[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2 --- ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2) saucy-proposed; urgency=medium * d/radosgw.postinst,postrm,preinst: Handle renaming of radosgw upstart configuration@0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1. ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1) saucy-proposed; urgency=low

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2 --- ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2) saucy-proposed; urgency=medium * d/radosgw.postinst,postrm,preinst: Handle renaming of radosgw upstart configuration@0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1. ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1) saucy-proposed; urgency=low

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-24 Thread James Page
Upgraded a base saucy radosgw; init script was left intact and the radosgw upstart config was renamed correctly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-24 Thread James Page
Upgraded a base saucy radosgw; init script was left intact and the radosgw upstart config was renamed correctly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-23 Thread Brian Murray
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-23 Thread Brian Murray
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-17 Thread James Page
I've uploaded an additional fix for this package to -proposed to rename the upstart configuration correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1255464 Title: [SRU]

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-17 Thread James Page
I've uploaded an additional fix for this package to -proposed to rename the upstart configuration correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1255464 Title: [SRU] radosgw init script

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-14 Thread James Page
Verification failed; the upgrade does not remove the radosgw.conf configuration so service still tries to use the obsolete upstart configuration. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2014-01-14 Thread James Page
Verification failed; the upgrade does not remove the radosgw.conf configuration so service still tries to use the obsolete upstart configuration. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2013-12-05 Thread Brian Murray
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2013-12-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/saucy-proposed/ceph -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1255464 Title: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards. To manage

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2013-12-05 Thread Brian Murray
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2013-12-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/saucy-proposed/ceph -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1255464 Title: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards. To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2013-11-29 Thread James Page
** Summary changed: - radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards. + [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1255464

[Bug 1255464] Re: [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

2013-11-29 Thread James Page
** Summary changed: - radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards. + [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1255464 Title: [SRU]