Daniel,
Whats worth waiting for? 0.4.8 in sid is quite stable and contains most
of the patches applied to 0.4.9. The differences between 0.4.3 and
0.4.8 are immense and quite valuable! Near as I can tell pretty
backwards compatible too.
Please push 0.4.8 into Hardy if possible.
--
[UFVe]
wharier, Thanks for the reminder.
I've filed bug 191934 with the sync request.
** Changed in: duplicity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Status: New = Fix Released
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this
** Changed in: duplicity (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = New
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
This of course includes a request for librsync right? The package
builds both I presume.
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
err, nevermind. I thought for some reason librsync meant python-rsync
which doesn't even exist. I'm insane after all.
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
whardier, upstream has released 0.4.9 on 2008-01-04 and I'll request a
sync of duplicity for Hardy once it's in unstable (as a new bug report).
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Please sync to new lenny/sid packages. 0.4.8 ads a very vital mode
called 'remove-all-but-n-full' as well as a backup option called
'--full-if-older-than'.. These changes make writing a daily backup
script incredibly easy, and can insure that all incremental backups are
always *after* a full
Synced.
** Changed in: duplicity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Ack from me.
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: changelog diff with -uwB (ignoring whitespace)
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9464031/changelog.diff
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: diffstat.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9464017/diffstat.txt
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: pbuilder.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9464033/pbuilder.log
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
Sorry for not attaching the proper information before.
I'm hoping that now all required info is available.
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
What testing have you done with the new package?
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I've tested it on my server (Ubuntu Feisty, using the FTP backend) and have
just tested it locally (Gutsy) for a file://-type backup.
There should be no regressions, but a lot of bugfixes instead.
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You
There is no way Im going to accept this without including the proper
information.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#head-
9523bc4076ff011324d67cddc97969ec609618d6
--
[UFVe] Please sync duplicity from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141327
You received this bug
16 matches
Mail list logo
