Public bug reported:

Since google no longer bundles its pepperflash plugin with chrome's debs
(bug #1632870) the recommended way to get the plugin is by installing
adobe-flashplugin from the partner repository. However, since it also
includes the outdated NPAPI-plugin this will result in two flash-plugins
being installed to Firefox' plugin directory, due to the fact that
browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash and adobe-flashplugin doesn't use
the same alternative link, which they should.

In /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins there's currently two links:
flash-mozilla.so -> /etc/alternatives/flash-mozilla.so (installed by 
browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash)
flashplugin-alternative.so -> /etc/alternatives/mozilla-flashplugin (installed 
by adobe-flashplugin)

browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash should use the same alternatives-
link as the official package but with an higher priority, which would
eliminate the compability issue.

Also the recommend of pepperflashplugin-nonfree should be removed and
solely recommend adobe-flashplugin instead.

** Affects: freshplayerplugin (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Description changed:

  Since google no longer bundles its pepperflash plugin with chrome's debs
- (<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pepperflashplugin-
- nonfree/+bug/1632870">bug #1632870</a>) the recommended way to get the
- plugin is by installing adobe-flashplugin from the partner repository.
- However, since it also includes the outdated NPAPI-plugin this will
- result in two flash-plugins being installed to Firefox' plugin
- directory, due to the fact that browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash
- and adobe-flashplugin doesn't use the same alternative link, which they
- should.
+ (bug #1632870) the recommended way to get the plugin is by installing
+ adobe-flashplugin from the partner repository. However, since it also
+ includes the outdated NPAPI-plugin this will result in two flash-plugins
+ being installed to Firefox' plugin directory, due to the fact that
+ browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash and adobe-flashplugin doesn't use
+ the same alternative link, which they should.
  
  In /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins there's currently two links:
  flash-mozilla.so -> /etc/alternatives/flash-mozilla.so (installed by 
browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash)
  flashplugin-alternative.so -> /etc/alternatives/mozilla-flashplugin 
(installed by adobe-flashplugin)
  
  browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash should use the same alternatives-
  link as the official package but with an higher priority, which would
  eliminate the compability issue.
  
  Also the recommend of pepperflashplugin-nonfree should be removed and
  solely recommend adobe-flashplugin instead.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633678

Title:
  Compability issue with adobe-flashplugin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freshplayerplugin/+bug/1633678/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to