[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2009-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
I removed the current f-u-s-a from intrepid-proposed. Breaking translations and changing the UI is really not acceptable for a stable update, and I'm sorry that I got talked into and accepted this into -proposed at all. ** Changed in: fast-user-switch-applet (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2009-01-28 Thread Martin Pitt
This update has been in intrepid-proposed for over three months, without any testing feedback. Can anyone please test this version and tell us whether it still works normally, and this bug is fixed for you? Thanks! -- Use Available not Online as IM status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279057

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2009-01-28 Thread David Planella
I believe my previous comment can be considered as feedback. Having the intrepid-proposed enabled and having installed the update, I can only say this will still be a regression until a new Intrepid langpack is released with the string translations. Otherwise users will suddenly get a new

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-11-22 Thread David Planella
I consider substituting a very visible translated string with an unstranslated one for such a minor fix a clear regression. Before doing such changes, please consider: * Notifying the ubuntu-translators list about string changes, otherwise it is nearly impossible for translators to know there is

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-11-21 Thread Luca Ferretti
Please don't forget to update PO template, allowing translators to translate the new string Available. I don't know if you have to warn some mailing list for string change. -- Use Available not Online as IM status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279057 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-11-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted into intrepid-proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: fast-user-switch-applet (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Incomplete = In Progress

Re: [Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-11-19 Thread Ted Gould
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 13:51 +, Martin Pitt wrote: Although I agree that it would be good to fix this in intrepid, too, it is a heavily visible string change. Can you please get the doc team's approval, or respectively them to update the documentation accordingly, if they have screenshots

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-11-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package fast-user-switch-applet - 2.24.0-0ubuntu7 --- fast-user-switch-applet (2.24.0-0ubuntu7) jaunty; urgency=low * Added debian/patches/73_max_users_from_passwd.patch which makes it so there is a maximum of 15 users that can be read from the

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-11-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Although I agree that it would be good to fix this in intrepid, too, it is a heavily visible string change. Can you please get the doc team's approval, or respectively them to update the documentation accordingly, if they have screenshots and documentation about fusa? ** Changed in:

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-10-24 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
Every status other than offline is online, so having a single status called Online doesn't make sense. Available FTW. -- Use Available not Online as IM status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 279057] Re: Use Available not Online as IM status

2008-10-23 Thread Ted Gould
** Changed in: fast-user-switch-applet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Assignee: (unassigned) = Ted Gould (ted-gould) Status: New = Confirmed -- Use Available not Online as IM status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279057 You received this bug notification because you are a