I think given that verification is going to be slightly fiddly and the
update is already badly overdue, I will not attempt to fix this bug in
the next focal update. But also I do not want to leave it so long again
until the next update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
It's definitely non-deterministic, unfortunately. I do have a reliable
reproduction for Bionic and Focal I can trigger on my laptop, but it's a
huge pile of proprietary Ruby code that just happens to hit all the
right timings on my machine. I can validate a -proposed package if you
need though.
Th
So for SRU we ideally want a nice, self-contained, ubuntu-based test
case. Is that possible here? It reads to me as if it's a bit non-
deterministic, is that true?
@kjtsanaktsidis, do you think you can write up reproduction
instructions? If not, would you be able to test the proposed glibc in
your
** Tags added: fr-2102
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags removed: rls-ff-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Just wondering if there's a plan or desire to (correct me if I use the
wrong terminology here..) SRU this into bionic/focal?
The criteria for SRU, from what I read, seem to be related to "critical
bugs" (of which maybe this is not), "regressions" (which this isn't),
and "hardware enablement" (whic
Launchpad has imported 6 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26600.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://h
** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #26600
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26600
** Also affects: glibc via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26600
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: glibc (Ubunt
The attachment "upstream patch with conflicts resolved for 2.27" seems
to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the
~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launc
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961697
Title:
Tran
** Attachment added: "glibc backtrace from hang"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1961697/+attachment/5562613/+files/glibc_backtrace.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Attachment added: "Packet capture showing DNS queries with same txnid"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1961697/+attachment/5562612/+files/dns_same_txid.pcap
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
11 matches
Mail list logo
