[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-06-07 Thread parq
I've just updated again the kernel and the update-grub bug is still happens.
Today (07/06/08) I've updated the system through update manager and the kernel 
was updated to 2.6.24.18.20.
Then ucf ask for an option about what to do with menu.lst option, and i 
selected 1st (used the new proposed or something similar).
So update-grub updates the kernel list, but changes disk id:

 root=hd(0,5) - root=hd(0,0)

I've to say that is a partition with winxp, but it hasn't to be a cause for 
such a bug. 
In a new user, it means a broken system and could be hard to fix. For 
experienced user, a simple livecd boot will help to access to the filesystem 
and fix it.

I've installed ubuntu 8.04 in a fresh install and every kernel update
i've the same bug. (2 kernel updates from ubuntu release at 21/04/08).

More info:
linux-image-generic 2.6.24.18.20
grub 0.97-29ubuntu21

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-06-07 Thread Steve Langasek
parq,

The fix for this bug is that, when your locally-modified menu.lst
disagrees with how update-grub would calculate the boot entries, a
warning is shown letting you know about this inconsistency.  There is no
way that we can reliably fix the fact that the autogenerated entries
don't match your local modifications, because the generated entries are
generated based on the kopt and groot values that you didn't modify.
The best we can hope to achieve, short of migrating to a completely
different config syntax (grub2), is to warn the user about
inconsistencies, which is indeed what has been done here.

To ultimately resolve this inconsistency on your system, you should
update the groot variable within menu.lst and re-run update-grub.

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-05-12 Thread Richard Laager
Ted Cabeen: The exact same thing is happening to me. I filed this as a
separate bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/229656

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-04-18 Thread Ted Cabeen
The ucf changes in 0.97-29ubuntu7 seem to have broken some update-grub
workflows.

In gutsy and before, you could setup a basic menu.list containing
update-grub options but no kernels, run update-grub, and get your
kernels correctly added to the menu.lst file.  Now, if a menu.lst exists
at all when you run update-grub, it won't insert new kernels.  Also, if
you remove kernels from menu.lst, there's no way to get them back
automatically, other than removing menu.lst entirely and running update-
grub.  Is there some magical string I need to put in my menu.lst to get
it to add kernels that aren't already there?

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-02-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:04:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
 FWIW, this was tracked down to a difference in the content of the entries
 being written out by grub based on the output of 'lsb_release -d', and was
 resolved in grub 0.97-29ubuntu14.

Thanks for following up.

-- 
 - mdz

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-02-28 Thread jbfrank
Hi Steve,

Thanks very much. I don't understand all the details but to hear it's
been fixed makes me happy :)

BR,
Cheski

- Original Message 
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 3:04:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive 
with respect to user modifications

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:36:12AM +, Matt Zimmerman wrote:

 Attached are /boot/grub/menu.lst and /boot/grub/menu.lst~.  Assuming this is
 the backup from ucf, this should be what you need.  Notice that all of the
 kernel lines are unmodified.

 I saw exactly the same behaviour on both my desktop and my laptop upon
 upgrading to this version of grub.  The laptop was a fresh 7.10 install
 upgraded to Hardy, with very little customization.

FWIW, this was tracked down to a difference in the content of the entries
being written out by grub based on the output of 'lsb_release -d', and was
resolved in grub 0.97-29ubuntu14.

There have been some further issues with upgrades from 6.06 to hardy on
account of differences in the overall behavior of update-grub in those older
versions; these issues are tracked as bug #187362.

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of a duplicate bug.




  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-02-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:36:12AM +, Matt Zimmerman wrote:

 Attached are /boot/grub/menu.lst and /boot/grub/menu.lst~.  Assuming this is
 the backup from ucf, this should be what you need.  Notice that all of the
 kernel lines are unmodified.

 I saw exactly the same behaviour on both my desktop and my laptop upon
 upgrading to this version of grub.  The laptop was a fresh 7.10 install
 upgraded to Hardy, with very little customization.

FWIW, this was tracked down to a difference in the content of the entries
being written out by grub based on the output of 'lsb_release -d', and was
resolved in grub 0.97-29ubuntu14.

There have been some further issues with upgrades from 6.06 to hardy on
account of differences in the overall behavior of update-grub in those older
versions; these issues are tracked as bug #187362.

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-02-13 Thread m_gol
I have such a partition configuration:
/dev/sda1: /boot
/dev/sda2: swap
/dev/sda3: windows
/dev/sda5: /
/dev/sda6: /home

In my menu.lst file I have lines containing: root (hd0,0) which is
true. Nonetheless, after every kernel update, it automatically changes
to hd(0,1) which breaks running of Ubuntu, forcing me to manually
change it back.

It's not very much problem for me, but I also installed Ubuntu at my
family's computer and it's strange if GRUB gets broken after just an
update.

My (PROPER!) /boot/grub/menu.lst ends with that:
## ## End Default Options ##

title   Ubuntu 7.10, kernel 2.6.22-14-generic
root(hd0,0)
kernel  /vmlinuz-2.6.22-14-generic 
root=UUID=27771eab-0c14-46c4-86cc-3883a332c1c5 ro quiet splash
initrd  /initrd.img-2.6.22-14-generic
quiet

title   Ubuntu 7.10, kernel 2.6.22-14-generic (recovery mode)
root(hd0,0)
kernel  /vmlinuz-2.6.22-14-generic 
root=UUID=27771eab-0c14-46c4-86cc-3883a332c1c5 ro single
initrd  /initrd.img-2.6.22-14-generic

title   Ubuntu 7.10, memtest86+
root(hd0,0)
kernel  /memtest86+.bin
quiet

### END DEBIAN AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST
(...)


-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-01-29 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:07:01AM -, Steve Langasek wrote:
 In my pre-upload tests, I did not find that the first upgrade to
 0.97-29ubuntu7 triggered a ucf prompt except in the case where there was
 already a detectable difference between the magic comments and the
 kernel list.  This is AFAICS a necessary evil in order to get the
 current state of the config file registered with ucf; waiting until the
 first kernel upgrade only increases the chances of a ucf prompt that
 might have oterwise been avoided, but it should not result in any
 prompts where the menu.lst has not been locally modified.  Can you
 provide a copy of a menu.lst that results in a prompt when you think it
 shouldn't?

Attached are /boot/grub/menu.lst and /boot/grub/menu.lst~.  Assuming this is
the backup from ucf, this should be what you need.  Notice that all of the
kernel lines are unmodified.

I saw exactly the same behaviour on both my desktop and my laptop upon
upgrading to this version of grub.  The laptop was a fresh 7.10 install
upgraded to Hardy, with very little customization.

-- 
 - mdz


# menu.lst - See: grub(8), info grub, update-grub(8)
#grub-install(8), grub-floppy(8),
#grub-md5-crypt, /usr/share/doc/grub
#and /usr/share/doc/grub-doc/.

## default num
# Set the default entry to the entry number NUM. Numbering starts from 0, and
# the entry number 0 is the default if the command is not used.
#
# You can specify 'saved' instead of a number. In this case, the default entry
# is the entry saved with the command 'savedefault'.   
default 0

## timeout sec
# Set a timeout, in SEC seconds, before automatically booting the default entry
# (normally the first entry defined).
timeout 3

## hiddenmenu
# Hides the menu by default (press ESC to see the menu)
hiddenmenu

# Pretty colours
#color cyan/blue white/blue

## password ['--md5'] passwd
# If used in the first section of a menu file, disable all interactive editing
# control (menu entry editor and command-line)  and entries protected by the
# command 'lock'
# e.g. password topsecret
#  password --md5 $1$gLhU0/$aW78kHK1QfV3P2b2znUoe/
# password topsecret

#
# examples
#
# title Windows 95/98/NT/2000
# root  (hd0,0)
# makeactive
# chainloader   +1
#
# title Linux
# root  (hd0,1)
# kernel/vmlinuz root=/dev/hda2 ro
#

#
# Put static boot stanzas before and/or after AUTOMAGIC KERNEL LIST

### BEGIN AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST
## lines between the AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST markers will be modified
## by the debian update-grub script except for the default options below

## DO NOT UNCOMMENT THEM, Just edit them to your needs

## ## Start Default Options ##
## default kernel options
## default kernel options for automagic boot options
## If you want special options for specific kernels use kopt_x_y_z
## where x.y.z is kernel version. Minor versions can be omitted.
## e.g. kopt=root=/dev/hda1 ro
##  kopt_2_6_8=root=/dev/hdc1 ro
##  kopt_2_6_8_2_686=root=/dev/hdc2 ro
# kopt=root=UUID=daf1bf61-d974-4e90-b2c7-5f4dfa4e56cf ro

## Setup crashdump menu entries
## e.g. crashdump=1
# crashdump=0

## default grub root device
## e.g. groot=(hd0,0)
# groot=(hd0,0)

## should update-grub create alternative automagic boot options
## e.g. alternative=true
##  alternative=false
# alternative=true

## should update-grub lock alternative automagic boot options
## e.g. lockalternative=true
##  lockalternative=false
# lockalternative=false

## additional options to use with the default boot option, but not with the
## alternatives
## e.g. defoptions=vga=791 resume=/dev/hda5
# defoptions=quiet splash

## should update-grub lock old automagic boot options
## e.g. lockold=false
##  lockold=true
# lockold=false

## Xen hypervisor options to use with the default Xen boot option
# xenhopt=

## Xen Linux kernel options to use with the default Xen boot option
# xenkopt=console=tty0

## altoption boot targets option
## multiple altoptions lines are allowed
## e.g. altoptions=(extra menu suffix) extra boot options
##  altoptions=(recovery) single
# altoptions=(recovery mode) single

## controls how many kernels should be put into the menu.lst
## only counts the first occurence of a kernel, not the
## alternative kernel options
## e.g. howmany=all
##  howmany=7
# howmany=all

## should update-grub create memtest86 boot option
## e.g. memtest86=true
##  memtest86=false
# memtest86=true

## should update-grub adjust the value of the default booted system
## can be true or false
# updatedefaultentry=false

## should update-grub add savedefault to the default options
## can be true or false
# savedefault=false

## ## End Default Options ##

title   Ubuntu hardy (development branch), kernel 2.6.24-5-generic 
Default
root(hd0,0)
kernel  /boot/vmlinuz root=UUID=daf1bf61-d974-4e90-b2c7-5f4dfa4e56cf ro 
quiet splash
initrd  /boot/initrd.img
quiet

title

Re: [Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-01-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:56:25PM -, Steve Langasek wrote:
 This bug has been fixed in hardy, in grub version 0.97-29ubuntu7 and
 above:
 
 grub (0.97-29ubuntu7) hardy; urgency=low
 
   * debian/update-grub: use ucf to record changes to the autogenerated
 kernel list
 
 It is still advisable that boot options for other operating systems such
 as Windows be added outside the automagic kernels list markers, but
 going forward users will receive a debconf warning from update-grub if
 the update will overwrite local changes.

This is certainly an improvement, but it seems to always trigger on the
first upgrade to 0.97-29ubuntu7 or later, even if the file hasn't been
modified.  Is it possible to fix that, so that it's silent unless the user
actually modifies the file?

-- 
 - mdz

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-01-28 Thread Steve Langasek
This bug has been fixed in hardy, in grub version 0.97-29ubuntu7 and
above:

grub (0.97-29ubuntu7) hardy; urgency=low

  * debian/update-grub: use ucf to record changes to the autogenerated
kernel list

It is still advisable that boot options for other operating systems such
as Windows be added outside the automagic kernels list markers, but
going forward users will receive a debconf warning from update-grub if
the update will overwrite local changes.


** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu Hardy)
   Importance: Medium = High
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2008-01-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Matt,

In my pre-upload tests, I did not find that the first upgrade to
0.97-29ubuntu7 triggered a ucf prompt except in the case where there was
already a detectable difference between the magic comments and the
kernel list.  This is AFAICS a necessary evil in order to get the
current state of the config file registered with ucf; waiting until the
first kernel upgrade only increases the chances of a ucf prompt that
might have oterwise been avoided, but it should not result in any
prompts where the menu.lst has not been locally modified.  Can you
provide a copy of a menu.lst that results in a prompt when you think it
shouldn't?

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2007-12-19 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
** Tags added: qa-hardy-list

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2007-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
I agree with mdz, of course. Untargeting from Gutsy.

** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu)
   Target: ubuntu-7.10-beta = None

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2007-09-05 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu)
   Target: None = ubuntu-7.10-beta

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2007-09-05 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 07:58:22AM -, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
 ** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu)
Target: None = ubuntu-7.10-beta

Unfortunately, fixing this isn't straightforward, and requires designing a
different solution, documenting it, and hopefully pushing it up to Debian to
avoid diverging forever.  As Colin notes, it also affects the installer.

As such, I don't think it's practical to target it for 7.10.  I think this
would be a natural target for 8.04 LTS though.

-- 
 - mdz

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2007-08-29 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
Colin, is something we have a realistic hope of addressing for Gutsy or
should we spec up better grub management as a feature for Gutsy+1? (we
could also do with a boot config GUI)

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2007-06-25 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Installer Team

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2007-06-07 Thread Colin Watson
If changing this, note that there are installer implications and that
this needs to be handled carefully. In general this needs careful design
to ensure that the result isn't just as bad ...

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2006-09-13 Thread Martin Andersen
Adding the Windows boot options before the Automagic lines results in
the Splashimage not appearing, so the bootlist really has to come after
all the options, so there is no proper way of reordering the bootlist
with anything before Ubuntu.

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://launchpad.net/bugs/21412

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2006-09-11 Thread michael chesterton
** Bug 59895 has been marked a duplicate of this bug

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://launchpad.net/bugs/21412

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2006-09-11 Thread Martin Andersen
To get Windows (or any other OS) to appear first in the list, it is necessary 
to add it BEFORE the Automagic section, which is before all the Options and 
example comments, which is less than ideal. It would be OK to have an Ubuntu 
section with all its kernels, as long as you can add entries before and after 
as needed/desired, without having to go above the options and comments section.
It is able to leave my Splashimage line alone in Dapper, which it didn't 
previously, so it should be able to do the same for non-Ubuntu entries.

All this would be moot if there were a proper Graphical Grub editor,
which is a separate issue.

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://launchpad.net/bugs/21412

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 21412] Re: Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user modifications

2006-07-15 Thread Matt Zimmerman
** Summary changed:

- Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive
+ Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications

-- 
Default update-grub behaviour is not intuitive with respect to user 
modifications
https://launchpad.net/bugs/21412

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs