This bug was fixed in the package adsys - 0.8.1
---
adsys (0.8.1) jammy; urgency=medium
* Change chown logic on script directory and parents to avoid potential
vulnerability. (LP: #1961458)
* Separate readiness from session running to avoid unrefreshed user script
The flaky test on armhf is fixed by https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/292
(couldn’t retrigger the flakyness after multiple builds in ppa with this patch)
The ppcel64 issue, introduced by new samba is workarounded in
https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/295
** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu)
I troubleshooted this initially in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1962170, when all
tests were failing, and reached the same patch that mwhudson did, but
the tests were still failing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The package isn't regressing tests since it's not present in the release
pocket at the moment. In any case adsys is in a target promotion for
desktop for the incoming LTS, bug #1936907, we will own the issues as we
do for any of our other packages.
--
You received this bug notification because
Removing the tag means that this package will reenter the release pocket
with failing tests. Who is responsible for fixing these tests? The
standard for proposed-migration is that we don't regret tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
removing the blocker tag since python3-defaults migrated now
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962510
Title:
failing tests with new sssd, blocks python3-defaults
To manage
removing the blocker tag since python3-defaults migrated now
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962510
Title:
failing tests with new sssd, blocks python3-defaults
To manage
removing the blocker tag since python3-defaults migrated now
** Tags removed: block-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962510
Title:
failing tests with new sssd, blocks
These tests are a firehose, but I think this is the only failure on
armhf: "--- FAIL: TestInit/Configuration_changed (0.00s)"
--- FAIL: TestInit (2.22s)
--- PASS: TestInit/Error_on_config_flag_points_to_unexisting_path (0.00s)
--- PASS:
why removing the package rather than just hinting the test results?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962510
Title:
failing tests with new sssd, blocks python3-defaults
To manage
why removing the package rather than just hinting the test results?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962510
Title:
failing tests with new sssd, blocks python3-defaults
To manage
11 matches
Mail list logo
