[Bug 1576449] Re: Samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu ls Windows 10 cli_list: Error: unable to parse name from info level 260

2016-05-05 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Great, I'm closing this bug. Thanks! ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576449 Title: Samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu ls Windows 10

[Bug 1576449] Re: Samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu ls Windows 10 cli_list: Error: unable to parse name from info level 260

2016-05-05 Thread Jeremy Null
This fixed it! Samba is connecting great again to my Windows 10 machines and they're all backing up now. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576449 Title: Samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu

[Bug 1576449] Re: Samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu ls Windows 10 cli_list: Error: unable to parse name from info level 260

2016-05-04 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Today's Samba update should contain the fix for this issue, could the original bug reporter please test the update and comment here? http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2950-2/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1576449] Re: Samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu ls Windows 10 cli_list: Error: unable to parse name from info level 260

2016-05-02 Thread Jeremy Null
No, it's post/aside-from the 4.3 security update. It happened both before/and after the update. Plus, I believe their patch is for any 4.3.x and 4.4.x versions. Double check me on that though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1576449] Re: Samba 4.3.8-Ubuntu ls Windows 10 cli_list: Error: unable to parse name from info level 260

2016-04-29 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report and for pointing to the upstream bug/patch. Is that a regression from the 4.3 security update? (assigning to the security team under that understanding, but if that's not one it should probably be handled as a normal SRU instead) ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)