[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
> With your ACK I'm then going to accept my own upload yep fine with me, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996 Title: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996 Title: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
If possible I'd prefer to avoid an extra bpo diff just for this, so I'd rather accept it as it is. (Also, ragel is fine to skip because it doesn't change anything in practice, it only used to rebuild something that is otherwise pre- compiled in the tarball; whereas disabling gspell would effectively change the feature set, something that I'd dislike to see done across architectures). With your ACK I'm then going to accept my own upload, thank you for the through review! ** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996 Title: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
It looks like the build does have checks to set WITH_GSPELL off if the lib isn't available so the d/control could maybe just have [!i386] added to the libgtkspell3-3-dev depends? It looks like it already has that restriction for the ragel dep. Or, the Architecture could be changed to avoid i386; or as you said we can just ignore the i386 build failures. Any option is fine with me, as I agree it seems really unlikely anyone will want to use inkscape on a 32-bit system. Feel free to reupload with arch adjustment, or also feel free to accept the current upload (or let me know and I can accept it). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996 Title: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
meh, I didn't notice that, thank you. Looking at the germinate-output file, it looks like gtkspell3 is included in the seed starting with groovy only because of it being a build-dep of inkscape (it's a new build-dep starting with inkscape 1.x, focal has 0.92.x). This also means that a no-change rebuild wouldn't help, it would first need a manual addition to the i386.focal seed, which would be a pain to do. Plus gtkspell3's version is the same from focal all the way to jammy, so I'd need to SRU them all... Honestly, in this case I would propose to just ignore that matter, and just say that inkscape/focal-backport will not be available in i386. Personally, I actually find no reason for inkscape to be in the i386 seed (it's there only as a build-dep of a i386-only package), and I'm actually working (more or less, it's a plan) to drop it from there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996 Title: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
It looks like the i386 arch fails to build due to missing dep on 'libgtkspell3-3-dev': https://launchpad.net/~ddstreet/+archive/ubuntu/backport/+build/23139572 I'm not sure why i386 is missing in focal for that package; it seems like it's available both before and after focal, but the specific version in focal doesn't have it: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtkspell3/3.0.10-1 can you look into that before we approve the backport? Possibly there should be a no-change rebuild of gtkspell3 in focal to pick up that i386 build? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996 Title: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
