It was committed, cheers.
--
Tech Review of dualboot.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Ok, it's in the archive then, marking as released.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Tech Review of dualboot.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Dougie - can you confirm that this patch was committed to the intrepid
branch? it looks like it from the bug status but wasn't expressly
confirmed in the last comment.
--
Tech Review of dualboot.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219792
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thanks CloudFX, great work.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
Tech Review of dualboot.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Reviewing:
- [to be aware of a small number of related concepts.] Changed to [to be aware
of several related concepts.] - I disagree as several implies a great number
of, suggest - to be aware of related concepts.
- [NTFS, to which Linux cannot safely write data] - ntfs3g is pretty stable and
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Tech Review of dualboot.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: Patch for errors found in dualboot.xml
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13584227/dualboot-edit.txt
--
Tech Review of dualboot.xml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
