I'm still experiencing this issue. Ubuntu hardy, patched up to date as
of this writing.
pj...@patslinux01 ~ $ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS
Release:8.04
Codename: hardy
pj...@patslinux01 ~ $ uname -a
Linux
I'm still experiencing this issue. Ubuntu hardy, patched up to date as
of this writing.
pj...@patslinux01 ~ $ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS
Release:8.04
Codename: hardy
pj...@patslinux01 ~ $ uname -a
Linux
Unfortunately, CIFS with Kerberos auth is broken in Intrepid, due to bug
298208. Has anyone here gotten the upcall business to work in 8.10?
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Unfortunately, CIFS with Kerberos auth is broken in Intrepid, due to bug
298208. Has anyone here gotten the upcall business to work in 8.10?
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Copied to hardy-updates. The package was successfully tested in bug
259110. If this bug is not fixed for you in the hardy update, please
report back here, then we'll reopen this. Thank you!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
cifs does not support
Copied to hardy-updates. The package was successfully tested in bug
259110. If this bug is not fixed for you in the hardy update, please
report back here, then we'll reopen this. Thank you!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
cifs does not support
create cifs.upcall * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k %d
The line in /etc/request-key.conf should look like the following instead:
create cifs.spnego**/usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k %d
The key name is indeed cifs.spnego, only the executable name change.
--
cifs does not support
create cifs.upcall * * /usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k %d
The line in /etc/request-key.conf should look like the following instead:
create cifs.spnego**/usr/sbin/cifs.upcall %k %d
The key name is indeed cifs.spnego, only the executable name change.
--
cifs does not support
I can't make this work for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy$ sudo mount.cifs //127.0.0.1/bigdisc /tmp/foo
-ousername=atm26,sec=krb5,guest --verbose
parsing options: username=atm26,sec=krb5,guest
mount.cifs kernel mount options
I can't make this work for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hardy$ sudo mount.cifs //127.0.0.1/bigdisc /tmp/foo
-ousername=atm26,sec=krb5,guest --verbose
parsing options: username=atm26,sec=krb5,guest
mount.cifs kernel mount options
linux 2.6.24-21 copied to hardy-updates.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
linux 2.6.24-21 copied to hardy-updates.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
cifs does not support
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
cifs does not support
Looks ok to me. I pinged bug 259110 for testers, if it can be tested
soon and we can move the current samba SRU to -updates first, I'd prefer
waiting a bit instead of stacking SRUs on top of each other.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You
samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 uploaded with the backported cifs.upcall
implementation. Martin, could you please review?
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Looks ok to me. I pinged bug 259110 for testers, if it can be tested
soon and we can move the current samba SRU to -updates first, I'd prefer
waiting a bit instead of stacking SRUs on top of each other.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You
Steve,
will you be able to provide this update for Hardy or will this only be
in Intrepid? Including this in Hardy would releave us of serious
issues with developing a Linux desktop alternative :-)
Maxim Burgerhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint
1CC2 A9B2 FE2E 799D 01DB 8A89
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:29:39AM -, wzzrd wrote:
will you be able to provide this update for Hardy or will this only be
in Intrepid? Including this in Hardy would releave us of serious
issues with developing a Linux desktop alternative :-)
The fix is already present in intrepid; this
Ah, yes, I see, sorry
thanks for fixing this
Maxim
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
Steve,
will you be able to provide this update for Hardy or will this only be
in Intrepid? Including this in Hardy would releave us of serious
issues with developing a Linux desktop alternative :-)
Maxim Burgerhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint
1CC2 A9B2 FE2E 799D 01DB 8A89
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:29:39AM -, wzzrd wrote:
will you be able to provide this update for Hardy or will this only be
in Intrepid? Including this in Hardy would releave us of serious
issues with developing a Linux desktop alternative :-)
The fix is already present in intrepid; this
Ah, yes, I see, sorry
thanks for fixing this
Maxim
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
To follow-up regarding the comment from Steve on 2008-08-15, it does
work now indeed. Basically, it is entirely my fault for not configuring
the Samba server for Kerberos authentication. For the record, you need
to set the use kerberos keytab and realm options of smb.conf. Duh.
Steve: I see
upstream has stabilized the name of the executable now, so providing an
update that includes the cifs.upcall helper instead of cifs.spnego just
waits on me having the cycles available to do it.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received
To follow-up regarding the comment from Steve on 2008-08-15, it does
work now indeed. Basically, it is entirely my fault for not configuring
the Samba server for Kerberos authentication. For the record, you need
to set the use kerberos keytab and realm options of smb.conf. Duh.
Steve: I see
upstream has stabilized the name of the executable now, so providing an
update that includes the cifs.upcall helper instead of cifs.spnego just
waits on me having the cycles available to do it.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received
Tested the mount.cifs //172.18.100.35/open open/
-ousername=lager,sec=krb5i,guest --verbose command again and it worked
fine. Used the new kernel version:
linux-image-2.6.26-5-server-2.6.26-5.17
Thanks Steve.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Tested the mount.cifs //172.18.100.35/open open/
-ousername=lager,sec=krb5i,guest --verbose command again and it worked
fine. Used the new kernel version:
linux-image-2.6.26-5-server-2.6.26-5.17
Thanks Steve.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Etienne,
What kernel version are you running? That output appears to be
consistent with what I see on a kernel that doesn't have CIFS upcall
support enabled.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you
I've just checked, and when using sec=krb5 against a server with no
kerberos support, and a client with CIFS upcall support enabled (and
keyutils installed) but without cifs.spnego configured, I get a
different error:
mount error 126 = Required key not available
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual
Etienne,
What kernel version are you running? That output appears to be
consistent with what I see on a kernel that doesn't have CIFS upcall
support enabled.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you
I've just checked, and when using sec=krb5 against a server with no
kerberos support, and a client with CIFS upcall support enabled (and
keyutils installed) but without cifs.spnego configured, I get a
different error:
mount error 126 = Required key not available
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual
I am running 2.6.24-20.38 from hardy-proposed. /boot/config-`uname -r`
show that CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL=y is set. If it work for you, that mean
the problem is somewhere else on my side.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug
Ok; I've tested against the same server that Etienne was testing
against, and found the particular error reproducible; also from my own
client, where I was getting the 'Required key not available' message
instead of the 'Function not implemented' error. I think the 'not
implemented' is associated
Adam, the kernel oops you're experiencing appears to be specific to that
kernel version, and unrelated to the general question of whether cifs
upcall support is enabled in the Ubuntu kernel. Please file a separate
bug report for this issue.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
I still get the (rather unhelpful) error:
mount error 38 = Function not implemented
I am not sure if the problem is with mount.cifs, or if it is something about
the way I am set up. If someone who report success with backported 3.2.0 could
try with the 3.0.28a package in Steve's PPA,
I still get the (rather unhelpful) error:
mount error 38 = Function not implemented
I am not sure if the problem is with mount.cifs, or if it is something about
the way I am set up. If someone who report success with backported 3.2.0 could
try with the 3.0.28a package in Steve's PPA,
Not sure if this helps, but when I try to mounting a share, on Intrepid,
with:
mount.cifs //172.18.100.35/open open/ -ousername=lager,sec=krb5i,guest
--verbose
It prints the command with the uid and gid then Segmentation fault.
Attached is I think the relevant dmesg output. Packages:
A package that includes a preliminary cifs.spnego backport is now
available in my ppa; please try adding
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/vorlon/ubuntu hardy main
to your apt sources.list and test the smbfs package there.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
I suspect that you're seeing a periodic TGT refresh from Likewise; pam_krb5
doesn't provide infrastructure to refresh tickets automatically for you, but
winbind/likewise do.
I figured as much. I knew Heimdal provided a similar feature, but I
had too little to do with recent versions of Winbind
I suspect that you're seeing a periodic TGT refresh from Likewise; pam_krb5
doesn't provide infrastructure to refresh tickets automatically for you, but
winbind/likewise do.
I figured as much. I knew Heimdal provided a similar feature, but I
had too little to do with recent versions of Winbind
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:59:56AM -, wzzrd wrote:
I followed your instructions above (the request-key.conf stuff) and I am
now able to mount a cifs share on my machine. So the kernel patch works,
that's for sure; at least for a Kerberos cache generated during Likewise
login (I use
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:59:56AM -, wzzrd wrote:
I followed your instructions above (the request-key.conf stuff) and I am
now able to mount a cifs share on my machine. So the kernel patch works,
that's for sure; at least for a Kerberos cache generated during Likewise
login (I use
I did some quick'n dirty samba backport from intrepid to hardy for my
own needs. With the hardy-propposed kernel, it works like a charm (both
krb5 and krb5i).
I needed to backport libtalloc1 too.
You can find those packages in :
http://www.crapouillou.net/~jocelyn/debian/samba-hardy-backport/
Jocelyn,
could you check whether you are able to mount with sec=krb5i? I can't
do that with the Samba I built from source right now.
Thanks!
Maxim Burgerhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint
1CC2 A9B2 FE2E 799D 01DB 8A89 0AE8 B60A ACA3 4452
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:48,
I can use krb5i
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I did some quick'n dirty samba backport from intrepid to hardy for my
own needs. With the hardy-propposed kernel, it works like a charm (both
krb5 and krb5i).
I needed to backport libtalloc1 too.
You can find those packages in :
http://www.crapouillou.net/~jocelyn/debian/samba-hardy-backport/
Jocelyn,
could you check whether you are able to mount with sec=krb5i? I can't
do that with the Samba I built from source right now.
Thanks!
Maxim Burgerhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint
1CC2 A9B2 FE2E 799D 01DB 8A89 0AE8 B60A ACA3 4452
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:48,
I can use krb5i
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi Steve,
I had downloaded the source tarball from Samba.org at home and I'm not
able to download the source deb from Intrepid at work, so I built Samba
3.2.0 from source and created a deb with checkinstall. Quick dirty.
After pulling in the correct -dev packages, I configured with:
Hi Steve,
I had downloaded the source tarball from Samba.org at home and I'm not
able to download the source deb from Intrepid at work, so I built Samba
3.2.0 from source and created a deb with checkinstall. Quick dirty.
After pulling in the correct -dev packages, I configured with:
Hi wzzrd,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:05:43AM -, wzzrd wrote:
Steve, can you please tell whether the backport of the cifs.spnego
upcall helper will be in Hardy? I see the patch to the kernel config has
been committed, but I'm not sure about the status of the rest of the
solution.
I
Hi wzzrd,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:05:43AM -, wzzrd wrote:
Steve, can you please tell whether the backport of the cifs.spnego
upcall helper will be in Hardy? I see the patch to the kernel config has
been committed, but I'm not sure about the status of the rest of the
solution.
I
I'ld really like to help test this, but I am a bit crippled by our
firewall: not apt for me. Can you provide me with the packages you used
to install cifs.spnego? I downloaded the new kernel at home yesterday,
but I am unable to find Samba packages containing the new backported
helper.
Can you
I'ld really like to help test this, but I am a bit crippled by our
firewall: not apt for me. Can you provide me with the packages you used
to install cifs.spnego? I downloaded the new kernel at home yesterday,
but I am unable to find Samba packages containing the new backported
helper.
Can you
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 2:3.2.0-3ubuntu1
---
samba (2:3.2.0-3ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low
* Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
* debian/patches/VERSION.patch:
- set SAMBA_VERSION_VENDOR_SUFFIX to Ubuntu.
* debian/smb.conf
- add
Steve, can you please tell whether the backport of the cifs.spnego
upcall helper will be in Hardy? I see the patch to the kernel config has
been committed, but I'm not sure about the status of the rest of the
solution.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Tags added:
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Triaged
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Steve, can you please tell whether the backport of the cifs.spnego
upcall helper will be in Hardy? I see the patch to the kernel config has
been committed, but I'm not sure about the status of the rest of the
solution.
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Tags added:
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed = Triaged
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.26-3.7
---
linux (2.6.26-3.7) intrepid; urgency=low
[Amit Kucheria]
* SAUCE: make fc transport removal of target configurable
- LP: #163075
* SAUCE: pm: Config option to disable handling of console during
suspend/resume
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.26-3.7
---
linux (2.6.26-3.7) intrepid; urgency=low
[Amit Kucheria]
* SAUCE: make fc transport removal of target configurable
- LP: #163075
* SAUCE: pm: Config option to disable handling of console during
suspend/resume
Hi,
just to be able to plan: Will this be fixed in Hardy eventuall, or only
in newer releases?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
hardy.git;a=commit;h=5ecd2c7ef329ed53d583a10c16cf0d35d83edd7b
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
Target: None = ubuntu-8.04.2
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
Hi,
just to be able to plan: Will this be fixed in Hardy eventuall, or only
in newer releases?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
SRU Justification:
Impact: CIFS cannot authenticate against Kerberos
Patch Description: Enable CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL in the kernel.
Patch: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
hardy.git;a=commit;h=5ecd2c7ef329ed53d583a10c16cf0d35d83edd7b
Test Case: See bug description
--
cifs does not
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
hardy.git;a=commit;h=5ecd2c7ef329ed53d583a10c16cf0d35d83edd7b
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
Target: None = ubuntu-8.04.2
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
* Kernel change is isolated, that looks reasonably ok. I take it
CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL does not change any behaviour, just enables
CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL config option? Does CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL only enables the
userspace callback for authorization (cifs.spnego) or any other behaviour?
* I
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = Confirmed
--
cifs does not support kerberos
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
* Kernel change is isolated, that looks reasonably ok. I take it
CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL does not change any behaviour, just enables
CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL config option? Does CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL only enables the
userspace callback for authorization (cifs.spnego) or any other behaviour?
* I
The CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL enables a number of unrelated features, all
of which should be no-ops by default:
- CIFS ACL mapping
- dnotify support
- export ops (stub support for re-exporting via NFS)
and it allows the CIFS_UPCALL option to be enabled.
CIFS_UPCALL only turns on support for
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = Confirmed
--
cifs does not support kerberos
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'm afraid you'll find that sec=krb5 consistently gives the following
results:
$ mount.cifs //borges/pub /tmp/testmount -osec=krb5
Password:
mount error 38 = Function not implemented
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
$
Of course, mount.cifs(8) doesn't give any
Sorry, I'm afraid this bug is going to become something of a dumping
ground for my investigations; this is getting complicated enough that I
need somewhere to keep track of all the bits and pieces needed to get
this working (...almost).
Software needed:
- 2.6.24 kernel with the
Here is the patch used for the kernel; tested on amd64
** Attachment added: patch to enable CIFS+kerberos in the kernel
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15159794/linux-cifs-experimental.diff
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
I'm afraid you'll find that sec=krb5 consistently gives the following
results:
$ mount.cifs //borges/pub /tmp/testmount -osec=krb5
Password:
mount error 38 = Function not implemented
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
$
Of course, mount.cifs(8) doesn't give any
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sorry, I'm afraid this bug is going to become something of a dumping
ground for my investigations; this is getting complicated enough that I
need somewhere to keep track of all the bits and pieces needed to get
this working (...almost).
Software needed:
- 2.6.24 kernel with the
Here is the patch used for the kernel; tested on amd64
** Attachment added: patch to enable CIFS+kerberos in the kernel
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15159794/linux-cifs-experimental.diff
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Nick,
Can yout try using sec=krb5?
Thanks
chuck
--
cifs does not support kerberos authentication
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This is a MASSIVE showstopper for many people. cifs doesn't mount things
that smbfs used to, and smbfs is now just a pointer to cifs. So now
there is no way to mount network shares if they are kerberos-auth only.
This, in effect, renders previously perfectly-working Linux machines on
a corporate
This is a MASSIVE showstopper for many people. cifs doesn't mount things
that smbfs used to, and smbfs is now just a pointer to cifs. So now
there is no way to mount network shares if they are kerberos-auth only.
This, in effect, renders previously perfectly-working Linux machines on
a corporate
92 matches
Mail list logo
