[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2016-01-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for lxc (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1470580

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2016-01-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for lxc (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-11-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
So was this bug just about you reaching the quota and LXC failing then? Just checking whether there's an actual bug we need to fix ASAP or if it's just about better error handling. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-11-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
So was this bug just about you reaching the quota and LXC failing then? Just checking whether there's an actual bug we need to fix ASAP or if it's just about better error handling. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-07 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting god (1470...@bugs.launchpad.net): Thanks for clarification! Would be kinda helpful if lxc-start could print actual numbers (X quota configured for bridge123, Y is in use). Agreed, this would be a huge improvement. Would you like to re-title this bug to turn it into a feature request

Re: [Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-07 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting god (1470...@bugs.launchpad.net): Thanks for clarification! Would be kinda helpful if lxc-start could print actual numbers (X quota configured for bridge123, Y is in use). Agreed, this would be a huge improvement. Would you like to re-title this bug to turn it into a feature request

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-07 Thread god
Thanks for clarification! Would be kinda helpful if lxc-start could print actual numbers (X quota configured for bridge123, Y is in use). What's the upper limit on those quota numbers? Can I have 100 bridges with 400 interfaces in each? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-07 Thread god
Thanks for clarification! Would be kinda helpful if lxc-start could print actual numbers (X quota configured for bridge123, Y is in use). What's the upper limit on those quota numbers? Can I have 100 bridges with 400 interfaces in each? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
cat /etc/lxc/lxc-usernet # USERNAME TYPE BRIDGE COUNT x veth ibr1 8 x veth xbr1 8 x veth ubr1 8 cat .local/share/lxc/asterisk/config # Template used to create this

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
Also, what does Quota reached. mean? What kind of quota is that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1470580 Title: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge To

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
cat /etc/lxc/lxc-usernet # USERNAME TYPE BRIDGE COUNT x veth ibr1 8 x veth xbr1 8 x veth ubr1 8 cat .local/share/lxc/asterisk/config # Template used to create this

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
Btw, is there a way to make logging to actually work and log everything? Maybe add --logging-indeed-log or smth like that in addition to existing -l and --logfile? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
Also, what does Quota reached. mean? What kind of quota is that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1470580 Title: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge To manage

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
Btw, is there a way to make logging to actually work and log everything? Maybe add --logging-indeed-log or smth like that in addition to existing -l and --logfile? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
lxc-start -n asterisk -F Quota reached. lxc-start: start.c: lxc_spawn: 1000 failed to create configured network lxc-start: start.c: __lxc_start: 1164 failed to spawn 'asterisk' lxc-start: start.c: main: 344 The container failed to start. lxc-start: start.c: main 348 Additional information can be

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread god
lxc-start -n asterisk -F Quota reached. lxc-start: start.c: lxc_spawn: 1000 failed to create configured network lxc-start: start.c: __lxc_start: 1164 failed to spawn 'asterisk' lxc-start: start.c: main: 344 The container failed to start. lxc-start: start.c: main 348 Additional information can be

Re: [Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting god (1470...@bugs.launchpad.net): Also, what does Quota reached. mean? What kind of quota is that? The last number in /etc/lxc/lxc-usernic gives the # nics which the user may connect to the specified bridge. The active connections are listed in /run/lxc/nics. If Quota Reached is seen

Re: [Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-06 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting god (1470...@bugs.launchpad.net): Also, what does Quota reached. mean? What kind of quota is that? The last number in /etc/lxc/lxc-usernic gives the # nics which the user may connect to the specified bridge. The active connections are listed in /run/lxc/nics. If Quota Reached is seen

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-03 Thread Serge Hallyn
Indeed, on every error path lxc_user_nic should print an error message to stderr, but that doesn't end up in the log. If you simply do lxc-start -n container_name -F What do you see? On one failure case I see Quota reached, for instance. When I copy/paste your network config excerpt, it does

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-03 Thread Serge Hallyn
Indeed, on every error path lxc_user_nic should print an error message to stderr, but that doesn't end up in the log. If you simply do lxc-start -n container_name -F What do you see? On one failure case I see Quota reached, for instance. When I copy/paste your network config excerpt, it does

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-02 Thread god
Commenting those 2 lines change nothing - same error. Is there way to figure out what exactly went wrong while creating network? The log seems way too brief about it even with debug enabled. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1470580] Re: unprivileged lxc containers fails with custom bridge

2015-07-02 Thread god
Commenting those 2 lines change nothing - same error. Is there way to figure out what exactly went wrong while creating network? The log seems way too brief about it even with debug enabled. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification