[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Looks like we're not going to be able to drop -dbg packages, but I think fabo from Debian said that they were picking up some of our -dbg work for Qt 4.6. This can be closed, anyways. ** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
I saw that the patch was integrated in the last package 4.5.3 uploaded for karmic, note however that the source don't compile because the patch still as the old path in it, i.e. +--- qt4-x11-4.4.3.orig/mkspecs/common/linux.conf 2008-12-31 11:20:45.0 +0100 qt4-x11-4.4.3/mkspecs/common/linux.conf2008-12-31 11:21:36.0 +0100 instead of the usual a/ and b/. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
I've uploaded this debdiff following review by Bo Thorsten. Thanks Martin von Gagern. We'll revisit this in Karmic. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Martin, thanks for your work on this. Some questions/notes: - Do we really need to explicitly build -dbg packages, given that pkg- create-dbgsym already builds them for every package in the archive anyway? The long-term goal is actually to remove -dbg packages entirely (and we are pondering doing that on the Ubuntu builds). As long as the package builds with -O2 -g and leaves stripping to dh_strip, it should Just Work. That works for tens of thousands of other packages. So perhaps the -no-separate-debug-info addition and debian/patches/bug261380-nostrip.diff is everything that's required here? - the lintian overrides should be removed from the patch. Lintian should't complain about /usr/lib/debug/, that's a lintian bug. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
It took me a while to find the relevant documentation about pkg-create-dbgsym: https://launchpad.net/pkg-create-dbgsym https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptElfDebugSymbols https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/apt-get-debug-symbols If this is really the way to go, some reference in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide would be useful. I'm not an experienced Ubuntu/Debian packager, but here is my impression comparing those two solutions: 1. My patch, using cdbs and old -dbg packages - additional -dbg packages added to control - debug symbols from multiple binary packages can be collected in one debug package - easy to build on ppa and install locally using apt-get 2. Your suggested method, using pkg-create-dbgsym and new ddeb packages - all -dbg packages removed from control - exact 1:1 corresponcence between binary packages and debug packages - don't know how to install those packages locally, nor how ppa deals with them As https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptElfDebugSymbols#apt%20changes regarding installation of debug symbols doesn't seem implemented yet, at least not on my intrepid, I'm not convinced that this approach is ready to replace the old -dbg packages yet. I still created a corresponding patch. About lintian: I haven't understood the functioning of lintian yet, nor the reason for those overrides in the old package. My renames were simply intended to have as little impact on current behaviour as possible. I'd be happy to drop them. If we drop the -dbg packages, the corresponding lintian files have to go in any case. ** Attachment added: debdiff dropping -dbg packages http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24043248/qt4-x11_4.5.0-0ubuntu2_to_4.5.0-0ubuntu3%7Eppa1j.debdiff -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
If we dropped the dbg packages now, that would mean we would have to drop the dbg packages from every KDE module since kdelibs5-dbg depends on the qt4 -dbg packages, and every kde dbg package depends on kdelibs5-dbg. That would be a somewhat large change this late in the cycle, and it would create an annoying delta with Debian. I say that for Jaunty we should just fix the -dbg packages, and then maybe we can consider going to dbgsym packages in Karmic. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Jonathan Thomas [2009-03-18 12:23 -]: If we dropped the dbg packages now, that would mean we would have to drop the dbg packages from every KDE module since kdelibs5-dbg depends on the qt4 -dbg packages, and every kde dbg package depends on kdelibs5-dbg. That would be a somewhat large change this late in the cycle, and it would create an annoying delta with Debian. I say that for Jaunty we should just fix the -dbg packages, and then maybe we can consider going to dbgsym packages in Karmic. Thanks, that makes sense. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
OK, yet another debdiff. Revertet to -dbg packages (including a few extra ones), dropped the lintian overrides, and also completed the mapping from non-debug to debug packages, as the implicit cdbs build logic didn't work as I originally expected. Currently queued in my ppa, let's see... ** Attachment added: debdiff dropping lintian http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24056183/qt4-x11_4.5.0-0ubuntu2_to_4.5.0-0ubuntu3%7Eppa2j.debdiff -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Do I understand you correctly that the diff in my PPA is enough for now, rendering Marco's request for a patch obsolete? So now I wait for some sponsor to have a look at this, and work out the next steps based on his opinion? The version against which my patch was created is no longer current. Should I create a new patch, and if so, against Jaunty, Intrepid, or both? -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Ah, indeed, I overlooked that. I apologize. Debdiff: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20834194/qt4-x11_4.4.3-0ubuntu1_4.4.3-0ubuntu1.2%7Eppa0i.diff.gz I subscribed the sponsoring team. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
The resulting list of debug symbol files looks somewhat longer, needs to be invedtigated still. I've investigated this now. The original debug packages only contained debug symbols for libraries. With my patch in place, it contains debug symbols for binaries as well. Debug files for the following additional files end up in my libqt4-dbg: 1 from libqt4-dbus: /usr/bin/qdbus 1 from qt4-designer: /usr/bin/designer-qt4 1 from qt4-qtconfig: /usr/bin/qtconfig-qt4 9 from qt4-dev-tools: assistant-qt4 assistant_adp linguist-qt4 pixeltool qcollectiongenerator qdbusviewer qhelpconverter qhelpgenerator xmlpatterns 10 from libqt4-dev: lrelease-qt4 lupdate-qt4 moc-qt4 qdbuscpp2xml qdbusxml2cpp qmake-qt4 qt3to4 rcc uic-qt4 uic3 217 from qt4-demos: qtdemo, 5 libs from /usr/lib/qt4/plugins/designer, 15 demos and 196 examples It would seem to me that for the former, the libqt4-dbg package is a suitable place, even if they amount to something like 63MiB unpacked space on the system. The number of files corresponding to the demos package is excessively large, though, and they consume around 145MiB unpacked. I suggest to either start a separate package qt4-demos-dbg for those, or dropping debug info for them altogether. While the use of those demos to the common qt user is probably pretty small, those actually using the package are developers and thus likely to be interested in debugging them as well. Therefore I'd opt for one more debug package to be built from the qt4-x11 source package. I'll create an updated patch for this. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
I created an updated patch for Jaunty. It failed to build on my PPA, though, due to some PostgreSQL-related issue that seems unrelated to my patch, but makes testing a bit difficult. I'll try a local build tomorrow, I think. The attached patch introduces three new debug packages, for qt4-dev-tools and libqt4-dev as well as qt4-demos, in order to reduce the size of installed debug files for each of these packages. ** Attachment added: debdiff for jaunty http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23955062/qt4-x11_4.5.0-0ubuntu2_to_4.5.0-0ubuntu3%7Eppa0j.debdiff -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Marco, there is no patch for this problem yet, so your comment about sponsoring is irrelevant here. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
The fixing is described in comments 12 through 15. Martin's PPA has it in patch form (debdiff I think): http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20834194/qt4-x11_4.4.3-0ubuntu1_4.4.3-0ubuntu1.2~ppa0i.diff.gz -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Please attach to this report a patch following the instructions reported here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix. Then subscribe to this report ubuntu-main-sponsors. Thanks for your work. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Can some Ubuntu qt packager please have a look at this? I've put quite a lot of personal time, and even more computer runtime, into trying to get this fixed. I've posted the relevant modifications as well as instructions how to integrate them. I'm clobbering my PPA with almost 1 GiB of packages for this, even though they have been outdated less than a month after publishing them. On the other hand, this bug hasn't seen much useful comments from devs since about 5 months. I would like to know 1. whether you are going to fix this for Jaunty, in order to get usable qt backtraces there 2. whether my patches lead in the right direction, or if they are unacceptable for some reason 3. whether it makes sense to update my PPA, or if I should simply delete those packages 'cause noone else cares 4. whether the updated intrepid packages might be placed in some team PPA, to save space in my own PPA -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
** Attachment added: rules.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20842168/bug261380-rules.diff -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
This patch can be added to the debian patch series in order to prevent the qt build system from stripping objects. ** Attachment added: nostrip.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20842185/bug261380-nostrip.diff -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Complete list of my modifications: * Modified debian/rules according to attached script. * Added nostrip patch to debian patch series * rm debian/*-dbg.install * sed -i 's: \./\(.*\)\.debug: ./usr/lib/debug/\1:' debian/*-dbg.lintian * Updated changelog :-) I could have wrapped all this in a single patch, but I guess that would have been less readable and more difficult to integrate with other changes. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
I've got a proposed version in my PPA, with debug packages managed by dh_strip, not the qt build process. See https://launchpad.net/~gagern/+archive Adding CONFIG+=nostrip to QMAKE_VARS in the configure script didn't work, so I added it to some other spec file. I also found that cdbs provides elaborate support for debug packages, and made use of that. The resulting list of debug symbol files looks somewhat longer, needs to be invedtigated still. I'll attach the patch to stop the build from stripping its binaries as well as a patch of the rules file later on; the system where I developed this is already down. Until then, you can compare my diff or simply use my version. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Still not fixed in 4.4.3-1ubuntu4_i386 for Jaunty. I had a typo in comment 9; s/dbg -x/dpkg -x/ To get some traction here, I think the following should work: 1. (debian/patches/) patch configure to include CONFIG+=nostrip in QMAKE_VARS 2. (debian/rules) pass -no-separate-debug-info to the configure invocation 3. (debian/rules) call dh_strip --dbg-package=libqt4-dbg to separte the debugging symbols the Ubuntu way 4. (debian/rules) drop all other packaging instructions for the libqt4-dbg package Right now I don't even have access to my Ubuntu system, so I can't try this out just now. Might take a few weeks before I can work on this again, so if you want to experiment in that direction, be my guest. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Is there no fix for this in hardy? -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Confirming for 4.4.3-0ubuntu1 on Intrepid. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
The crc32 sum seems to be wrong as well. Therefore simply moving/renaming the files won't solve the issue. To use the libQtGui.so.4.4.3 from 4.4.3-0ubuntu1 on i386 as an example: here /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4.4.3.debug has a crc32 value of 0x61598269, computed using the algorithm given in the gdb manual and compared against one calculated using objcopy. The .gnu_debuglink section of /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4.4.3 states 0x18743161. I manually converted endianess; objdump displayed reverse byte order in both cases. As to the cause of this issue: I just had a look at the build log from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/4.4.3-0ubuntu1/+build/729722 and found the following line: (test -z ../../lib/ || cd ../../lib/ ; targ=`basename libQtGui.so.4.4.3`; objcopy --only-keep-debug $targ $targ.debug objcopy --strip-debug $targ objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink=$targ.debug $targ chmod -x $targ.debug ) ; So there the link seems to get set correctly, according to the Fedora scheme, including the .debug extension and presumably with the correct checksum as well. Something seems to modify the installed so file later on, or perhaps the file modified by above command isn't even the one installed later on. I couldn't find any likely command actually naming libQtGui, but it might be a command using a glob, or I might have overlooked something. Strange. Generating separate debug files according to Fedora naming scheme seems to be the default configuration of the qt4 build process. A viable solution to both solve the broken links and also get the package to follow the preferred Ubuntu naming scheme would be to disable both debug symbol separation and stripping from the Qt build process, and instead do the debug symbol separation later on the Ubuntu way, with whatever tools other packages might use. Looking at Gentoo, the way to achieve this seems to be to pass -no- separate-debug-info to configure and CONFIG+=nostrip to qmake. As Ubuntu, in contrast to Gentoo, doesn't seem to invoke qmake directly, I don't know how to achieve this. A viable solution would probably to include it in the default value of QMAKE_VARS in the configure script. See also http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/qt4-build.eclass?view=markup for how Gentoo builds its qt4 packages. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Another observation: Debian (tested with sid packages) also uses Fedora layout for qt4-x11, but doesn't seem to suffer from broken debug links. So what do they differently? 1. mention *.debug in debian/not-installed 2. some differences in debian/rules that I don't completely understand 3. several other differences that seem unlikely to have anything to do with this 4. using debian tools instead of ubuntu ones to build things -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Riddell just merged Qt4 for Jaunty. I wonder if the merge fixed this, although nobody should recommend anybody upgrading to Jaunty this early on to test. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Oops: forgot the link: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/4.4.3-1ubuntu1 -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
It isn't necessary to update to Jaunty just to check this. It would be enough to get a library package unpacked so you can objdump it, and to compare the file name mentioned there with those from the dbg package file list. dbg -x would do the former, while the latter might be possible without even downloading the package itself. Unfortunately it looks like the 1ubuntu1 build is too brand new. The links to the binary packages on the page you referred to lead to launchpad error pages, and packages.ubuntu.com is still taking about version 0ubuntu1. So if you can lay your hand on these packages, you might try this out, but I didn't manage to yet. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
In general the links are not invalid, but they look just fine as far as I can see. Fedora's debug symbol packages are structured differently, which is why their debug link needs to point to libQtGui.so.4.3.debug. However, in Debian/Ubuntu, both the explicit -dbg packages, as well as the automatically created -dbgsym ones on http://ddebs.ubuntu.com usually do *not* append the .debug suffix to files, but just store them in /usr/lib/debug/original path. That's why a debug link equal to the original file name is correct. However, in the particular case of libqt4-dbg, I confirm the bug. This source package seems to not use the standard debhelper way to produce -dbg packages, but something custom which uses the Fedora schema (see http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libqt4-dbg/filelist). Thus the package needs to be fixed to either install files under the (ubuntu/debian) standard path (/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4.4.2 instead of /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4.4.2.debug), or (less preferred) fix their objcopy calls to attach correct debug links. ** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = qt4-x11 Status: New = Triaged -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
cf. for example http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libc6-dbg/filelist and http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libglib2.0-0-dbg/filelist. I deal with -dbg packages quite a lot, and in fact qt4-x11 is the only package I encountered so far which breaks this schema. -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261380] Re: Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink
Martin could you provide some insight here? -- Packages have invalid .gnu_debuglink https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
