[Bug 1667480] Re: browser-support needs to be an implicit interface, not implicit classic

2017-06-26 Thread Amr Ibrahim
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667480 Title: browser-support needs to be an implicit interface, not

[Bug 1667480] Re: browser-support needs to be an implicit interface, not implicit classic

2017-02-28 Thread Jamie Strandboge
This is committed to master and will be fixed in snapd 2.23. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667480 Title:

[Bug 1667480] Re: browser-support needs to be an implicit interface, not implicit classic

2017-02-27 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667480 Title: browser-support needs to be an implicit interface, not implicit

[Bug 1667480] Re: browser-support needs to be an implicit interface, not implicit classic

2017-02-23 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Description changed: While running any browser/webapp on the arm64 dragonboard, they would not run under strict confinement. - Per jdstrand we need browser-support + Per jdstrand we need browser-support as an implicit interface, not just + implicit classic. Other denials to udev