[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-09-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-09-01 06:09 EDT--- Today I installed the latest ubuntu 14.04.3 on pole2lp2, this bug is fixed. Thanks. root@pole2lp2:~# apt-get install samba Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-09-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-09-01 06:09 EDT--- Today I installed the latest ubuntu 14.04.3 on pole2lp2, this bug is fixed. Thanks. root@pole2lp2:~# apt-get install samba Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-08-18 10:21 EDT--- With Breno's help, leeklp3 is installed the lastest version of samba smbclient (2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9) and this bug is fixed. Thanks, Breno. :) root@leeklp3:~# smbclient -L leeklp3 -U root Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix]

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-08-18 10:21 EDT--- With Breno's help, leeklp3 is installed the lastest version of samba smbclient (2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9) and this bug is fixed. Thanks, Breno. :) root@leeklp3:~# smbclient -L leeklp3 -U root Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix]

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-08-17 09:53 EDT--- Miao, The documentation is quite complete at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed. I also told you that the package is 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9 and not 2:4.1.6+dfsg- 1ubuntu2.14.04.9. Did you looked for it? BTW, If

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-08-17 09:53 EDT--- Miao, The documentation is quite complete at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed. I also told you that the package is 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9 and not 2:4.1.6+dfsg- 1ubuntu2.14.04.9. Did you looked for it? BTW, If

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-08-17 07:35 EDT--- (In reply to comment #51) 3. Couldn't find package samba=2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. The package version is 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. You can find the binaries at:

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-08-17 07:35 EDT--- (In reply to comment #51) 3. Couldn't find package samba=2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. The package version is 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. You can find the binaries at:

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-08-15 16:31 EDT--- 3. Couldn't find package samba=2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. The package version is 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. You can find the binaries at: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.1.6+dfsg-

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-08-15 16:31 EDT--- 3. Couldn't find package samba=2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. The package version is 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9. You can find the binaries at: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.1.6+dfsg-

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-08-14 09:09 EDT--- Hi, I failed to install package samba=2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9 by following the steps in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed . Please correct me if I did something wrong. Thanks. 1. Modify file

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-08-14 09:09 EDT--- Hi, I failed to install package samba=2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.9 by following the steps in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed . Please correct me if I did something wrong. Thanks. 1. Modify file

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From amda...@us.ibm.com 2015-08-10 18:59 EDT--- Hi Dave, Update from bug call today we discussed on the call today with Michael Hohnbaum that Diane has help prioritize some of the bugs. This one is on Canonical's list but others are taking higher priority since this one is

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From amda...@us.ibm.com 2015-08-10 18:59 EDT--- Hi Dave, Update from bug call today we discussed on the call today with Michael Hohnbaum that Diane has help prioritize some of the bugs. This one is on Canonical's list but others are taking higher priority since this one is

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-08-04 15:52 EDT--- Hi Canonical. Can we get this addressed with some higher priority, please? This has been open for several weeks and all the necessary info was really provided from the start.. It looks like the problem is reproducible on a

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-08-04 15:52 EDT--- Hi Canonical. Can we get this addressed with some higher priority, please? This has been open for several weeks and all the necessary info was really provided from the start.. It looks like the problem is reproducible on a

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-08-03 17:08 EDT--- I just documented this failure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ppc64el/Recommendations#Samba_on_14.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-08-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-08-03 17:08 EDT--- I just documented this failure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ppc64el/Recommendations#Samba_on_14.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From nad...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-30 14:34 EDT--- The GA is just a few days away. From the last hot bug call, Breno would document this issue on the Canonical wiki Power page while we continue to pursue the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From nad...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-30 14:34 EDT--- The GA is just a few days away. From the last hot bug call, Breno would document this issue on the Canonical wiki Power page while we continue to pursue the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-30 05:56 EDT--- (In reply to comment #41) (In reply to comment #36) Hi, Ubuntu 14.04.3 is the first build for power system. I'm not sure if the early version supports power system. This is the first version that fully supports PowerVM

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-30 05:56 EDT--- (In reply to comment #41) (In reply to comment #36) Hi, Ubuntu 14.04.3 is the first build for power system. I'm not sure if the early version supports power system. This is the first version that fully supports PowerVM

Re: [Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-29 Thread Steve Langasek
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-28 02:38 EDT--- (In reply to comment #36) Hi, Ubuntu 14.04.3 is the first build for power system. I'm not sure if the early version supports power system. This is the first version that fully supports PowerVM mode, but the issue has also

Re: [Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-29 Thread Steve Langasek
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-28 02:38 EDT--- (In reply to comment #36) Hi, Ubuntu 14.04.3 is the first build for power system. I'm not sure if the early version supports power system. This is the first version that fully supports PowerVM mode, but the issue has also

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-07-29 19:52 EDT--- I just tried this on a ppc64le machine with the latest samba packages and what looks like the latest kernel. It worked fine: root@palm6-p1:~# lsb_release -r Release: 14.10 So, it seems that the problem does not happen

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-07-29 19:52 EDT--- I just tried this on a ppc64le machine with the latest samba packages and what looks like the latest kernel. It worked fine: root@palm6-p1:~# lsb_release -r Release: 14.10 So, it seems that the problem does not happen

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-07-27 17:15 EDT--- The same problem happen on 14.04.2 with 3.16 kernel: ubuntu@ubuntu14042:~$ smbclient -L localhost -U root Enter root's password: protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT ubuntu@ubuntu14042:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu140402

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bren...@br.ibm.com 2015-07-27 17:15 EDT--- The same problem happen on 14.04.2 with 3.16 kernel: ubuntu@ubuntu14042:~$ smbclient -L localhost -U root Enter root's password: protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT ubuntu@ubuntu14042:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu140402

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-28 02:38 EDT--- (In reply to comment #36) This is a userspace tool and we certainly would not expect there to be any differences in the behavior as a result of running on an earlier kernel. However, there have been stable release updates

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-28 02:38 EDT--- (In reply to comment #36) This is a userspace tool and we certainly would not expect there to be any differences in the behavior as a result of running on an earlier kernel. However, there have been stable release updates

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-17 14:18 EDT--- Hi Canonical, Can we get this assigned to someone who can look at it please? Apparently I don't have privileges to change the status on the launchpad side, and that's not really our role anyway. Thx. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-17 14:18 EDT--- Hi Canonical, Can we get this assigned to someone who can look at it please? Apparently I don't have privileges to change the status on the launchpad side, and that's not really our role anyway. Thx. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-17 03:06 EDT--- This bug blocks our cifs stress test. Any update? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472584 Title: ISST-LTE:

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-17 03:06 EDT--- This bug blocks our cifs stress test. Any update? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472584

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-14 02:47 EDT--- Hi, We installed a new fresh system dilllp1 and this bug is still exist. root@dilllp1:~# /etc/init.d/smbd status * smbd is running root@dilllp1:~# smbclient -L dilllp1 Enter root's password: protocol negotiation failed:

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-14 02:47 EDT--- Hi, We installed a new fresh system dilllp1 and this bug is still exist. root@dilllp1:~# /etc/init.d/smbd status * smbd is running root@dilllp1:~# smbclient -L dilllp1 Enter root's password: protocol negotiation failed:

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-13 15:18 EDT--- Hi Robie, I think we have provided the steps to reproduce, and the expected vs. actual result, and also verbose debug output from samba on the client- side and the server-side. I can't explain why it's not reproducible on your

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-13 15:18 EDT--- Hi Robie, I think we have provided the steps to reproduce, and the expected vs. actual result, and also verbose debug output from samba on the client- side and the server-side. I can't explain why it's not reproducible on your

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-13 03:15 EDT--- We reached this bug on a fresh install and we didn't modify the samba config file. The following is the samba packages we installed and the version. root@pole2lp1:~# apt-cache search ^samba libwbclient-dev - Samba winbind client

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-13 03:15 EDT--- We reached this bug on a fresh install and we didn't modify the samba config file. The following is the samba packages we installed and the version. root@pole2lp1:~# apt-cache search ^samba libwbclient-dev - Samba winbind client

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-10 06:49 EDT--- (In reply to comment #16) Well, I'm quickly exhausting my samba expertise here. I don't know how to interpret all the debug messages but I'll say: your output doesn't really contain anything different from mine, and on my

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-10 06:49 EDT--- (In reply to comment #16) Well, I'm quickly exhausting my samba expertise here. I don't know how to interpret all the debug messages but I'll say: your output doesn't really contain anything different from mine, and on my

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-10 22:24 EDT--- Testing samba server running on the local host: Expected result is like this (working system): root@cellc10:~# smbclient -L cellc10 -U root Enter root's password: Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.6-Ubuntu]

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-10 22:24 EDT--- Testing samba server running on the local host: Expected result is like this (working system): root@cellc10:~# smbclient -L cellc10 -U root Enter root's password: Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.6-Ubuntu]

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-09 15:19 EDT--- Well, I'm quickly exhausting my samba expertise here. I don't know how to interpret all the debug messages but I'll say: your output doesn't really contain anything different from mine, and on my system everything seems to be

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-09 15:19 EDT--- Well, I'm quickly exhausting my samba expertise here. I don't know how to interpret all the debug messages but I'll say: your output doesn't really contain anything different from mine, and on my system everything seems to be

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From nad...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-08 15:50 EDT--- This bug is blocking our NFS testing. Need quick attention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472584

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From nad...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-08 15:50 EDT--- This bug is blocking our NFS testing. Need quick attention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472584 Title:

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-08 17:57 EDT--- Please provide output from the following: cat /etc/services | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp netstat -l | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp lsof | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp ps awfux | egrep smb[d]|nmb[d] I'm guessing the cups errors

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-08 17:57 EDT--- Please provide output from the following: cat /etc/services | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp netstat -l | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp lsof | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp ps awfux | egrep smb[d]|nmb[d] I'm guessing the cups errors

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From carri...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-08 19:23 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) Please provide output from the following: cat /etc/services | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp netstat -l | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp lsof | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp ps awfux | egrep smb[d]|nmb[d]

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From carri...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-08 19:23 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) Please provide output from the following: cat /etc/services | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp netstat -l | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp lsof | egrep netbios|microsoft|ipp ps awfux | egrep smb[d]|nmb[d]

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-09 03:01 EDT--- (In reply to comment #13) Not sure what to suggest next except to increase the debug level of smbd and repeat the operation. You can edit /etc/init/smbd.conf and add -d 10 to the exec smbd cmdline. Then: service smbd restart

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From fen...@cn.ibm.com 2015-07-09 03:01 EDT--- (In reply to comment #13) Not sure what to suggest next except to increase the debug level of smbd and repeat the operation. You can edit /etc/init/smbd.conf and add -d 10 to the exec smbd cmdline. Then: service smbd restart

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-09 02:09 EDT--- Not sure what to suggest next except to increase the debug level of smbd and repeat the operation. You can edit /etc/init/smbd.conf and add -d 10 to the exec smbd cmdline. Then: service smbd restart tail -f

[Bug 1472584] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-08 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From helle...@us.ibm.com 2015-07-09 02:09 EDT--- Not sure what to suggest next except to increase the debug level of smbd and repeat the operation. You can edit /etc/init/smbd.conf and add -d 10 to the exec smbd cmdline. Then: service smbd restart tail -f