[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-05-19 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** No longer affects: sysstat (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921747 Title: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat. To manage notifications

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Thorsten, OK, thanks. And yes, 20.04 (Focal) already incorporates the fix so it's good to go. That said, since it's not reproducible or can't be triggered, I am marking this as Invalid for Xenial and Bionic. Should you feel otherwise, please let me know and we can discuss this further.

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-09 Thread Thorsten Schöning
I don't know how to trigger and therefore test this and sadly don't have the time to play around with this as well. So no, I can't guarantee anything. If that fix is contained in UB 20.04 already and it's too risky for you to backport to UB 18.04, I'll simply continue ignoring the problem, as I

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Thorsten, > @Utkarsh - could you have a discussion with Robie wearing his SRU hat > if he'd accept or reject this upload? I had a word with Robie and the SRU team would be willing to ack this upload if you can confirm that you can still reproduce/hit this problem and that once fixed, you'll

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thanks Thomas! HWE kernel is supported and absolutely fine, but also only has NO_HZ_IDLE=y and not FULL. Thanks for the sar conf and the cron messages, but none of them would change/trigger the behavior. I still wonder how this was triggered on your system in regard to verify the fix. But

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-08 Thread Thorsten Schöning
> @Thorsten - is there a reasonable way to trigger the issue[...] I really don't know how to manually trigger that issue beyond what is described in the commit message already. I only recognized the problem and reported it after ignoring it in the past. > A field (which should be displayed as

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-08 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Triaged => Incomplete ** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Utkarsh as preparing a fix and asked me about reproducing it. But it seems usual use cases like this won't show the problem: # Track sudo /usr/lib/sysstat/sa1 -C checknotick 2 /tmp/samine # print sar -u ALL -P ALL -f /tmp/samine It might be that this is due to Ubuntu not having a fully tickless

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~utkarsh/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+git/sysstat/+merge/400772 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921747 Title: Backport missing

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-02 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921747 Title: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-04-01 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Medium => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921747 Title: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat. To

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-03-31 Thread Bryce Harrington
Confirmed the changes are already present in focal, groovy, and hirsute. It looks like the issue also exists in xenial, however the codebase is slightly different there so the patch may not apply directly but looks like it needs essentially the same fix. ** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-03-31 Thread Bryce Harrington
Patch suggested above, as potential fix ** Also affects: sysstat (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "sar-add-missing-gnice-cpu-value.patch"

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-03-30 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Thorsten, This seems to be a valid bug and indeed makes sense. Since this is acknowledged upstream and there exists a simple patch, I am adding "bitesize" and "server-next" tags and marking it as "medium" priority. Furthermore, this only needs a backport to Bionic. All the releases after that

[Bug 1921747] Re: Backport missing %gnice CPU value for tickless CPU in sysstat.

2021-03-30 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Tags added: bite ** Tags removed: bite ** Tags added: bitesize server-next ** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which