[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-03-14 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
** Changed in: qtfeedback-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: qt3d-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: qtpim-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-03-14 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
** Changed in: qtimageformats-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: qtserialport-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: qtlocation-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in:

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-26 Thread Timo Jyrinki
This week is seeing great progress, and the ETA would be now set to March 6th, if the FFe is accepted. The following remaining issues have been fixed or about to be fixed: - qtvideo-node has been fixed, a manual upload to PPA done while merge is pending - qtmultimedia-opensource-src-touch has a

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
From a release standpoint, the hurdles put in place of this upload via the CI process exceed anything the release team would normally require for such an FFe. And considering the Ubuntu phone image is currently the predominant consumer of Qt5, there's no reason to be concerned that the CI testing

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-23 Thread Timo Jyrinki
Dmitry: The relevant blockers are autopilot test failures and multimedia on Ubuntu Touch. Some manual autopilot testing with phablet-test-run and Nexus 4 can be seen at http://is.gd/JA1jg1. The latest news on multimedia was that they know what needs to be done, but I don't have the latest update

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-21 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Timo, which of the blockers are still relevant? When do you expect it to be ready? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278329 Title: [FFe] Qt 5.2 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-12 Thread Timo Jyrinki
I know this it not a workable solution for U. This is the first ever major upgrade of Qt 5, because the Qt 5.1.1 already didn't happen despite plans. 5.2 on the other hand is too important to not have. The Qt 5.3 timeframe is such that we shouldn't delay moving to that in U, but just bite the

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
What's blocking this from landing now? This has waited far too long in my opinion. I'm afraid we have so many rules about the development release working perfectly now that it's almost impossible to use for development. This is in Debian Testing already. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-11 Thread Timo Jyrinki
You're correct that development release is now kept releasable each day, and each daily Ubuntu Touch image should be flawless (http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/). The new CI Train integration does not allow code merges to trunks unless they don't regress those results. The effects of the

Re: [Bug 1278329] Re: [FFe] Qt 5.2

2014-02-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
Starting next cycle, Kubuntu will be a major user of Qt5. Landing the major Qt5 revision just days before, or maybe even after, feature freeze, is totally unworkable. I think we're likely not to introduce KDE Frameworks 5 packages in this development cycle, but to do post-release backports