Re: [Bug 1357713] Re: ifupdown and upstart can be removed

2014-09-23 Thread Martin Pitt
Clint Byrum [2014-09-23 7:15 -]: > Doesn't ifupdown still bring up lo? Systemd (or perhaps something else too), does that as well. You can install systemd-sysv, purge ifupdown and upstart, and lo will be up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

Re: [Bug 1357713] Re: ifupdown and upstart can be removed

2014-09-23 Thread Clint Byrum
Doesn't ifupdown still bring up lo? Excerpts from Martin Pitt's message of 2014-09-23 06:17:10 UTC: > ubuntu-minimal depends on upstart and ifupdown, so supposedly you > removed that. This is really not a supported configuration. > > As for upstart: Debian has a new essential package "init" which

[Bug 1357713] Re: ifupdown and upstart can be removed

2014-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
ubuntu-minimal depends on upstart and ifupdown, so supposedly you removed that. This is really not a supported configuration. As for upstart: Debian has a new essential package "init" which depends on systemd-sysv | upstart | sysvinit. We could decide to adopt that. Moving to init-system-helpers f

[Bug 1357713] Re: ifupdown and upstart can be removed

2014-09-22 Thread Harry
First of all, I do not think that being unbound is a bug in these unbound packages (upstart and ifupdown). The possible bug is in the package, which should depend on them. However, one should not remove upstart from the setup, unless certain installations and settings is made. First of all, for