[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

@zolika84 please start a new bug with details of what you expect/fail to see from snapd on those systems, we don't explicitly support WSL2 yet, there are some forum topics around that explain how you can make it work, but snapd doesn't work OOTB in WSL2. I'm not sure what the issue is with running

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Issue is still the same - the issue comes out when you try to run snapd on a chromebook (linux terminal), or in WSL2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Indeed snapd carries this on its own. ** Changed in: snappy Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

As for host restrictions I need to use LXC too (not lxd), what I needed to get this working was just: lxc config as: # Mount local kernel modules dir, snap needs it for its bind-mount lxc.mount.entry = /lib/modules lib/modules none bind,create=dir,optional 0 0 # Mounting fuse (for snap

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

My understand of the status is that snapd grew its own code for mounting snaps via fuse, which would make this MIR unnecessary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

This MIR has been completed, but squashfuse is still not in main (and apparently not Depend-ed on by snapd). None of the referenced bugs mentions squashfuse, what is the status of this? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: snappy Status: In

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Bug 1756173 is set to put 2.32 into bionic and SRU to trusty, xenial, and artful. So if you're interested in this fix, watch that bug. ** Description changed: We're finally making progress on the apparmor stacking and snapd in container front. The next LXD release will include the needed

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

I removed the "snap" package bug task, as I doubt this bug affects the gene finder. ** No longer affects: snap (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

** Also affects: snap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: snap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: snap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: snap (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: snap

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

This is fixed in snapd under https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/4049 It will be fixed in snapd 2.31.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Following previous discussions and proposals I understand there are some issues with getting 'squashfuse' installed automatically for container workloads. In the meantime, for improved UX, would having "snap install" command inform operator of 'squashfuse' dependency for in-container operation be

Re: [Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:25:49PM +0300, Marat Khalili wrote: > > The problem in your case is that you're trying to get this to work with LXC > > rather than LXD. > > Should I understand it as snapd is not currently supported under LXC? No way > to reproduce manually in LXC whatever LXD does?

Re: [Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

> The problem in your case is that you're trying to get this to work with LXC rather than LXD. Should I understand it as snapd is not currently supported under LXC? No way to reproduce manually in LXC whatever LXD does? > I'd very strongly recommend against anyone using the configuration above

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

The problem in your case is that you're trying to get this to work with LXC rather than LXD. LXD images ship with a /lib/modules directory, ship with fuse pre- installed, LXD sets up /dev/fuse by default for you and comes with apparmor namespacing support so the container can load apparmor

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

My problem was solved by: 1. Adding the following lines to the container config, then stopping and starting the container: --- # Make snapd work lxc.aa_profile = unconfined # don't drop: mac_admin mac_override lxc.cap.drop = lxc.cap.drop = sys_time sys_module sys_rawio lxc.hook.autodev = sh

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

--- root@test:/# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS Release:16.04 Codename: xenial root@test:/# apt install squashfuse Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Responding to comments #36 and #37, I can confirm that a xenial container (x1) in a xenial host can install snaps after you install squashfuse. Without squashfuse: root@x1:~# snap install hello-world error: cannot perform the following tasks: - Mount snap "core" (3247) ([start

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

It seems 16.10 and 17.04 are still affected by this problem. Don't know about 17.10 as I haven't been able to make it work properly under LXC/LXD with Juju. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

> Just to update my previous comment: poking around Stéphane Graber's blog a bit suggests to me that I really shouldn't expect success with this using less than 16.10. Can someone please confirm it is really true? Bug description contains Xenial, and this discussion --

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Just to update my previous comment: poking around Stéphane Graber's blog a bit suggests to me that I really shouldn't expect success with this using less than 16.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

I've installed squashfuse on my Ubuntu LXC container (under Ubuntu 16.04.2) and then tried to install the NextCloud snap, but it's still failing with this same error: error: cannot perform the following tasks: - Mount snap "core" (2381) ([start snap-core-2381.mount] failed with exit status 1:

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Hi, I am facing the same issue with Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS. I get the below error; @master:~$ sudo snap install conjure-up --classic error: cannot perform the following tasks: - Download snap "core" (2381) from channel "stable" (Get

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

squashfuse must be installed in the container that's going to run snapd not on the host, so it can't be a dependency of LXD itself. The image that's used for the LXD containers is an unmodified Ubuntu cloud image. If we do go with seeding squashfuse for this, it would mean that it would be

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

I understand this is high priority, but the PR you just wrote is a poor copy of the older one from February where we attempted the same thing, and it's just as wrong for the same reasons. Is there really no other way to pull squashfuse onto the lxd images? I don't know how they're built, but

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Here's a pull request: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3605 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers) To manage

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

This is high priority. ** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

You meant https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2856 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers) To manage notifications

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2830 ** Changed in: snappy Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

doko tells me that we now need snapd to depend on squashfuse so we can finish the promotion to main. mvo: Can you please do that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Autopkgtest added and passed in zesty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers) To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Should be easy enough to have an autopkgtest create a minimal squashfs filesystem and mount it, I'll upload something along those lines to Zesty. I'm assuming you don't need me to also SRU said autopkgtest to all the stable releases until we have something more user relevant to SRU right? -- You

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

MIR review: - this looks fine, but the package doesn't come with a testsuite. - would it be possible to add a simple autopkg test? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title:

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Yeah, a recommend would be absolutely fine here and wouldn't cause "apt upgrade" to hold snapd, if I recall correctly, that's in fact what I first requested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

We have to be careful with new dependencies because those cause issues for 'apt-get update'. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title:

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

As requested by mvo above, this bug is now the MIR for squashfuse. The same package is in zesty, yakkety and xenial so the result of the review should apply equally to all series. ## Paperwork Availability: in universe in all relevant series Rationale: required for snapd inside LXD containers

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

There is no point in SRUing to trusty so we won't be doing that. The reason is that trusty containers will never be able to run snapd inside them due to a decision not to enable apparmor nesting inside trusty containers. Trusty users are expected to run xenial containers if they care about

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Resetting bug status for MIR portion. I generally find it easier to follow MIR bugs when they are separate, but it's fine, we can do it here too. Doko, can you take this one? ** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New ** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Assignee:

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

I looked into this today and to move forward we need: - a MIR for squashfuse as snapd is in main - an upload of squashfuse to trusty because we support that as well now -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

** Changed in: snappy Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers) To manage

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Why was this marked as Fix released? As far as I can tell, snapd still doesn't depend on squashfuse... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

** Changed in: snappy Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: snappy Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Confirmed that squashfuse works as expected on Xenial. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Marking the squashfuse side of this bug as fix released. Now that squashfuse is available in xenial, yakkety and zesty, can someone please change snapd to depend on it so that users of snaps inside containers don't need to manually install it? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

This bug was fixed in the package squashfuse - 0.1.100-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1 --- squashfuse (0.1.100-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium * No-change backport to xenial (LP: #1628289) -- Stéphane Graber Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:08:47 -0400 ** Changed

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected, Accepted squashfuse into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squashfuse/0.1.100-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

@mark, oh, sorry, i should have mentioned that i was talking about images here :) not classic. for classic there need to be feature backports indeed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Superstars, thank you :) Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

The two kernel features we need for snaps in LXD are both scheduled for backporting to the 4.4 kernel once we're satisfied that they are stable in Yakkety's 4.8. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

We can't ask people to install a new kernel to get one part of LXD. That might work for 17.10, but not this soon after 16.04. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title:

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

kernel wise i was actually wondering if we shouldnt perhaps focus on the -hwe lts kernels (probably a valuable topic for the sprint), but i guess the 4.8 release from yakkety might be to late for us for GA to get enough testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

Uploaded to the xenial queue. ** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Stéphane Graber (stgraber) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1628289] Re: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in containers)

** Also affects: squashfuse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628289 Title: snapd should depend on squashfuse (for use in