[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2018-06-27 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
We provide newer ethtool with newer kernels in newer releases. So e.g. 4.15 in Bionic along the kernel with the same number. This also is the reason this is now owned by the kernel team. But AFAIK there are no plans to provide backports of ethtool along the HWE kernels (SRUs would have wuite

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2018-06-27 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
Subscribing a few kernel people to decide on further activity on this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533721 Title: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb To

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2017-09-13 Thread Jeff Lane
This is over a year and a half old at this point. IS there a status update for this issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533721 Title: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2017-07-07 Thread Jeff Lane
To fix this, update ethtool in Ubuntu to the later versions. I have run into this issue now in Cert when customers are testing higher end NIC devices. The current version in Xenial is 4.5, and it looks like the current version in Artful is 4.8. My customer tested this with 4.11 and you can see

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-06-16 Thread Dragan S.
** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dragan S. (dragan-s) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533721 Title: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-02-04 Thread Talat Batheesh
Hi, unfortunately, ethtool header does not currently support link speeds 25/50/100/200, therefore these speeds cannot be seen as dvertised/supported. See this artical that will also expain the issue and suggest a fix. https://lwn.net/Articles/672517/ This commit is an example of adding

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-02-04 Thread Talat Batheesh
Hi, unfortunately, ethtool header does not currently support link speeds 25/50/100/200, therefore these speeds cannot be seen as dvertised/supported. See this artical that will also expain the issue and suggest a fix. https://lwn.net/Articles/672517/ This commit is an example of adding

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-02-03 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
After talking to Talat: - What Ubuntu version are you referring to ? [TB]Ubuntu 14.4.4 trusty - Have you tested in newer versions ? [TB] not tested yet, will test it on Xenial and update. - What are the steps to reproduce the problem ? [TB] ethtool See that under "Advertised link

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-02-03 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
After talking to Talat: - What Ubuntu version are you referring to ? [TB]Ubuntu 14.4.4 trusty - Have you tested in newer versions ? [TB] not tested yet, will test it on Xenial and update. - What are the steps to reproduce the problem ? [TB] ethtool See that under "Advertised link

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-01-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
Those are all the advertised flags defined by the kernel. This does not prevent forcing higher link speeds, only enabling auto-negotiation of those speeds. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ethtool in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-01-19 Thread dino99
** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ethtool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533721 Title: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-01-19 Thread dino99
** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533721 Title: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb To

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-01-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
Those are all the advertised flags defined by the kernel. This does not prevent forcing higher link speeds, only enabling auto-negotiation of those speeds. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-01-19 Thread Tim Gardner
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => ethtool (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533721 Title: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb To manage notifications

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-01-19 Thread Tim Gardner
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => ethtool (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ethtool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533721 Title: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb To

[Bug 1533721] Re: Ethtool didn't support link speed 25Gb 56Gb 100Gb 200Gb

2016-01-14 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest v4.4 kernel[0]. If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'. If the mainline kernel does not fix