This bug was fixed in the package krb5 - 1.19.2-0ubuntu1
---
krb5 (1.19.2-0ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium
[ Sam Hartman ]
* New Upstream version
* Depend on tex-gyre, Closes: #997407
[Simon Chopin]
* d/p/0012-Fix-softpkcs11-build-issues-with-openssl-3.0.patch:
ACK on the package. Looks good, uploaded. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945795
Title:
krb5: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Oh! Right, I didn't notice it was just an extra changelog entry for the
ppa.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945795
Title:
krb5: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
To manage
When I upload to my test PPA I always add a new entry "PPA upload" to
make sure that the whole entry is scrapped, including the ~ppa version
suffix. The actual entry is the one before that.
My usual sponsored uploads are based on debdiffs rather than direct PPA
versions so this has never be an
Hi, thanks for preparing the package, but to be sponsored the
debian/changelog needs a better description than "PPA upload". Could you
please update it with an appropriate changelog including the patch name,
what the patch does, and a LP tag to this bug?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug
I've uploaded a package to
https://launchpad.net/~schopin/+archive/ubuntu/test-ppa/+packages
based on the above MR. autopkgtests against -proposed ran fine on amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
For the record : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/krb5/-/merge_requests/6
I plan on uploading (well, having someone upload) a version of krb5
based off this branch if it hasn't already hit Debian when we start the
transition.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The attachment "0001-Fix-softpkcs11-build-issues-with-openssl-3.0.patch"
seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from
the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the
~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed
