You should probably take a look at gocryptfs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
To manage
@wlxing: Sorry didn't see the notification until now. But actually when
i worked on this years ago it was for a SOHO demo project with desktop
clients bound via LAN to a centralized NFS Server for keeping clients
dump and still having encryption. In the end for production we switched
to laptops
@KrautOS: It's been a long while since you commented, and still I do not
have any clue about what the bug status is? Is Tyler still working on
that? I'm going to work ecryptfs on samba for the personal project in
the lab...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I just done a server with NFS(w/o Kerberos)+NIS on basis of the upcoming
Ubuntu 14.04 with server and desktop installations. eCryptfs seems to
work, as i can log into an eCryptfs protected home directory on the
graphical login screen (lightdm needs some config changes though).
At first i thought
Hello KrautOS. Here's some of my setup info, please let me know if you
need more details. Thanks.
vmhost:
vSphere 5.5
vmmachine (nfs-server):
uname -a
Linux xxx 3.11.0-18-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 18 21:11:14 UTC 2014 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lsb_release -a
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
@Johnny: You mean eCryptFS runs better on SAMBA than on NFS on your
side? Can you give us some informations about your setup?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs
As a work around I successfully shared my encrypted partition using CIFS
instead. I do have to share the partition with Windows boxes as well
and so far everything seems to work fine. Performance is good and
usability is seemless for both linux and windows clients. I just need to
look into
By the way the title of this bug seems misleading as ecryptfs seems to
work fine for cifs, samba, and even sshfs. Not sure about WebDAV or
aufs .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Hi zombi
for me doing a bindfs mount on top of the webdav mount and then
mounting the ecryptfs on the bindfs mount worked.
does this work with distributed editing?
e.g
- mounting from device A
- mounting from device B
- edit on device A
are the changes properly reflected on device B ?
--
You
for me doing a bindfs mount on top of the webdav mount and then mounting
the ecryptfs on the bindfs mount worked.
mount.davfs https://dav.box.com box
bindfs box/dav /crypt
mount -t ecryptfs /crypt /decrypt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
FYI it does seem to work over afp/netatalk. It isn't a workaround for
most uses (including mine unfortunately) but it might help some people.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Will this bug be fixed, or it is already fixed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
To manage
On 2012-12-13 19:10:06, Don wrote:
Will this bug be fixed, or it is already fixed?
It isn't fixed. Most of the work for NFS is done, but there's still more
to do. It is marked wishlist because no one is working on it and it
isn't considered a priority at this time.
In the future, please check
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Assignee: Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
On 2012-01-16 20:47:27, Chris wrote:
@Tyler: does this last remaining NFS issue also effect the other
protocols like WebDAV or CIFS? If not, would it be possible to release a
fix which supports all the other protocols except NFS?
I'm not certain as my focus was just on NFS. CIFS looks to make
@Tyler: does this last remaining NFS issue also effect the other
protocols like WebDAV or CIFS? If not, would it be possible to release a
fix which supports all the other protocols except NFS?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
@Tyler, what's the status on that NFS client patch? Any progress?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: In Progress = Triaged
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Importance: High = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not
eCryptfs on top of NFS isn't going to happen in the short term. Nearly
all of the eCryptfs fixes are now in place, except for one last sticking
point. The NFS maintainer is requiring that eCryptfs fix up a struct
nameidata and pass it down into NFS, but that can get ugly and is
something that the
@Tyler, thanks for your status update!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277578
Title:
ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
To manage notifications
** Summary changed:
- ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, or aufs
+ ecryptfs does not work properly over nfs, cifs, samba, WebDAV, or aufs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
21 matches
Mail list logo
