[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-06-02 Thread Pat McGowan
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554040 Title: Allow hiding authentication data in scope

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-05-22 Thread Marcus Tomlinson
** Branch unlinked: lp:unity-scopes-api/staging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554040 Title: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-05-06 Thread Pat McGowan
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-04-13 Thread Marcus Tomlinson
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554040 Title: Allow hiding authentication data in scope

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-04-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package unity-scopes-api - 1.0.4+16.04.20160402.4-0ubuntu1 --- unity-scopes-api (1.0.4+16.04.20160402.4-0ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium [ Marcus Tomlinson ] * Simplify debian/control munging. Look for clang-format as opposed to clang-format-3.x.

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-04-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554040 Title: Allow hiding authentication data in scope

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-04-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
** Also affects: canonical-devices-system-image Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in:

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-04-05 Thread Marcus Tomlinson
** Branch linked: lp:unity-scopes-api/staging ** Also affects: unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High **

Re: [Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-03-15 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 15/03/2016 04:01, James Henstridge wrote: > If you're patching client IDs into a program from the debian/ directory, > surely it would be just as easy to patch them into the service file as > into the source code though, right? Absolutely. But some people do argue (while I try hard to avoid

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-03-14 Thread James Henstridge
If you're patching client IDs into a program from the debian/ directory, surely it would be just as easy to patch them into the service file as into the source code though, right? As for Ubuntu One OAuth code, I agree that it's OAuth code is weirdly non-standard (I filed bug 978719 about it way

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-03-14 Thread Alberto Mardegan
The importance is a bit arbitrary. From the security point of view, there is really no benefit in having this feature. However, there is a real case for it, because service providers might have some guidelines on where the application keys can appear and where they cannot: I recall Ken telling me

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-03-14 Thread James Henstridge
Mardy: if this doesn't actually improve security, why is this bug marked high importance? Is there any particular user who is calling for this feature? Are there any online services we are talking to that require this kind of obfuscation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-03-10 Thread Alberto Mardegan
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alberto Mardegan (mardy) -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-03-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~mardy/unity-scopes-shell/clientid-1554040 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554040 Title: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary To manage

[Bug 1554040] Re: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary

2016-03-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~mardy/unity-scopes-api/clientid-1554040 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554040 Title: Allow hiding authentication data in scope binary To manage notifications