[Bug 1867537] Re: 10-link-restrictions.conf missing - removed by postinst

2021-09-14 Thread Peter White
Oh, I just found the file. It has a different name than suggested in the changelog: /usr/lib/sysctl.d/protect-links.conf And silly me didn't of just checking what sysctl returns for those values set in there. It's all good: $ sudo sysctl fs.protected_fifos fs.protected_fifos = 1 $ sudo sysctl fs

[Bug 1867537] Re: 10-link-restrictions.conf missing - removed by postinst

2021-09-14 Thread Peter White
Just found this, because I also noticed the debsums error. A quick look in the changelog finds this: > procps (2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1) focal; urgency=low > [...] > * Dropped changes, no longer needed: > ... > - 10-link-restrictions.conf: this is redundant with link-protect.conf > from D

[Bug 1867537] Re: 10-link-restrictions.conf missing - removed by postinst

2020-05-05 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867537 Title: 10-link-restrictions.conf missing - removed by postinst To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.

[Bug 1867537] Re: 10-link-restrictions.conf missing - removed by postinst

2020-05-02 Thread fprietog
Problem persist in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS stable release: root@fpglinux:/var/cache# lsb_release -d Description:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS root@fpglinux:/var/cache# apt policy procps procps: Instalados: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2 Candidato: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2 Tabla de versiĆ³n: *** 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2 500

[Bug 1867537] Re: 10-link-restrictions.conf missing - removed by postinst

2020-05-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867537 Title: 10-