[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-05-27 Thread Simon Iremonger
FWIW: e2fsprogs PPA created and discussion of backports/updates should happen 
on this linked-bug:-
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1365874  -- if you are 
interested in xenial/older e2fsprogs compatibility please subscribe to that bug 
#1365874 .

I also spotted e2fsprogs 1.44.2 has fix against crashing from malicious-
filesystems, remains to be seen if this and further future fixes may
ultimately warrant update to bionic's 1.44.1 .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:08:36PM -, Simon Iremonger wrote:

> Given what you say, can you consider Tytso's request to put 1.44.0
> e2fsprogs into Bionic.  This allows for not-enabled-by-default for
> support of 2 extra ext4 flags in e2fsprogs,  thereby avoiding this
> situation happening again for 20.04 with respect to THOSE flags...

I've filed a feature freeze exception request for this issue.

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1756177

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-15 Thread Simon Iremonger
Steve:

Given what you say, can you consider Tytso's request to put 1.44.0
e2fsprogs into Bionic.  This allows for not-enabled-by-default for
support of 2 extra ext4 flags in e2fsprogs,  thereby avoiding this
situation happening again for 20.04 with respect to THOSE flags...

As TJ- said, be good to get it in for LTS release from the off.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1365874/comments/17

[maybe that should be handled in the other bug as above].

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-15 Thread Steve Langasek
This has been evaluated by the Foundations team and we do not intend to
diverge from upstream's defaults for 18.04.  The incompatibility between
LTSes is not ideal, but is secondary to being able to improve the
filesystem defaults across LTS releases.

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-14 Thread Simon Iremonger
Initial comments from the email:-

a)  There is some confusion over "metadata_csum" with/without "64bit". -- Those 
who have 'reverted' are usually reverting BOTH flags [as I've done some 
places], not just metadata_csum.
My understanding is 64bit is of no benefit except support >16TB fs and to 
strengthen metadata_csum's [if used, which help notice dodgy disks in theory.].

b)  The business of including e2fsprogs-1.44.0 in 18.04 at tytso's
request [NON-default extra feature support may benefit Samba users etc.
later] is not addressed.

c)  Its' worth pointing-out explicitly e2fsprogs only enabled
64bit,metadata_csum 'by default' for 'everybody' within last few weeks,
Debian change was as-you-rightly-quote.

d)  Considering the above, also think outside the ubuntu-box!  What do
canonical's customers/partners expect compatibility-wise with other non-
ubuntu systems, virtualizers/ISCSI-hosts/etc (e2fsprogs 1.42 still very
common!), let alone "backports to ubuntu LTS versions" only?.

e)  My understanding from TJ in IRC is he's started doing some tests on
some datacentre cases, there are particular issues with things like
ISCSI hosts, the host system needs to fsck guest-FS and break
otherwise!.  HOPEFULLY this will appear soon and can be added to the
mail-discussion.

I can try to join email/post directly to mail if appropriate/helpful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-14 Thread Robie Basak
I posted to the mailing list about this:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-March/040230.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: rls-bb-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-10 Thread Simon Iremonger
Can we pay-attention, to this thread (now) being about considering the
feature-flags 'used by default' in mke2fs.conf, in consideration to
18.04 --  [linked bug for e2fsprogs].

We know massive 'compatibility'/portability benefit of formatting the
same as previous-LTS by default, as the required e2fsprogs was only
introduced 16.10, and the needed kernel was only in 16.04 (and 14.04
-HWE-kernel-update.).  NB: Looks like there is a similar issue with
GRUB2 which affects dual-booters, grub2 2.02beta3 may be needed to
support 64bit FS.  If so, again Xenial isn't compatible to detect an
18.04 in multi-boot-menu.

I'd like tytso to comment on the downsides of formatting without
64bit,metadata_csum, more specifically.  From what I can (see) this only
loses a little extra checksumming-integrity (against bad disks, which
we've never needed before??), and the 64bit feature appears only to be
needed to strengthen these checksums or support >16TB disks (bearing in
mind auto_64bit_support can still be used).  NB: Is this correct, -OR-
is there likely going to be future annoyances with 'other' ext4
features-to-come which will ALSO expect 64bit formatting?.

My suggestion is, this hasn't been sorted-out enough in the ubuntu-
world, and 64bit,metadata_csum should be disabled-by-default for 18.04
and backporting grub/e2fsprogs/etc where relevant should happen as well
[see other thread, possibly another may be created for grub2].

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-10 Thread Theodore Ts'o
E2fsprogs 1.44.0 now depends on dpkg build-profiles, which means that
getting it backported to 14.04 LTS would require adjusting
debian/control and debian/rules a bit.   For 14.04 LTS, I'd urge
consideration of going to e2fsprogs 1.43.9.   This will get you most of
the latest bug fixes, including some that could cause massive file
system corruption and data loss (relative to e2fsprogs 1.42.x) in the
right (wrong) circumstances.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

2018-03-10 Thread TJ
** Summary changed:

- Ubuntu 16.10 installer sets metadata_csum option on ext4 partition which is 
incompatible with other LTS Ubuntu versions
+ Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is 
incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.10+ installer uses ext4 feature 'metadata_csum' which is
  incompatible with older (LTS) e2fsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs