[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: binutils Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager - 1.8.2-1ubuntu8 --- network-manager (1.8.2-1ubuntu8) artful; urgency=medium * debian/network-manager.postinst: drop in an empty override file for NetworkManager to manage all devices for upgrade from any version, as long as there is no netplan configuration yet. (LP: #1676547) -- Brian Murray Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:20:18 -0700 ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.29-13ubuntu1 --- binutils (2.29-13ubuntu1) artful; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian; remaining changes: - Build from upstream sources. binutils (2.29-13) unstable; urgency=medium * Build again all cross packages. binutils (2.29-12) unstable; urgency=medium * Update, taken from the 2.29 branch 20170919. - Fix PR ld/21441, PowerPC64 stubs don't match calculated size. Closes: #876134. - Fix PR ld/22048, Incorrect .eh_frame section in libc.so. - Fix PR ld/22150, ld keeps a version reference for gc'd symbols. Closes: #874585. LP: #1715641. - Fix PR ld/22148, Integer overflow in elf64-x86-64.c. - Fix PR ld/21924, Require GCC 5 or above for 3 x86 tests. * Fix installation of test summaries. * Compare test summaries for cross builds. -- Matthias Klose Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:09:15 +0200 ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: binutils Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: binutils Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #22150 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22150 ** Also affects: binutils via https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22150 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
I think there is at least a bug in network-manager: it defines (for whatever reason) an explicit_bzero function, which is not used when building with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE. The reference in string_erase is transformed from explicit_bzero to explicit_bzero_chk. So if network- manager defines explicit_bzero, then it should define explicit_bzero_chk as well. Note that linking with gold (both 2.28 and 2.29) you end up with an undefined symbol GLIBC_2.25 __explicit_bzero_chk. The bfd linker however seems to optimize that out, and doesn't leave any undefined symbol. However in ld-2.29 it leaves a reference in Version needs section '.gnu.version_r' contains 9 entries: 0x0170: Name: GLIBC_2.25 Flags: none Version: 11 Removing this unused explicit_bzero function seems to work, and the string-util.h is not installed anywhere, it shouldn't be part of any API. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
test files at https://people.canonical.com/~doko/tmp/lp1715641.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #874585 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874585 ** Also affects: dpkg (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874585 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
I believe this is a bug in dpkg, since it does not parse 'Version References:' paragraph of data. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
Inspecting with readelf I see this: Version needs section '.gnu.version_r' contains 9 entries: Addr: 0x00010a80 Offset: 0x010a80 Link: 6 (.dynstr) 00: Version: 1 File: ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Cnt: 1 0x0010: Name: GLIBC_2.3 Flags: none Version: 20 0x0020: Version: 1 File: libuuid.so.1 Cnt: 1 0x0030: Name: UUID_1.0 Flags: none Version: 18 0x0040: Version: 1 File: libdl.so.2 Cnt: 1 0x0050: Name: GLIBC_2.2.5 Flags: none Version: 13 0x0060: Version: 1 File: libudev.so.1 Cnt: 1 0x0070: Name: LIBUDEV_183 Flags: none Version: 8 0x0080: Version: 1 File: libsystemd.so.0 Cnt: 1 0x0090: Name: LIBSYSTEMD_209 Flags: none Version: 7 0x00a0: Version: 1 File: libcurl-gnutls.so.4 Cnt: 1 0x00b0: Name: CURL_GNUTLS_3 Flags: none Version: 6 0x00c0: Version: 1 File: libgnutls.so.30 Cnt: 1 0x00d0: Name: GNUTLS_3_4 Flags: none Version: 5 0x00e0: Version: 1 File: libpthread.so.0 Cnt: 1 0x00f0: Name: GLIBC_2.2.5 Flags: none Version: 3 0x0100: Version: 1 File: libc.so.6 Cnt: 11 0x0110: Name: GLIBC_2.9 Flags: none Version: 19 0x0120: Name: GLIBC_2.17 Flags: none Version: 17 0x0130: Name: GLIBC_2.14 Flags: none Version: 16 0x0140: Name: GLIBC_2.8 Flags: none Version: 15 0x0150: Name: GLIBC_2.3.4 Flags: none Version: 14 0x0160: Name: GLIBC_2.3.2 Flags: none Version: 12 0x0170: Name: GLIBC_2.25 Flags: none Version: 11 0x0180: Name: GLIBC_2.7 Flags: none Version: 10 0x0190: Name: GLIBC_2.3 Flags: none Version: 9 0x01a0: Name: GLIBC_2.2.5 Flags: none Version: 4 0x01b0: Name: GLIBC_2.4 Flags: none Version: 2 Maybe shlibdeps doesn't process .gnu.version_r sections? ** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc
maybe Dpkg/Shlibs/Objdump.pm doesn't parse that section? Or maybe objdump output changed, hence the parsing fails? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1715641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs