[Expired for xrdp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: xrdp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672742
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or
multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest
coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a
debdiff is
When will the patch hit the world? Upstream has fixed and Fedora is
already fixing it. ubuntu sounds a little bit slow in fixing?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672742
Title:
pam
Use CVE-2017-6967.
Thanks
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-6967
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672742
Title:
pam session does not work in xrdp
Upstream pull request #694 fixes the problem:
https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/pull/694
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672742
Title:
pam session does not work in xrdp
To
Am 15.03.2017 um 08:02 schrieb Klaus Steinberger:
> Am 15.03.2017 um 00:44 schrieb Seth Arnold:
>> Hello Klaus, is this a usability issue or does this also allow someone
>> to improperly elevate their privileges?
>
> One more point: Correct setting of umask (which is definitly a security
>
Am 15.03.2017 um 00:44 schrieb Seth Arnold:
> Hello Klaus, is this a usability issue or does this also allow someone
> to improperly elevate their privileges?
One more point: Correct setting of umask (which is definitly a security thing)
is also dependent on a working session management -> see
Hi Seth,
> Hello Klaus, is this a usability issue or does this also allow someone
> to improperly elevate their privileges?
it does allow someone to login to machines which she/he has no right to access.
E.g. machines reserved for a group, or machines with special hardware which
should not be
Hello Klaus, is this a usability issue or does this also allow someone
to improperly elevate their privileges?
Thanks
** Package changed: ubuntu => xrdp (Ubuntu)
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
