[Bug 1838743] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-02-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-11 03:38 EDT--- @Xnox, how do we want to proceed here. Your opinion. Many thx. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838743 Titl

[Bug 1838743] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-12 09:39 EDT--- Some update info: Here is the PR: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/631 No reaction from the maintainer though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1838743] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-09-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2019-09-25 02:58 EDT--- >From the link Christian posted internally: >https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/395 it can be seen that the S/390 LuaJIT port from Mike Munday has been added to the fork from siddesh: https://github.com/siddhesh/LuaJI

[Bug 1838743] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-09-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2019-09-25 02:42 EDT--- (In reply to comment #4) Do you know which of the listed packages are performance critical and might be relevant for mainframe workloads? Stefan SF. had a brief look into LuaJIT and he couldn't find any important user: -