[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2018-07-23 Thread SunBear
My system had the following packages upgraded: Upgrade: linux-headers-generic:amd64 (4.4.0.130.136, 4.4.0.131.137), linux-libc-dev:amd64 (4.4.0-130.156, 4.4.0-131.157), linux-image- generic:amd64 (4.4.0.130.136, 4.4.0.131.137), linux-generic:amd64 (4.4.0.130.136, 4.4.0.131.137) After that, there

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2018-07-23 Thread SunBear
I am encountering the same after sudo apt update. . AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml Reading package lists... Done E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'if /usr/bin/test -w

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2018-07-01 Thread Maison da Silva
Same problem here AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success 'if /usr/bin/test -w /var/cache/app-info -a -e

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2017-04-25 Thread Robie Basak
Looks like this caused a regression in Xenial tracked in bug 1663695. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2017-01-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package appstream - 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 --- appstream (0.9.4-1ubuntu2) xenial; urgency=medium * yaml-parser-errors.patch: Deal with errors in the YAML structure in the best way possible. * modern-metadata.patch: Recognize and return modern AppStream

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2017-01-16 Thread Norman
Any chance this will be fixed before the 2nd point release of Ubuntu Xenial Xerus? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2017-01-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Eww, this dropped off my todo list accidentally between the years. Sorry guys, I'll update the patch soon so it can be distributed via the regular updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2017-01-11 Thread Numan Demirdöğen
I confirm that the bug is fixed. LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy appstream libappstream3 appstream: Installed: 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 Version table: 0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1 100 100 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports/main amd64 Packages ***

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-18 Thread Urijah
^ Anyway, I used the fix from proposed and it worked for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-17 Thread Urijah
Why hasn't the patch been pushed from Proposed yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The AppStream CI failure is an error on the tests and can be ignored (I can also provide a patch to fix that). The Isenkram issue looks very weird, since the GIR ABI hasn't been touched and it doesn't seem to operate on AppStream-specific stuff there - I will investigate that problem later. --

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-14 Thread Robie Basak
We have both success and not-fixed reports from -proposed testing. However, amongst those who reported not-fixed, I can't find any confirmation that the reporters did actually have both necessary -proposed packages updated, except for Tommy who confirmed that updating both packages did work. So

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-14 Thread Robie Basak
We do however have a couple of autopkgtest regressions. Please see http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/appstream/xenial/amd64 and http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/i/isenkram/xenial/amd64. Please could the people driving this SRU check those and comment? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-14 Thread Robie Basak
(these also impact other architectures - see http://people.canonical.com /~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-13 Thread B. T.
I'm getting the following error, yet I don't understand what I need to do about it. Help please. Thanks in advance. ** (appstreamcli:11741): DEBUG: Refreshing AppStream cache ** (appstreamcli:11741): DEBUG: Reading: /usr/share/app-info/xmls/org.freedesktop.fwupd.xml ** (appstreamcli:11741):

Re: [Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-09 Thread Tommy Berglund
Den 2016-12-09 kl. 18:39, skrev Matthias Klumpp: > Okay, what is the version of your libappstream3 package? You must have > updated both to the version in x-u-proposed, otherwise this patch > doesn't work. > Updated to libappstream3/xenial-proposed apt-cache policy libappstream3 libappstream3:

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, what is the version of your libappstream3 package? You must have updated both to the version in x-u-proposed, otherwise this patch doesn't work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-09 Thread Tommy Berglund
Den 2016-12-09 kl. 17:00, skrev Matthias Klumpp: > You skipped the important information... Please run `sudo appstreamcli > refresh --force --verbose` again and attach the *full* log to this > report (or paste it somewhere and link it here). > Ok, here is the link to the report file

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You skipped the important information... Please run `sudo appstreamcli refresh --force --verbose` again and attach the *full* log to this report (or paste it somewhere and link it here). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-09 Thread Tommy Berglund
I'm still getting the error after running apt-get update appstream: Installerad: 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 Kandidat:0.9.4-1ubuntu2 Versionstabell: 0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1 100 100 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports/main amd64 Packages *** 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 400

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@kalaora: Can you please run `sudo appstreamcli refresh --force --verbose` and paste the output somewhere? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-09 Thread kalaora
Hi, i'm still getting the error after running apt-get update : Réception de:100 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/restricted amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [201 B] 55,4 Mo réceptionnés en 8s (6 210 ko/s) AppStream cache update completed, but some

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-05 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-04 Thread Daemmon
Per post #25, the proposed fix worked for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@Nikolaos: The update isn't distributed for everyone yet, to actually get it you will have to enable the x-proposed-updates source and get the package from there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-03 Thread Nikolaos Perrakis
I am still getting this error after running sudo apt update I m running fully upgraded Ubuntu 16.04.1 - here's appstream info apt-cache policy appstream appstream: Installed: 0.9.4-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.9.4-1ubuntu1 Version table: 0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1 100 100

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-03 Thread Bogdan Yurov
This is still an issue for me on Xenial: ** (appstreamcli:1017): DEBUG: WARNING: Skipped component 'gvim.desktop': The component is invalid. ** (appstreamcli:1017): DEBUG: WARNING: Skipped component 'display-im6.q16.desktop': The component is invalid. ** (appstreamcli:1017): DEBUG: WARNING:

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-03 Thread Krino Hoogestraat
Thanks for the fix! Problem appears to have been solved (0.10.1). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-02 Thread Dan Mick
Updated package removed error message for me: # apt-cache policy appstream appstream: Installed: 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 Version table: 0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1 100 100 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports/main amd64 Packages *** 0.9.4-1ubuntu2

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-02 Thread Krino Hoogestraat
If I use sudo apt update && sudo apt full-upgrade the bug recurs: krino@krino-desktop:~$ sudo apt update && sudo apt full-upgrade [sudo] Passwort für krino: OK:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/bitcoin/bitcoin/ubuntu xenial InRelease Holen:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
If one of you uses KDE, it would be useful to check if Plasma Discover still works as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-01 Thread paz
No more errors on Xenial ... sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade [sudo] password for just: Hit:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/noobslab/themes/ubuntu xenial InRelease Hit:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease Hit:3 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-01 Thread Mathew Hodson
** No longer affects: debian ** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #820774 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820774 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title:

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-12-01 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Thomas, or anyone else affected, Accepted appstream into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/0.9.4-1ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-30 Thread 3DRaven
I confirm this bug. Ubuntu 16.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The Debian bug is about the warning message not being actionable when it appears, it does *not* appear at Debian under normal circumstances, hence it is a completely different issue (and one that isn't easily solvable). ** Changed in: appstream (Debian) Importance: Unknown => Undecided **

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #820774 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820774 ** Also affects: appstream (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820774 Importance:

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Iain Lane
Right, wait for a call for testing on this bug - before then you won't get it unless you build the package yourself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@krino: Are you sure that you updated the AppStream package? Because it looks like Laney's upload didn't reach x-u-proposed yet (and therefore also isn't in x-updates yet). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Krino Hoogestraat
Bug still persists after update: 20161128 18:00 GMT. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Iain Lane
Uploaded, thank you! ** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
(The attached patch solves an introspection ABI mismatch that I overlooked initially) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Yes, Yakkety and Zesty are not affected. ** Patch added: "appstream_0.9.4-1ubuntu2_LP1644498_v2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1644498/+attachment/4784052/+files/appstream_0.9.4-1ubuntu2_LP1644498_v2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-28 Thread Daniel Holbach
Is this just an issue in Xenial? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed,

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-27 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "appstream_0.9.4-1ubuntu2_LP1644498_v1.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-27 Thread Nikita Rotsky
Thanks, Matthias, the patch has fixed that bug. I was able to upgrade "appstream" package to 0.10.1 without any probs afterward. Cheers! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title:

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * The recent update of the Ubuntu asgen instance yielded it to generate + modern metadata. While we could tell asgen to generate old-style + metadata, fixing appstream is the better idea, since we already applied + similar patches to appstream-glib (and

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Patch for this bug is attached. I included a change unrelated to this issue in the patch too, to make AppStream more robust against on-disk data corruption (or someone trying to DOS it by intentionally inserting broken data). 03_yaml-parser-errors.patch: Make the YAML parser deal with errors

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-26 Thread vigilian
I don't have any mail monitoring Atteint:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/x2go/stable/ubuntu xenial InRelease Atteint:2 http://be.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease Réception de:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease [102 kB]

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-25 Thread Thomas A. F. Thorne
Installing the fixed file is not really a work around but the error piping would work. I'll live with the noise for now and try to get the updated package installed once it reaches xenial-backports. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
A workaround would be to update to the appstream/libappstream package in xenial-backports or to just sent the output of stderr to /dev/null to get rid of the message. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-25 Thread Thomas A. F. Thorne
> I think I found the issue, I'll prepare a patch. That is great news. Is there a work around I could try that would silence the emails for a while? Let me know if you would like me to try out the updated binary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-24 Thread Jay Anderson
Here's my output if it will help. root@HP-Pavilion:~# appstreamcli refresh --force --verbose ** (appstreamcli:18192): DEBUG: Refreshing AppStream cache ** (appstreamcli:18192): DEBUG: Reading: /usr/share/app-info/xmls/org.freedesktop.fwupd.xml ** (appstreamcli:18192): DEBUG: Reading:

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I think I found the issue, I'll prepare a patch. ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, the complaint appears because of these warnings, and those warnings exist because AS detected a component without a name, summary or ID, which should never happen. We'd need to figure out why those components exist. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-24 Thread Thomas A. F. Thorne
Thank you. I could not figure out which combination of commands to send appsteamcli. I had tried status and validate without success. Here is the requested output: manager@Jenkins:~$ sudo appstreamcli refresh --verbose --force [sudo] password for manager: ** (appstreamcli:32754): DEBUG:

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Can you please run `sudo appstreamcli refresh --verbose --force` and attach the output here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-24 Thread Jay Anderson
Originally posted to bug 1575248. On 23 Nov 2016: Noticed that I was having this issue ~20 Nov 2016. This is the most recent mention that Google found. I will provide details if there is interest. And on 24 Nov 2016: Yesterday was the second time that I had noticed this issue, so I started

[Bug 1644498] Re: apt-get update returns "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." periodically

2016-11-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644498 Title: