This bug report is being closed due to your last comment. For future
reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the
current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the
revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at
zosx, from the comments it seems your problem has been resolved. can we
close this bug report?
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug
Yes. Please close this bug report. I don't want to help any more
people troubleshoot their messed up partition tables. :P
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification because you are a
I hate to say it but your problem has nothing to do with the partition
table problems people were having. It seems like your table is fine.
Have you tried manually adding the partition to fstab? I mean why is
it failing? Does a mount -t ntfs /dev/sdb2 /mount/Windows work for
instance? Just saying
Oops, zosX is correct. My problem is a much simpler one. I didn't have
the directory created for the mount point. Don't know how that was
forgotten.
My bad. Sorry. And thanks.
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You
I also cannot access my Windows partition. It is reported correctly by
fdisk
$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 320.0 GB, 320072933376 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xc435
Device Boot Start
I tried partition magic, but it does not work with vista unfortunately.
Then I realized you need to use sudo in front of cfdisk. using that, I
getFATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 2: Partition ends in the final
partial cylinder
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table
also, fdisk shows this.
Disk /dev/sda: 200.0 GB, 200049647616 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24321 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x6000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 121317
Has anybody figured out a way around this? I royally screwed up my sound
driver and decided I would just install Intrepid. I had been using
hardy. I just formatted the partition that that hardy was on and now I
have it as free space. Yet when I go to install, the only option is to
format the
Looking at what zosX has said about the overlapping, I am wondering
which one of these do I delete and how do I do that? Thank you very
much.
I have a dell XPS m1530 with one partition being 10gb of recovery. one
partition being 2.5gb for media direct and the other is vista. I would
like to keep
Sorry for the many posts. This is what vista displays all my drives as,
if it helps with what I stated before. I would like to put ubuntu back
on the free space + unallocated, but keep vista,media direct, and
recovery. Thank you very much
** Attachment added: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\disk
Sure. Make sure that your file table is correct and in proper order. That
was my initial problem. I believe that I used cfdisk to show the partitions.
Make sure that any extended partitions only contain logical drives. I had a
logical drive somehow marked as a primary partition. Changing the bit
when i type cfdisk into the terminal, it gives FATAL ERROR: Cannot open
disk drive. Press any key to exit cfdisk. That first 87MB partition
appeared a few days ago, I am not sure why. The media direct has to be
on a seperate partition as it allows you to play music and videos
without having to
I'd still try to delete that extended partition and recreate it. Sounds like
your partition table is pretty screwed to me. Rewriting it with windows or
something might help. I don't think anything will work for you without
changes to the table somehow. Unallocated space doesn't just suddenly
If you could tell me how to delete it, I would be more than willing to.
The only thing on the hard drive that I do not want to lose is the
recovery partition. As for the others, I have nothing on them that I
want to keep that badly, and the recovery makes it easy for reinstalling
windows. If you
Yeah I meant Wubi. Try deleting them in windows since it sees all the
partitions and can probably manipulate them without issue. I'm guessing that
it was a windows install on that disk anyways to begin with. I've never seen
a partition table that cfdisk couldn't mangle back together so all I can
Ohpartition magic may be able to straighten that out too. Don't know if
the DOS version will see your drive but the windows install should be able
too
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Mark Bassett zosxav...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah I meant Wubi. Try deleting them in windows since it sees
I have the same problem with the final release of Intrepid Ibex.
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
still affects 8.10 final release. this is a very unlikely bug
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Problem does not exist for me in kubuntu 8.10 final.
--
Cheers,
Doctor Rimzi
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Same problem on the release candidate. cfdisk is now on the iso, and
that also seems to report the correct table information. I think I can
safely rule out that there is something wrong with my partition table.
Isn't the installer partitioning utility based on gparted? Both show
nothing just an
Sorry for all the comments (squeaky wheel, hehe). Also you might want
to notice that the drive sizes are listed differently between
cfdisk/fdisk and gparted. I think therein lies a clue. The ONLY
software that refuses to correctly report the drive capacity and the
partition table so far is
Partition Table for /dev/sdb
First Last
# Type Sector Sector OffsetLength Filesystem Type (ID) Flag
-- --- --- --- -- ---
1 Primary 0 139588784 63 139588785 HPFS/NTFS (07)
Actuall I fail altogether. You cannot have a primary partition existing
in a extended partition. Don't know why I didn't see that right away.
I also have no clue as to how that happened. Partition table
corruption? Strange. Deleting the partition in cfdisk makes it
readable in gparted. Issue
This works for me now that I downloaded the latest version. Yay.
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Confirmed on Kubuntu Intrepid RC, and this time, it shows only white
blank space (as if there are no hdd's).
This is on a HP Pavilion dv6018ea laptop, the HDD is SATA, and is
partitioned into two partitions: one for WinXP, one for WinVista.
Haven't had this problem on this laptop in any previous
The latest snapshot still does not show my partitions. Ubuntu's console
fdisk shows them fine while the installer and gparted do not. Seeing as
how I made the partitions with gparted in the first place, there should
not be a conflict here. Writing the table from the console fdisk does
nothing to
Scratch that. I just didn't see the file. Here you go:
** Attachment added: gpartedfail
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18461947/gpartedfail
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification
Stupid windowshere is the file :)
** Attachment added: gpartedfail.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18461980/gpartedfail.png
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification because
I didn't get a chance to try 20081008, but it the 20081009.1 snapshot worked
fine.
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Did the 10/08 snapshot fix it yet? Seems like they had this bug before
in 7.04 from reading through the bug reports. Perhaps it is the same bug
rearing its ugly head again.
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159
You
I'm having a similar/related problem. I used yesterday's (10/7) snapshot
install CD, amd64 server (text installer), and the install process fails at the
partitioning step. I was able to use a shell on another tty to partition my hd
(/dev/sda), but even once partitioned, the installer doesn't
I'm having this problem too.
Both of the partitions on my disk show up in the places menu and when I
do mount -a; however, the partition editor in ubiquity, gparted, and
partman all report it as being unpartitioned space.
--
Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA
33 matches
Mail list logo
