[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-08-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package openldap - 2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu1 --- openldap (2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium * Merge from Debian testing (LP: #1471831). Remaining changes: - Enable AppArmor support: - d/apparmor-profile: add AppArmor profile - d/rules:

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-08-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package openldap - 2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu1 --- openldap (2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium * Merge from Debian testing (LP: #1471831). Remaining changes: - Enable AppArmor support: - d/apparmor-profile: add AppArmor profile - d/rules:

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-07-06 Thread Kartik Subbarao
This bug can be closed out now in favor of just building a new package for 2.4.41, since that release is now available and includes the fix: http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-07-06 Thread Kartik Subbarao
This bug can be closed out now in favor of just building a new package for 2.4.41, since that release is now available and includes the fix: http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-06-25 Thread Kartik Subbarao
Any response on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1461276 Title: off-by-one in LDIF length To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-06-25 Thread Kartik Subbarao
Any response on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1461276 Title: off-by-one in LDIF length To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-06-03 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Which upstream releases are affected, please? Is it just 2.4.40, and thus just Wily? Or are 2.4.28 and/or 2.4.31 affected as well? ** Summary changed: - Requesting ITS#8003 inclusion in 2.4.40 package +

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-06-03 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Which upstream releases are affected, please? Is it just 2.4.40, and thus just Wily? Or are 2.4.28 and/or 2.4.31 affected as well? ** Summary changed: - Requesting ITS#8003 inclusion in 2.4.40 package +

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-06-03 Thread Kartik Subbarao
I have run both 2.4.31 and 2.4.40 for a few days, and have only experienced this type of slapd crash with 2.4.40. That by itself isn't conclusive though, since memory corruption errors can be sensitive in how they manifest. Looking at the code briefly, I see that the same off- by-one error in

[Bug 1461276] Re: off-by-one in LDIF length

2015-06-03 Thread Kartik Subbarao
I have run both 2.4.31 and 2.4.40 for a few days, and have only experienced this type of slapd crash with 2.4.40. That by itself isn't conclusive though, since memory corruption errors can be sensitive in how they manifest. Looking at the code briefly, I see that the same off- by-one error in