[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-15 Thread Balint Reczey
@Thomas: Thank you for the patch. I have just uploaded wireshark 1.10.5-2 incorporating it to unstable. While GTK+3.10 in not in unstable, it is in experimental and fixing FTBFS with it in other packages is definitely something to be fixed in unstable even before upstreams take action. In simila

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package wireshark - 1.10.5-1ubuntu1 --- wireshark (1.10.5-1ubuntu1) trusty; urgency=low * Include new patches to fix FTBFS issues: (LP: #1269197) + debian/patches/allow-deprecated-gtk-functions.patch: - Incorporate upstream changes to fix the FTBF

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-15 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
> I am aware Upstream has this fixed, but unless 1.10.6 is in Debian before February 20, it'll not make it in here. It will make it here, we usually monitor and sync bug fixes from Debian during most of the development cycle. Fixing Ubuntu-specific FTBFS bugs directly is also fine, of course (Deb

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: wireshark (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269197 Title: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multipl

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Many thanks Thomas, this looks fine! I'll do a test-build and sponsor with a fixed version number (ubuntu1, not ubuntu0.1). ** Changed in: wireshark (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-14 Thread Evan Huus
Sorry, missed the ubuntu-sponsors subscription. Debian is currently building with GTK 3.8, so it works for them (for now). I don't know when they plan to migrate to 3.10, but it's been out since September so I expect they'll move soonish. I believe Balint (debian maintainer) monitors ubuntu bugs

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-14 Thread Thomas Ward
I made a mistake in the initial debdiff. I've attached one that includes this bug number so it gets autoclosed if/when the debdiff is included. ** Patch removed: "Debdiff to fix the FTBFS" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/1269197/+attachment/3948853/+files/wireshark_1.

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-14 Thread Thomas Ward
Evan: I am aware Upstream has this fixed, but unless 1.10.6 is in Debian before February 20, it'll not make it in here, so in the off chance that 1.10.6 isn't an option, this patch should fix the FTBFS in trusty- proposed. (I'm also aware that upstream has this fix because that's where I looked f

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-14 Thread Evan Huus
Hi, thanks for the detailed report. Just so you're aware, I have added the appropriate upstream fixes to Wireshark's stable backport list, so Wireshark 1.10.6 (whenever it is released) should compile correctly without any patches. Unfortunately Wireshark doesn't have an Ubuntu-specific maintainer

[Bug 1269197] Re: Wireshark 1.10.5-1 FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple reasons

2014-01-14 Thread Thomas Ward
I am setting a "High" importance on it according to the wiki documentation of Bug Importance (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance). This is because the FTBFS prevents the software version from building and working. ** Summary changed: - Wireshark FTBFS in trusty-proposed, due to multiple rea