Yay... looks like this has reared its ugly head again:
Platform: amd64 Ubuntu 8.04 Beta as of April 8 2008.
Filename:
pool/multiverse/f/flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.115.0ubuntu5_amd64.deb
md5sum mismatch
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
Setting back to confirmed in Gutsy and Hardy, md5sums mismatch happens
again because of new 9.0.124.0 release.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
If it helps any, the Adobe Flash Player version 9.0.124.0 .tar.gz for
Linux (x86) from
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash
has the following properties:
name: install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
size: 3044538 bytes
md5sum:
I'm acking a Gutsy SRU from bug #214341
(http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13270881/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.124
.0ubuntu1_gutsy-proposed_rev2.debdiff)
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum
I updated the md5sums in debian/config and debian/postinst, which seems
to fix it. In addition to the md5sum on the tarball, the md5sum for
libflashplayer.so is 1f26a6eeb8c06acf0af9433da2312d54.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
Fixed in Hardy.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Is this bug fixed ? The status message is that the fix is released. But
on installing the new version I still get the same error. I am I missing
something or the bug is still not fixed if so please change the status
message.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
Do you exactly have this error? :
md5sum mismatch install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
The Flash plugin is NOT installed.
Note that this bug is not fixed in dapper and edgy. And I just installed
flashplugin-nonfree in Hardy and had no problem.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new
viyyer: the situation is somewhat complex. Please read the notes in the
bug description. If none of the hints there solve the problem for you
then please supply the information which is being requested up there
(where up refers to the top of the Launchpad web page where this bug
lives; you could
** Tags added: metabug
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Mr. Alderman, the first bug is Bug 175255. As regards to the second, I
am not sure what you are referring to, as I don't believe the browsers
hang (at least for Firefox), unless you are referring to Konqueror/Opera
(I don't know the situation with these browsers).
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to
Conrad Knauer : This bug report is about flashplugin-nonfree that has
problems installing flash because flashplugin-nonfree has no way to
download the good flash version once it has been updated by Adobe. Since
we can't fix this by ourselves (Flash cannot be distributed), the
logical way to fix
Saïvann Carignan: Why not request that Adobe simply set up a DEB
repository? (They have a YUM (RPM-based) repository; see
http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2007/06/new_installation_method.html)
or why not get Canonical to get Adobe's Flash into the partner repos?
And regarding we will
To all ubuntu users who want this problem to be fixed with future adobe
flash update :
I contacted Adobe and I asked them to add permanent links to all flash
linux version so we don't get md5sums errors and weeks of waiting when
flash updates introduces additional problems. Adobe answered and
Saïvan, please re-read everything in this bug report, because you don't
seem to understand what is the problem. (Like Oliver says, you are
asking for people to be able to install software with a security flaw
and exploits publicly available, and I'm sure that's not what you really
want.)
--
Not sure if this is the right place for this comment, but in my opinion
the real problem in this case was that Adobe mixed security fixes and
major changes (which made Flash no longer working with existing
software like Konqueror) into a single release.
This is something that can probably only be
well i would love to use gnash...he only problem is that here it wont
work right...some flash aplications dont get right...they seen bugged,
including youtube, it plays but the panel gets all messed up =(
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
The content available from Adobe is going to change. Either Ubuntu has
to be timely in getting updated packages with an updated MD5SUM, to
detect file corruption from the transfer, whenever Adobe updates the
download, or change the approach. Some options that come to mind: (a)
skip the
But normal people should have something to bear, a message that notifies them
of this problem, i.e.
The package does not match our checked version and the installation is broken,
please wait for an upgrade.
*OR*
Ask the user if they would like to download it: The package seems updated or
Jan Claeys Oliver Gerlich : I totally agree about your opinion
concerning the security, however, like Oliver Gerlich said in this case,
we had problems since the new flash version could not be installed due
to problems with konqueror so the security updates took multiples weeks
before being
The problem is the nature of the link between the package and the real
code that it downloads from Adobe.
Adobe maintains the URL to point to the current code, which is what we
want (as noted, they *could* maintain links to security fixed older
versions, but it is likely that they will maintain
well i would love to use gnash...the only problem is that here it wont
work right...some flash aplications dont get right...they seen bugged,
including youtube, it plays but the panel gets all messed up =(
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 17:42 +, Jim wrote:
The md5sum on our end is pretty important, actually: we *want* to know
when the content changes, and then not work until it's QA'd to not cause
major problems.
That's fine for development releases, but once the stable release has
been made,
That's fine for development releases, but once the stable release has
been made, you've got your users to think about. This should _not_ be a
fatal error. Toss a popup if you must, but leaving the user high and dry
with respect to flash _every time Macromedia makes a new release_ is
really
Leaving your users high and dry for a day before the updated
.deb can be put out is better than not getting a chance to
test what you release.
Nit: it really isn't what Ubuntu releases. It is what Adobe releases.
AIUI, Ubuntu is just a distribution vector, and trying to make sure that
what
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 21:22 +, Jim
But that should be an indication of why testing is necessary: a failed
installation and a message of why it failed is infinitely better than a
successful installation that breaks browsers.
And better than both would be a warning of some kind that
And better than both would be a warning of some kind that informs of the
situation, but still allows the user to override the developer's
decision to prevent the installation of software he wants.
Unstable releases are a feature of every distribution I've heard of,
including Ubuntu.
Well I think that arguing can be great but I suggest to stop arguing and
start acting. That's why I suggested people to ask Adobe for permanent
links because it was a concrete action against one aspect of that bug.
Some people answer to this that it's not the first priority in their
opinion, but
I suggested people to ask Adobe for permanent links
The problem is that the link should be to the latest good code, not the
code with known security defects. And Ubuntu seems to be saying that
they require a local checksum to forcibly break the install whenever
Adobe changes the package. So a
On 02/23/2008 06:43 PM, Savvas Radević wrote:
So let's sum up, the devs have to deal with the limited adobe flash
installation:
Ease of use and circumference with a yes/no to attempt the installation even
when there's an md5 mismatch (unsecure)
vs.
Some kind of visual warning until the
So let's sum up, the devs have to deal with the limited adobe flash
installation:
Ease of use and circumference with a yes/no to attempt the installation even
when there's an md5 mismatch (unsecure)
vs.
Some kind of visual warning until the package is properly tested (secure)
I would suggest
After upgrading from feisty last night, I'm having this problem now.
Perhaps adobe has released a new version.
I think there are two bugs here that aren't being clearly addressed:
1) when the package gets installed and fails, the package management
infrastructure should detect that condition and
Installing directly from Adobe is not an acceptable option. It is not
good for package management, and more importantly, does not let 64-bit
users use the flashplugin. The package should be in Ubuntu, not
Medibuntu, since this package (although non-free) is essential for many
Ubuntu humans.
Maritn - What is the intent of the Dapper and Edgy tasks in this bug?
flashplugin-nonfree is at 7.0 for both Dapper and Edgy at the moment bug
9.0 exists in the -backports repositories for both of them. If this is
something that becomes fixed via -backports would the Dapper and Edgy
tasks
Maritn - What is the intent of the Dapper and Edgy tasks in this bug?
flashplugin-nonfree is at 7.0 for both Dapper and Edgy at the moment bug
9.0 exists in the -backports repositories for both of them. If this is
something that becomes fixed via -backports would the Dapper and Edgy
tasks the
In the process of doing SRU verification for bug 184149 I updated the
backport of flashplugin-nonfree for dapper. The package is currently in
the hold queue for dapper-backports and I've attached a debdiff.
** Attachment added: new md5sums for flashplugin-nonfree on dapper
Anyone else here who's more proficient in .deb files want to offer one
that contains the old version? I think that's a good solution for
people who run into this. Not as good as Konqueror fixing itself, but
easier and more immediate until moving to Hardy (where Konqueror is fixed).
This is
Hey,
I just installed this update, and it has broken my flash in Konqueror
3.5.8 and Opera 9.25.
I tried purging it and then installing again as recommended at the top
of this thread but that does no good.
I am constantly getting crashes in nspluginviewer in Konqueror, and
flash applets don't
This is a known issue. The new version of Flash is only compatible with
9.50 Beta 2 of Opera (and later). The new version of Flash is
incompatible with Konqueror because it requires XEmbed (Bug 174343).
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
!
Why on earth has been this released on Kubuntu Gutsy then? Is it a
backport? Is there any way I can get back the nice old version that
worked!?
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a
!
Why on earth has been this released on Kubuntu Gutsy then? Is it a
backport? Is there any way I can get back the nice old version that
worked!?
It was released to Gutsy because everyone who doesn't use Konqueror was
broken before, and every new Gutsy user was unable to use Flash. Not
Several people in #ubuntu-de confirmed that 9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12.2
fixed their issues.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
i received the new flash pugin on the update manager and now it is
working fine (finally). Its funny how something so simple has taked that
time to be fixed.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because
My flashplugin-nonfree is b0rked on gutsy/amd64 by latest update (today
2008-02-07), exactly as
reported by Diego Gaustein (immediately above).
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a
Sorry for the spam: after purging the package and reinstalling it, it
works as intended.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
I just got the new package from gutsy-updates to install with update
manager, it seems to have failed:
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 136118 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12 (using
The md5sums in the debian/config files were not updated, people with the
previous flash tar still in their local disk will have flash suddenly
removed.
Attaching a fix, tested with a user in that situation
17:38 bazhang 821cc72359a937caef85bb4cc74ef5cd
(I couldn't understand Mekaniserad Apelsin's post so some of my post may
just be repeating what he said.)
I received this update automatically via update manager. Because the
previous tar.gz was still in /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree, the package
did not attempt to download the new version, and
Mekaniserad Apelsin wrote:
This aint ok. You can't have a postinst-script that first checks if you
have a file and don't check if it is the right file before deciding if
to dl the right file.
It screws up upgrading (as you already know) and if/when this deb ever
hits non proposed repos it
Oh well, freedom has its cost sometimes I guess...
Wouldn't it be easier if they packed the binary along with the package?
I suppose adobe forbids redistribution too huh? Can't wait for gnash to gloom :)
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
My flashplugin-nonfree is b0rked on gutsy/amd64 by latest update (today
2008-02-07), exactly as
reported by Diego Gaustein (immediately above).
The fix for this is as follows:
$ sudo rm -f
/var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
I imagine this is being worked on
feisty
** Attachment added: flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.2.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11815480/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1%7E7.04.2.debdiff
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug
gutsy 12.1 - 12.2 upgrade via Update Manager went smoothly for me.
Flash was working and still does, looks like it used the installer that
was downloaded when I installed 12.1.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug
Please try 9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12.2 (gutsy) and
9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.3 (feisty).
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
Agreed, not making this idiot-proof goes against bug #1. Let's see a
seamless fix.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Savvas,
This fix is currently in gutsy-updates. At that point, it should be
able to be upgraded simply by hitting the install button in the Update
Manager. There are a ton of people who in the past day or two will have
gotten their flash broken by just blindly installing every update that
comes
This aint ok. You can't have a postinst-script that first checks if you
have a file and don't check if it is the right file before deciding if
to dl the right file.
It screws up upgrading (as you already know) and if/when this deb ever
hits non proposed repos it will freak out tons of users that
People are reporting this bug again (like mine:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189819 ), and they are being marked as
duplicates of this bug. That is just wrong. This bug is marked as Fix
Released when the new bug is a fresh situation of the same bug without
a fix released.
There is no way the
Daeng, the fix is released in gutsy-proposed and feisty-proposed, as the bug
report ON TOP suggests.
The situation is resolved, I think that some people need to test it before it
is released under normal updates.
Please don't comment unless it's really necessary, don't stress the emails as
Can someone please give this a go on dapper, too? Few, if any people
will care about Edgy nowadays, but Dapper is a bit more important.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Copied to feisty-updates and gutsy-updates. Thanks to everyone.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to
** Tags added: verification-needed
** Tags removed: verification-done
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: I did that, no dice.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11796568/Screenshot-Software%20Sources.png
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Installing http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10804892/flashplugin-
nonfree_9.0.115.0ubuntu2_amd64.deb worked for me, but the package I got
from gutsy-proposed didn't work, so I guess something is still
broken...?
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
To be clear: Flash worked before I installed the version I got from
gutsy-proposed (as installed before the update by Adobe).
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The 9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12.1 package from gutsy-updates isn't
working for me either. Still a md5sum mismatch.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Flash worked for me when I had the 9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12 package
installed. I upgraded to ...12.1 when the upgrade notifier told me to, and
flash stopped working. I believe the 12.1 version didn't download a new
version of flash (maybe the original adobe tarball was still in a cache
Thanks Ryan, that worked for me. So something with the update from 12 to
12.1 is causing it to fail.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
Has anyone of you read the important notice above? :)
For all of you that complain, which repositories do you use?
Check if your repositories are up to date:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors
Otherwise, try switching to Download from - Main server (at system -
administration -
This bug is still outstanding on a 32 bit gutsy clean install.
I've done nothing on this machine but install gutsy, then the updates, then
attempted to install the flashplugin via the firefox 'install plugins' bar. It
reported that it was installed, but it didn't.
Checking this bug report made
furicle, try this:
System - administration - software sources - be sure than you have selected
the main, universe, restricted and multiverse.
Then go to the Updates tab - check security, updates and proposed
after that, do this in the terminal:
sudo apt-get remove --purge flashplugin-nonfree
Still not working, md5sum mismatch.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Greg Taylor : You have to upgrade flashplugin-nonfree from gutsy-
proposed ( it must be checked in synaptic software sources under the
updates tab ). I just checked and if you get a md5sum missmatch, it's
because you installed the gutsy one and not the gutsy-proposed one.
--
flashplugin-nonfree
Working for me on Feisty 32 bit for both Konqueror and Firefox,
flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.2
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Did you completely uninstall flashplugin-nonfree and remove the copy in
/var/cache/apt and /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree?
Thank you. It now works.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a
I can confirm it worked fine for me on a clean Gutsy install.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Can anyone please test this on Feisty?
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Doesn't work for me on Gutsy 32 bit.
Install plugin bar reappears. Clicking on Install Missing Plugins then
choosing Adobe Flash Player (installer) says me that it is already
installed and restart of Firefox is required. After restarting Firefox
and visiting a site including Flash, install plugin
On Feb 2, 2008 7:26 AM, ckaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reinstalling flashplugin-nonfree through Synaptic doesn't have any
effect on the problem.
Did you completely uninstall flashplugin-nonfree and remove the copy in
/var/cache/apt and /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree?
If so, could you please
Hi,
I tested it on my amd64 distribution. It works well with konqueror and
firefox so far.
Thanks for that fix!
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Fixed in Hardy already.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
Accepted into gutsy-proposed. Please test and give feedback here.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because
Accepted to feisty-proposed, too.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification
Gutsy version seems to work great here.
16:29:53 (314.68 KB/s) - `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' saved
[3036127/3036127]
Download done.
Flash Plugin installed.
Flash works just as it always did. Thanks!
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
It's working for me.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
@ Martin Pitt
Accepted into gutsy-proposed. Please test and give feedback here.
Failed for me on Gutsy 64 bits
(Leyendo la base de datos ...
162123 ficheros y directorios instalados actualmente.)
Preparando para reemplazar flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.2+really0ubuntu12.1
(usando
It still does not work in Konqueror.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Rashad, all: It is known that this version does not work with the
current Konqueror, this is why we held back that update for so long in
the first place. Bug #184149 is the stable release update to make KDE
get along with that new flash version. Please test these versions as
well. Thank you!
--
AlejandroRiveira wrote:
@ Martin Pitt
Accepted into gutsy-proposed. Please test and give feedback here.
Failed for me on Gutsy 64 bits
(Leyendo la base de datos ...
162123 ficheros y directorios instalados actualmente.)
Preparando para reemplazar flashplugin-nonfree
El Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:07:05 -
Saïvann Carignan [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Working for Gutsy
AlejandroRiveira : You have to upgrade flashplugin-nonfree, konqueror,
konqueror-nsplugins and kdelibs from gutsy-proposed ( it must be checked
in synaptic software sources ). You installed the
El Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:07:05 -
Saïvann Carignan [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Working for Gutsy
AlejandroRiveira : You have to upgrade flashplugin-nonfree, konqueror,
konqueror-nsplugins and kdelibs from gutsy-proposed ( it must be checked
in synaptic software sources ). You installed the
Working for Gutsy
AlejandroRiveira : You have to upgrade flashplugin-nonfree, konqueror,
konqueror-nsplugins and kdelibs from gutsy-proposed ( it must be checked
in synaptic software sources ). You installed the old flash version.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
Works perfectly on Gutsy 32 bit.
Should note that immediately after installation, the install plugin bar
reappears (but flash does work). This could be a result of my method of
removing the plugin I had already installed - I removed it through synaptic,
then deleted the .so file from
On Jan 31, 2008 2:33 AM, Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
update this package, too (and blatantly ignore that opera won't work
with the new flash version either).
That's Ok, Opera should be working on a fix anyways, no?
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
Hello all, I'm a long time linux user but recently installed Ubuntu. I
tried to watch YouTube videos and I eventually found this page. Can
anyone point me towards current instructions on how I can get YouTube
working? I read a lot above and fiddled with things, I but don't really
understand the
** Attachment added: patch for gutsy
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11677138/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.2%2Breally0ubuntu12.1.debdiff
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Attachment added: patch for feisty
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11677171/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1%7E7.04.2.debdiff
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Despite the length of this thread I don't actually see any patches.
Attached for gutsy and feisty above, I'll upload to -proposed, edgy and
dapper are harder though, they need updated from flash 7 and there's
more debconf bits to worry about, I couldn't get it working when I tried
briefly, patches
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
