This package has been removed from Ubuntu. Closing all related bugs.
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146167
** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Triaged
** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: gst-plugins-ugly-multiverse0.10 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: gst-plugins-ugly-multiverse0.10 (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
Installing codecs exposes bad and ugly terminology
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146167
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Also affects: gst-plugins-ugly-multiverse0.10 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gst-plugins-ugly0.10 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also
I have marked this as affecting gst-
plugins-{bad,good,ugly}{,-multiverse}0.10 as a means of suggesting that
the short package descriptions for these packages should be changed in
accordance with Matt Zimmerman's suggestion in comment #12. Regardless
of whether the removal of the Apply these
Again, what gnome-app-install should do is described in the initial
report: Since I've already clicked the 'Install' button, don't show the
'Apply the following changes?' window at all.
** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Installing codecs exposes bad
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:32:01AM -, Michael Vogt wrote:
What should gnome-app-install do about this? The description of the
gst-plugins-bad0.10 is:
Description: GStreamer plugins from the bad set
GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters
...
So the short
What should gnome-app-install do about this? The description of the
gst-plugins-bad0.10 is:
Description: GStreamer plugins from the bad set
GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters
...
So the short description has the word bad in it pretty prominently. I
would
Showing the description should be implemented in gnome-app-install.
What would you propose for the description? Would this solve this bug?
GStreamer plugins from the non-free (ugly) set
GStreamer plugins from the unstable (bad) set
GStreamer plugins from the stable (good) set
Or would you remove
** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None = gstreamer0.10
--
Installing codecs exposes bad and ugly terminology
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146167
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
TerryG wrote:
Triaged to Confirmed. I like spaghetti westerns as well, but to anyone
who hasn't seen The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly staring Clint
Eastwood, would be lost on what ugly means. At some point the names
could be changed. It's up to the gstreamer developers or the Ubuntu
Triaged to Confirmed. I like spaghetti westerns as well, but to anyone
who hasn't seen The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly staring Clint
Eastwood, would be lost on what ugly means. At some point the names
could be changed. It's up to the gstreamer developers or the Ubuntu
packaging team to make
Emilio, someone who is (rightly) alarmed when we call software bad
would be even more alarmed if we called it unstable AND bad. So no,
that wouldn't solve the problem, it would make it worse. :-)
--
Installing codecs exposes bad and ugly terminology
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146167
You
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
Emilio, someone who is (rightly) alarmed when we call software bad
would be even more alarmed if we called it unstable AND bad. So no,
that wouldn't solve the problem, it would make it worse. :-)
heh, right. Perhaps the same but removing bad/ugly/good. Although I
I think stable, experimental, and nonfree (as suggested by Sean)
would be fine, and those names should be used upstream. But as I said in
the initial report, Ubuntu shouldn't be showing the Apply the following
changes? window at all.
--
Installing codecs exposes bad and ugly terminology
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
I think stable, experimental, and nonfree (as suggested by Sean)
would be fine, and those names should be used upstream.
Forward it to upstream them ;-)
But as I said in
the initial report, Ubuntu shouldn't be showing the Apply the following
changes? window at
Googling for codec good bad ugly returned as its first result,
http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=537. This has a reply from the
GStreamer release manager about the decision.
The first comment to this blog post suggests that it would have been
clearer to use the names:
plugins-stable
Meanwhile, it should be possible to change the package descriptions
(they should be more descriptive anyway), and show those exclusively
(and not the package names) in the UI
--
Installing codecs exposes bad and ugly terminology
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146167
You received this bug
It's difficult to justify diverging from upstream here, but we should
support changing the name upstream
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Installing codecs exposes bad and ugly terminology
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146167
You received this bug notification because
19 matches
Mail list logo
