[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2015-12-23 Thread Landscape Builder
This bug has not seen any activity in the last 6 months, so it is being automatically closed. If you are still experiencing this issue, please feel free to re-open. Landscape Team ** Changed in: landscape Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2014-11-26 Thread keith andren
** Project changed: launchpad = ubuntu-beginners-launchpad-projects ** Changed in: ubuntu-beginners-launchpad-projects Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2014-11-26 Thread William Grant
** Project changed: ubuntu-beginners-launchpad-projects = launchpad ** Changed in: launchpad Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 Title: Storm should

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2013-06-28 Thread Free Ekanayaka
** Changed in: storm Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 Title: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible To manage

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-06-12 Thread Free Ekanayaka
** Changed in: storm Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 Title: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible To manage

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-03-09 Thread Stuart Bishop
** Changed in: launchpad Status: Triaged = Invalid ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 Title: Storm

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-03-09 Thread Stuart Bishop
psycopg #172 not updating ** Changed in: psycopg Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: psycopg Remote watch: Psycopg Bugs #172 = None ** Changed in: psycopg Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-03-01 Thread Free Ekanayaka
** Changed in: storm Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: storm Assignee: (unassigned) = Free Ekanayaka (free.ekanayaka) ** Changed in: storm Milestone: None = 0.20 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-02-28 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Stuart, thanks for the comments! Okay, let's go for modified commit() and rollback(). I will make tpc off by default in ZStorm and have a way to configure it per-store, because you might don't want to have it on for all stores, for example if they set the isolation level to autocommit (tpc is

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-02-28 Thread Free Ekanayaka
I went ahead and implemented a first version of the branch, with 2 new store methods: begin(xid) and prepare(). So we can discuss actual code (possibly on the mailing list). If there are no objections I'll open a merge proposal for it, so people can comment and I can make any needed changes. **

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-02-27 Thread Stuart Bishop
I'd be happy with just adding prepare() as you describe and modifying commit() and rollback(). The default should certainly be off, as having it on by default is slow and dangerous if you don't have procedures in place to clean up prepared but uncommitted transactions. Extending this beyond that

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2012-02-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi there! I'd like to revive this bug. Since version 2.3, the pyscopg2 driver implements the two-phase commit extension of the DB API specification version 2.0. So I'm keen to pick it up and implement Storm's support for two-phase commit on top of the DB API 2.0 interface. The idea would be to

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2009-12-04 Thread Chuck Short
** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2009-03-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: landscape Target: None = later -- Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2009-03-02 Thread Francis J. Lacoste
The risk for Launchpad is minimal and the recovery pretty trivial. ** Changed in: launchpad-foundations Importance: High = Low Target: 2.2.2 = None -- Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 You received this bug notification

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2009-02-02 Thread Francis J. Lacoste
** Changed in: launchpad-foundations Target: 2.2.1 = 2.2.2 -- Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2009-01-11 Thread Francis J. Lacoste
** Changed in: launchpad-foundations Target: 2.1.12 = 2.2.1 -- Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 132485] Re: Storm should try to support two-phase commit where possible

2008-11-07 Thread Stuart Bishop
** Changed in: storm Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: launchpad Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: launchpad-foundations Product: Launchpad itself = Launchpad Foundations Importance: Undecided = High