[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2017-11-17 Thread Frank Heimes
... after discussing with IBM

** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2017-01-17 Thread bugproxy
** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-10"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804032/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-10

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-11"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804033/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-11

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-12"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804034/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-12

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-13"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804035/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-13

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-14"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804036/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-14

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-15"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804037/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-15

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-02"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805322/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-02

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-04"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805323/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-04

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-05"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805324/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-05

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-06"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805325/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-06

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-07"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805326/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-07

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-08"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805327/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-08

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-15"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805334/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-15

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-14"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805333/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-14

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-13"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805332/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-13

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-12"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805331/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-12

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-11"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805330/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-11

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-10"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805329/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-10

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-09"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4805328/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-09

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2017-01-17 Thread bugproxy
** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-05"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4786475/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-05

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-05"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804027/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-05

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-06"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804028/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-06

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-07"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804029/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-07

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-08"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804030/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-08

** Attachment removed: "sosreport-part-09"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+attachment/4804031/+files/sosreport.LP1644785-part-09

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2017-01-13 Thread Billy Olsen
As I'm looking at the data some more, I see in the sos reports provided
that there may be heavy pressure for the async I/O and that may actually
be what's causing the problems here.

In the syslog, I see the following events getting reported from
multipathd soon after the the device is discovered (its part of the udev
event hooks I believe):

Jan 12 22:02:49 ub01 multipathd[179286]: sdch: add path (uevent)
Jan 12 22:02:49 ub01 multipathd[179286]: io_setup failed
Jan 12 22:02:49 ub01 multipathd[179286]: uevent trigger error

The io_setup is a system call into the kernel which can fail for a few
different reasons, but one of the reasons it will fail is if the number
of async io requests are greater than the current amount. It will error
out with an EAGAIN, but there's explicit documentation in the multipath
that one of the reasons that the io_setup may fail in this case is due
to the settings of the fs.aio-nr-max, which is essentially the maximum
number of events for all currently active aio contexts.

Checking the value collected I see these values:

# Quick check on the box today
fs.aio-max-nr = 65536
fs.aio-nr = 124928

# From the sosreport provided on 12/01
fs.aio-max-nr = 65536
fs.aio-nr = 131072

As you can see the aio-nr is well above the aio-max-nr. I'm not entirely
sure what is causing this, but there are a large number of async io
events queued up.

I think the plan of action should be to:

a) configure multipath to ignore the iscsi devices presented between cinder and 
nova
b) cleanup any errors in the current paths used by multipath, so that we know 
that disk i/o to the actul backend is not an issue
c) Possibly consider increasing the fs.aio-max-nr

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2017-01-13 Thread Billy Olsen
I too noticed the:

Nov 23 03:17:47 ub01 multipathd[179286]: io_setup failed
Nov 23 03:17:47 ub01 multipathd[179286]: uevent trigger error

Errors - and they continue to persist in recent recreate attempts. I
think it would be good to configure multipath such that the devices
provided by Cinder are excluded. Likely the best approach would be a
general blacklist of all devices and provide exclusions for the known
backends that you have for other storage devices.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2017-01-05 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Billy Olsen (billy-olsen)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2017-01-04 Thread Ryan Beisner
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
 Assignee: Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-12-01 Thread Billy Olsen
As Ryan indicated in his previous comment, the reason that the instances
are unable to launch is due to the libvirt error:

libvirtError: internal error: process exited while connecting to
monitor: 2016-11-23T08:18:06.762943Z qemu-system-s390x: -drive
file=/dev/disk/by-path/ip-148.100.42.50:3260-iscsi-
iqn.2010-10.org.openstack:volume-f36c890c-1313-41de-b56d-991a2ece094c-
lun-1,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,serial=f36c890c-1313
-41de-b56d-991a2ece094c,cache=none,aio=native: The device is not
writable: Bad file descriptor

This indicates that the block device mapped by the file path /dev/disk
/by-path ... has a bad file descriptor. Bad file descriptor suggests to
me either that the device came and went away, the device is (for some
reason) visible as read-only, or that the device hasn't yet been fully
attached. This error messages is provided by the qemu code and only
logged when checking to ensure the block-device's file descriptor is
writable.

I think it'd be useful to get a bit more data from the compute and
cinder nodes. Can you collect a bunch of data regarding the system using
a tool called sosreport (in the xenial archives)? It will collect
various logs, metrics, and system configuration which is useful to
perform diagnostics. Just make sure to run the sosreport tool with the
-a command to ensure that all of the information is captured (more
efficient to get it the first go 'round).

Before collecting the sosreport, it probably makes sense to increase the
debug logging for the nova and qemu services prior to collecting the
data. Setting logging levels for both to debug would provide lots of
useful information.

Also note: the 2.2 GB partition isn't an issue AIUI. The volume is created by:
 1. downloading the image from glance
 2. expanding and writing the block-level content to the cinder volume (where 
content is expanded from 320 MB to 2.2 GB). 
 3. When cloud-init runs on startup of the VM, the code detects the underlying 
disk is bigger than what is currently seen and will attempt to expand the 
partition and filesystem to consume the full content of the disk.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-12-01 Thread Frank Heimes
Just as a side note: The background for asking about the quota was because this 
issue may have something to do with crossing some kind of a 1 TB boundary.
Given the fact that storage in partly calculated using different factors (e.g. 
1000 or 1024) and 51 * 20480MB is surprisingly close to 1TB ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-30 Thread Ryan Beisner
I wonder if that is caused by one of the quota/limits in place.  One
thing to check would be Cinder.  It has a default of 1000MB for
maxTotalVolumeGigabytes.

$ cinder absolute-limits
+--+---+
|   Name   | Value |
+--+---+
| maxTotalBackupGigabytes  |  1000 |
| maxTotalBackups  |   10  |
|maxTotalSnapshots |   10  |
| maxTotalVolumeGigabytes  |  1000 |
| maxTotalVolumes  |   10  |
| totalBackupGigabytesUsed |   0   |
| totalBackupsUsed |   0   |
|totalGigabytesUsed|   0   |
|totalSnapshotsUsed|   0   |
| totalVolumesUsed |   0   |
+--+---+

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-30 Thread Ryan Beisner
Thanks for the logs.  Nova conductor is reporting "NoValidHost: No valid
host was found. There are not enough hosts available." when attempting
to schedule and spawn an instance.  That is a somewhat generic failure
message.  But the specific failure seems to be a backing storage issue:

2016-11-23T08:17:48.103748Z qemu-system-s390x: -drive file=/dev/disk/by-
path/ip-148.100.42.50:3260-iscsi-iqn.2010-10.org.openstack:volume-
cfbc521f-4d9f-4ecc-8feb-777d1e5446e1-lun-1,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-
virtio-disk0,serial=cfbc521f-4d9f-4ecc-8feb-
777d1e5446e1,cache=none,aio=native: The device is not writable: Bad file
descriptor

...

2016-11-23 03:17:54.654 6858 WARNING nova.scheduler.utils 
[req-ed481e89-154a-4002-b402-30002ed6a80b 7cce79da15be4daf9189541d1d5650be 
63958815625d4108970e78bacf578e32 - - -] [instance: 
89240ffa-7dcf-444d-8a8f-b751cd8b5e19] Setting instance to ERROR state.
2016-11-23 03:17:58.965 6833 ERROR nova.scheduler.utils 
[req-ed481e89-154a-4002-b402-30002ed6a80b 7cce79da15be4daf9189541d1d5650be 
63958815625d4108970e78bacf578e32 - - -] [instance: 
0cb365ea-550f-4720-a630-93821d50d43b] Error from last host: ub01 (node 
ub01.marist.edu): [u'Traceback (most recent call last):\n', u'  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/compute/manager.py", line 1926, in 
_do_build_and_run_instance\nfilter_properties)\n', u'  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/compute/manager.py", line 2116, in 
_build_and_run_instance\ninstance_uuid=instance.uuid, 
reason=six.text_type(e))\n', u'RescheduledException: Build of instance 
0cb365ea-550f-4720-a630-93821d50d43b was re-scheduled: internal error: process 
exited while connecting to monitor: 2016-11-23T08:17:48.103748Z 
qemu-system-s390x: -drive 
file=/dev/disk/by-path/ip-148.100.42.50:3260-iscsi-iqn.2010-10.org.openstack:volume-cfbc521f-4d9f-4ecc-8feb-777d1e5446e1-lun-1,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk
 0,serial=cfbc521f-4d9f-4ecc-8feb-777d1e5446e1,cache=none,aio=native: The 
device is not writable: Bad file descriptor\n']
2016-11-23 03:17:59.011 6833 WARNING nova.scheduler.utils 
[req-ed481e89-154a-4002-b402-30002ed6a80b 7cce79da15be4daf9189541d1d5650be 
63958815625d4108970e78bacf578e32 - - -] Failed to compute_task_build_instances: 
No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available.
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_messaging/rpc/server.py", line 
150, in inner
return func(*args, **kwargs)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/scheduler/manager.py", line 104, 
in select_destinations
dests = self.driver.select_destinations(ctxt, spec_obj)

  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/scheduler/filter_scheduler.py", 
line 74, in select_destinations
raise exception.NoValidHost(reason=reason)

NoValidHost: No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts
available.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-30 Thread Ryan Beisner
Apologies, I missed the comment which stated that the deployment was
done manually without Juju.  Unfortunately, that will make it very
difficult to try to reproduce, and reinforces the need for logs to
triage.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-30 Thread Ryan Beisner
Before I can do much with this, I need more information.

How were the applications/services deployed? Please provide a Juju
bundle and Juju status output, sanitized.

What are the specs of the machine(s)?

Logs from api and compute services should be indicative.  Are those
available or can those be analyzed, then post relevant errors and
tracebacks?

Thank you.

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

** Changed in: openstack (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-30 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Beisner (1chb1n)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2016-11-30 04:17 EDT---
Raised Priority to "Block" to highlight the urgency!

** Tags removed: severity-high
** Tags added: severity-critical

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-29 Thread Frank Heimes
... and please also the status about the disk utilization before and after you 
hit that situation?
Thx

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-29 Thread Ryan Beisner
Can we please get juju status output from this deployment? That, plus
the bundle used to deploy, will be helpful in understanding which
applications are where, and how they are configured. Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-29 Thread Ryan Beisner
Can we please get juju status output from this deployment?  That, plus
the bundle used to deploy, will be helpful in understanding which
services are where, and how they are configured.  Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-29 Thread Ryan Beisner
** Tags added: s390x uosci

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-29 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags added: openstack-ibm

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644785] Re: Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

2016-11-25 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin16041

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644785

Title:
  Ubuntu Openstack Mitaka can only deploy up to 52 instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openstack/+bug/1644785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs