Excellent, thanks @waveform! MIR team ack. Promoting it right away as
pillow is trying to pull it already.
** Changed in: raqm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
raqm 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy: universe/misc -> main
libraqm-dev 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% ->
main
libraqm-dev 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% ->
main
libraqm-dev 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% ->
@didrocks LP: #1956769 has now been kindly sponsored by slyon; hopefully
this should be good to go!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951069
Title:
[MIR] raqm
To manage notifications
ack, keep me posted once the autopkgtests are uploaded and I’m happy to
ack the MIR :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951069
Title:
[MIR] raqm
To manage notifications about this
No problem on the delay :)
Looking at the 0.7.2 version I'm happy to ignore it for now. There are
only two changes: one bug fix for spacing in emojis (minor) and the
other fixes an ftbfs for libharfbuzz versions that aren't yet packaged
in Debian/Ubuntu (in other words, there's no harm waiting
Sorry for the delayed response, but EOY holidays and such :)
Ack on the new versions. If you can see if we should backport some of
the fixes in 0.7.2, I will let that to you…
On the autopkgtests, the question is how to protect raqm from it’s
dependencies. If a dependency is changing, then only
** Changed in: raqm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951069
Title:
[MIR] raqm
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thanks for the swift review!
- check if the autopkgtests can be enhanced
I could add an autopkgtest to re-run the full test suite, but given the
full test suite is already executed during the build itself, I'm not
sure how much extra safety that buys us?
- check why 0.7.1 and 0.7.2 ara
xReview for Package: raqm
[Summary]
MIR team ACK, under the constraint that the autopktests possible enhancements
are a little bit more explored (see below) and that check (I didn’t see any
rationale in the request) on why raqm hasn’t been updated despite having new
releases for a year now.
** Changed in: raqm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951069
Title:
[MIR] raqm
To manage notifications about this bug
** Description changed:
- TBD
+ [Availability]
+ The package is already in universe.
+
+ [Rationale]
+ The package is a new dependency of pillow, which is already in main.
+
+ [Security]
+ There are currently no CVEs mentioning raqm, and the project is actively
maintained upstream.
+
+
** Changed in: raqm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951069
Title:
[MIR] raqm
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
12 matches
Mail list logo
