Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-snapshot (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've verified that the upstream binary distribution
(http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.0/clang+llvm-3.5.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-
ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz) is *not* affected by this bug.
@RJVB: all I know is that rL201729 was considered for inclusion in
clang-3.4.1, which I believe predates 3.5.0. But I'm not
On Thursday January 15 2015 16:45:56 DaanS wrote:
I've verified that the upstream binary distribution
(http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.0/clang+llvm-3.5.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-
ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz) is *not* affected by this bug.
That would make sense, presuming it's based on 3.5.0 final, and not on a
On 15/01/2015 17:23, RJVB wrote:
On Thursday January 15 2015 16:10:18 DaanS wrote:
Minor update:
Somewhere between rL201729 and RELEASE_350/final, the fix was changed to:
#if __STDC_VERSION__ = 201112L || __cplusplus = 201103L
Minor update:
Somewhere between rL201729 and RELEASE_350/final, the fix was changed to:
#if __STDC_VERSION__ = 201112L || __cplusplus = 201103L
On Thursday January 15 2015 16:10:18 DaanS wrote:
Minor update:
Somewhere between rL201729 and RELEASE_350/final, the fix was changed to:
#if __STDC_VERSION__ = 201112L || __cplusplus = 201103L
I'm not sure how a change of path in gcc could cause this issue. clang++
*should* provide ::max_align_t itself in c++11 mode.
http://reviews.llvm.org/file/data/sw37fgtbupwhetydgazl/PHID-FILE-wprxzvc5yn4ylp7xwt6t/201729.diff:
+#if __STDC_VERSION__ = 201112L || __cplusplus = 201103L
+typedef struct
Is this a regression introduced in Ubuntu?
The SVN sources for clang 3.5.0 and 3.5.1 both contain the fix
introduced in rL201729.
This bug seriously limits the usefulness of clang 3.5 on Ubuntu, as it also
suffers from a serious bug in libstdc++-4.8 (see, for example,
I think it is a caused by a change of path in gcc.
I had several issues like that in the past.
Patches are welcome!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1401202
Title:
clang-3.5 fails to
Not a regression in Ubuntu, unless if you consider standstill =
regression.
As noted by Daan above, all is needed is to update llvm to a more recent
version, like Debian have done in Jessie/Sid.
Backported to 14.04: ppa:rjvbertin/llvm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
10 matches
Mail list logo
