[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs

2008-11-06 Thread I am Matt Jones
This still exists in Hardy. 
Proxy is set in both Gnome and APT. FFx works perfectly, command line apt or 
Synaptic Package Manager and Update-Manager fail to connect to the proxy.

W: Failed to fetch 
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/n/nautilus-sendto/nautilus-sendto_0.13.2-0ubuntu3_i386.deb
  Could not resolve '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

-- 
Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs

2008-05-19 Thread Scott Severance
Please set the importance of this bug much higher than it currently is.
This bug is preventing me from upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy, because
for bandwidth reasons I have to use apt-cacher.

Note, though, that update-manager should follow APT's proxy settings,
not GNOME's settings.

-- 
Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs

2007-11-02 Thread Claudio Satriano
I agree with Richard: bug #113658 is related to this.

Also people here at my university lab (where we use apt-cacher to save
bandwith) would benefit a lot!

(p.s. Richard: put # before the bug number, in order to have automatic
linking ;) )

-- 
Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs

2007-11-02 Thread Richard
I have had a similar problem during a Feisty to Gutsy upgrade using apt-
cacher as proxy (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/+bug/113658 ), but it's a generic proxy problem.  If Canonical
are serious about the corporate market, where proxy servers are very
common, they need to fix this sort of bug...  Having to hack around on
the command line is fine for me since I've used Linux for ages, but
users new to Linux will probably just give up or have to use the apt-get
upgrade method, which of course can lead to breakage that requires
*more* expertise to fix.

Please fix this bug and the 113658 bug.  Your corporate users will thank
you!

-- 
Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs

2007-06-15 Thread Christophe Olinger
Unsetting http_proxy solved the problem in gutsy also. This problem
persits since edgy. Why is it not solved yet?

-- 
Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs

2007-04-26 Thread Matt Mossholder
I think I know what is going on here. When you set the proxy settings in
your Gnome Preferences, it does two different things:

  - Sets the /system/http_proxy gconf keys
  - Sets the $http_proxy environment variable.

It appears to be the second of these that is causing the problem (at
least for me). If you do an  "unset http_proxy" from the command line,
and then do a "sudo update-manager" things work fine.  There doesn't
appear to be anything wrong with the content of the $http_proxy variable
(i.e. http://:@:/ ), so I can only
assume that update manager isn't parsing it correctly.

-- 
Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs

2007-04-26 Thread Sven Herzberg
I still don't think that the gnome proxy settings should be what update-
manager should look at for several reasons:

1. I might run update-manager with root permissions (remember: I might even do 
this without a proper intention, because all the update tools need superuser 
priviliges) - then there's no way to access the gnome proxy settings of the 
user anymore
2. The technical reason: update-manager serves (in a rough view) as a front-end 
to apt. Listening to the gnome proxy settings is nice, but as long as the 
apt-settings are not correct (or - by mistake or intention - apt and gnome have 
different proxy settings), update-manager should still use exactly the same 
mechanism as apt does.

Use case: set up a local apt proxy for Ubuntu and use an http proxy to
forward all apt-requests to is, but the default web access is provided
by the plain router setup.

-- 
Doesn't honor gnome proxy settigs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs