[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2022-04-15 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
A quick update, I might get a chance to dig into this again. I recently noted that the issue persists in 22.04, via the beta installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945874 Title:

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-11-18 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
I haven't had a chance to dig deeper, but I just noticed this same issue in Focal Fossa. If I get a chance to debug this I'll submit a patch here. I might get a chance over the next week, during Thanksgiving break. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-08 Thread Didier Roche
Actually, I got caught by "imported_pools_ vs "all_pools". So yeah, this is expected (this list is to cleanup, removing any temporary imported pool by the script to list all systems available on grub). The issues is below, (I don’t have time to debug it fully right now), but in this part of set

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-07 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
Didier, That part didn't strike me as exceptional because the pool's already mounted, since we're running update-grub from the running system. It's not available to be listed or imported again. I'll want to read 10_linux_zfs in depth to see what it's doing, but if it's depending on a list to

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-07 Thread Didier Roche
Thanks for getting back. Indeed, as I told you, manual mount on /boot is supported (and backed by a large testsuite). I’m puzzled with your failing case: as you can see, we couldn’t import any pools in the script: + zpool import -f -a -o cachefile=none -o readonly=on -N + err=no pools available

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-04 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
A quick test shows the issue not cropping up if I use an install with inherited mountpoints in a more standard hierarchy. I haven't checked out what's different. tank/var/log /var/log zfs defaults 0 0 tank/tmp /tmp zfs defaults 0 0 /dev/md0 /boot ext4 defaults 0 1 /dev/mapper/swap none swap sw 0

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-04 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
Sure. This is a mode I've been using lately where I'm using legacy mountpoints on datasets out of fstab. I suspect this would do the same thing with a traditional inherited mount hierarchy. # cat /etc/fstab tank/zroot / zfs defaults 0 0 tank/home /home zfs defaults 0 0 tank/usr/src /usr/src

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-04 Thread Didier Roche
Thanks for reporting this bug and help making ubuntu better. 10_linux_zfs is supposed to be able to track ext4 /boot and handling it correctly (via looking at fstab and others). What would be interesting is to print your fstab, if we miss anything by any chance. Also, can you set -x on top of

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
** Package changed: grub (Ubuntu) => grub2 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945874 Title: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1945874] Re: 21.10 beta, errors in 10-linux and 10_linux_zfs

2021-10-02 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
** Description changed: - In a custom install of Ubuntu 21.10 beta, both hardware and VM installs suffer from a bug in the grub.d/10_linux and 10_linux_zfs scripts. (For comparison, Debian Bullseye, running a similar version of grub, doesn't have this issue.) Unique to Ubuntu,