[Bug 1830243] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-08-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2019-08-14 03:38 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status -> closed, Fix Released with Eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830243 Title: [19.

[Bug 1830243] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-07-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2019-07-05 06:10 EDT--- Yes, you do need a signed key. For the purpose of QEMU testing maybe you can use the sign_file tool from the kernel to have a signed kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 1830243] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-07-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2019-07-04 10:32 EDT--- You can actually try to test that yourself by having a guest that has a very new zipl (this commit or newer) https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/s390-tools/commit/6ea645b3453264a0f1a60955c4476dab54035f88 (s390-tools 2.9 will be goo

[Bug 1830243] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-07-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mihaj...@de.ibm.com 2019-07-04 08:02 EDT--- While I'd expect that the combination of a newer guest under an older hypervisor will not be that common, it would probably not hurt to SRU this. If you do, don't forget the OpenStack QEMUs. -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 1830243] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-07-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2019-07-04 05:29 EDT--- The commits identified by Dmitry are mostly for IPLing from a dasd attached via vfio-ccw. I cannot say right now if we want that feature also for disco,cosmic and bionic. If not we can simply focus on just the secure boot toler