[Bug 1679403] Re: Missing dep8 tests
@yadi, thanks for looking at this! When I filed a number of bugs around missing dep8 tests I did my best to catch source packages that did not contain binaries/source-only. I think your proposed test would give an uploader a greater sense of security when uploading a new version of the package. However, given how little the package has been updated in the past and that it does not contain binaries or depend on anything I believe the risk is low. Therefore I am also fine with closing as invalid as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679403 Title: Missing dep8 tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-langpack/+bug/1679403/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1679403] Re: Missing dep8 tests
The basic test that Squid application will start is already done by the squid package DEP-8 tests. Though that could be repeated as a test for this package with the simpler installation of only squid, squidclient and squid-langpack packages. What seems to be missing is a test that the right Content-Language error response is returned by Squid given an Accept-Language input header. A default installation of squid should reject all traffic, so is easy to test for that. Are there any other specific DEP-8 tests preferred for a package which simply installs translation files for another package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679403 Title: Missing dep8 tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-langpack/+bug/1679403/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
