained but not further
developed. We also do not explicitly support it any more in Ubuntu, we
encourage users to switch to
Hello gf.
I am not Rüdiger, the original submitter of this bug, but I am affected
by it. Since Rüdiger has not posted to this bug report in over 7 years,
I am posting to it to let you know that:
1) It *is* still a problem,
2) I *am* still interested in finding a solution to this bug,
and
3) I
ProblemType: Bug
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CupsErrorLog:
W [20/Jun/2019:09:16:39 +0100] CreateProfile failed:
org.freedesktop.ColorManager.AlreadyExists:profile id
\'serverLaser.hpijs-Gray..\' already exists
W [20/Jun/2019:09:16:39 +0100] CreateProfile failed:
Hello Rudiger,
Thank you for submitting this bug and reporting a problem with the hplip
package. You made this bug report in 2012 and Ubuntu and hplip have been
updated since then.
Could you confirm that this is no longer a problem and that we can close the
ticket?
If it is still a problem,
** Changed in: hplip
Assignee: (unassigned) = Suma Byrappa (suma-byrappa)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036236
Title:
hpcups and hpijs driver use different rasterization
To
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: hplip (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036236
Title:
** Changed in: hplip
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036236
Title:
hpcups and hpijs driver use different rasterization
To manage notifications about
I'd like to add that printing an image (colored, but mostly black) is fine when
using the normal mode, but the contrast on the paper is very poor when
printing in the normal grayscale mode. Black lines are printed as very light
gray lines.
I have encountered this on different HP (color)
** Description changed:
HPLIP provides two drivers for the Laserjet 1515n: hpcups and hpijs:
- hp-color_laserjet_cp1515n-hpijs-pcl3.ppd
- hp-color_laserjet_cp1515n-pcl3.ppd
The new hpcups shall replace the old hpijs, however, it produces very
different rasterization results,
** Description changed:
HPLIP provides two drivers for the Laserjet 1515n: hpcups and hpijs:
- - hp-color_laserjt_cp1515n-hpijs-pcl3.ppd
- - hp-color_laserjt_cp1515n-pcl3.ppd
+ - hp-color_laserjet_cp1515n-hpijs-pcl3.ppd
+ - hp-color_laserjet_cp1515n-pcl3.ppd
The new hpcups shall replace
This is a problem of the upstream design of the HPLIP printer drivers by
HP, not of the Ubuntu packaging of the drivers. Therefore I am adding an
upstream task to make your bug report visible to the developers at HP.
Can someone of the HPLIP developers at HP look into this and tell why
the two
19 matches
Mail list logo
